• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 54-68 of 2,280 results

No. 737 REDACTED VERSION of 735 Answering Brief in Opposition, by Acceleration Bay LLC

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 737 (D.Del. Dec. 23, 2021)
Activision’s infringing games, which have no relationship to the gamesof its competitor Take-Two, use networkstructures that are very different from those at issue in Take-Two, precluding any application of collateral estoppel, particularly on summary judgment, where Acceleration Bayis entitled to all reasonable inferences from the record.
Activision, as “[t]he proponent of claim or issue preclusion bears the burden of showing that the accused devices are essentially the sameas thosein the prior litigation.” ArcelorMittal, 908 F.3d at 1274; In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litig., 639 F.3d 1303, 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2011).
At most, Activision’s arguments, which are contradicted by the record, highlight the material disputed factual issues that preclude summary judgment, including that Call of Dutyis configured to have an m-regular Connectivity Graph Network that is not dependent on player action.
At a minimum,this substantial evidence confirms the existence of a genuine material factual dispute, precluding summary judgment that WoW is indistinguishable from GTAandtherefore subject to collateral estoppel.
at 12 (WoW:“Thus, Dr. Medvidovic’s hypothetical is at most a transient and coincidental occurrence resulting from howplayers are interacting with each other”) (citation and footnote omitted); id. at 19-20 (Destiny: “Setting an optimal number or maximum numberof neighbors does not meet this limitation”); D.I.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 485

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 485 (D.Del. Sep. 26, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 553

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 553 (D.Del. Sep. 26, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 728

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 728 (D.Del. Nov. 1, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 692

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 692 (D.Del. Sep. 4, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 693

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 693 (D.Del. Sep. 4, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 545

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 545 (D.Del. Mar. 27, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 546

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 546 (D.Del. Mar. 27, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 460

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 460 (D.Del. Feb. 28, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 646

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 646 (D.Del. Mar. 5, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 455

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 455 (D.Del. Jan. 18, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 456

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 456 (D.Del. Jan. 18, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 522

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 522 (D.Del. Jan. 23, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 521

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 521 (D.Del. Jan. 18, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 448

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 448 (D.Del. Dec. 10, 2018)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>