• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 54-68 of 2,262 results

No. 513 SO ORDERED Granting (512 in 16-cv-454-RGA, 447 in 16-cv-455-RGA) Stipulation and Order Regarding ...

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 513 (D.Del. Dec. 10, 2018)
Dec. 15, 2014); WHEREAS, on August 29, 2018, in the Activision Action, the Court issued an Order striking the portion of Dr. Meyer's report which relied on that jury verdict (D.I.
509), the Court stated that it did "not intend to change [its] position that Plaintiffs expert's opinion based on the Uniloc USA, Inc. v. EA, No. 6:13-cv-00259-RWA (E.D.
Dec. 15, 2014),jury verdict is inadmissible," denied the Parties' joint request to continue the trial in the EA Action "subject to reconsideration" at the summary judgment hearing in the EA action set for December 20, 2018, limited the December 20 hearing to "summary judgment motions," and Ordered that "if Plaintiff intends to offer any damages theories in this case other than the ones it currently has, it needs to meet-and-confer with Defendant and file any necessary motion no later than December 7, 2018;" WHEREAS, in an Order dated November 28, 2018 in the Activision Action (D.I.
WHEREAS, the trials in the EA and Take Two Actions are currently scheduled for March 4, 2019 and November 4, 2019; WHEREAS, given these trial dates, there is not sufficient time for the Parties to complete supplemental expert reports, take depositions, follow the procedures set forth in the Activision Case Management Order (D.I.
The parties shall follow the procedures set forth in the October 30, 2019 Case Management Order in the Activision Action (16-453 D.I.
cite Cite Document

No. 630 SO ORDERED Adopting Activision's proposed schedule at D.I. 627 (see Order for further details)

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 630 (D.Del. Nov. 28, 2018)
WHEREAS, the Court ordered the parties to submit a schedule for supplementation of the damages case in C.A.
619); WHEREAS, Acceleration Bay intends to provide an expert report from Russell Parr to supplement Acceleration Bay's damages claim; WHEREAS, Mr. Parr was first identified by Acceleration Bay on November 7, 2018; WHEREAS, Activision objects to Acceleration Bay serving a report from Mr. Parr on the basis that he was not disclosed during discovery; WHEREAS, Acceleration Bay agrees that it will only serve one supplemental report; WHEREAS, subject to Activision's objection to Acceleration Bay serving a report from Mr. Parr, Activision agrees to waive its objection to Mr. Parr receiving Activision's highly confidential information under the protective order; WHEREAS, Activision reserves the right to challenge Acceleration Bay's supplemental report and proffer of proof on damages and Acceleration Bay reserves the right to challenge the expert reports Activision submits in response to Acceleration Bay's supplemental reports regarding damages;
WHEREAS, the parties conferred regarding scheduling in the Activision act1on and failed to reach agreement on the following issues: 1.
WHEREAS, the Parties have set forth their proposed schedules below: Event Acceleration Bay serves supplemental damages expert report Activision serves supplemental damages expert reports Conclusion of depositions on supplemental expert reports Acceleration Bay's Proposal Activision's Proposal 12/7/18 12/7/18 1/18/19 1/25/19 2/1/19 2/8/19 Acceleration Bay files proffer on its damages case · 2/8/19 2/15/19 3/15/19 4/5/19 4/19/19 File opening brief(s) on challenge to proffer of proof and supplemental damages report( s) File responsive brief(s) File reply brief(s) Hearing date 2/22/19 3/15/19 3/25/19 To be set by the Court To be set by the Court The Parties will submit letter briefs of no more than three pages setting forth their positions on these two issues on November 20, 2018. '
\, POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP By: Isl Philip A. Rovner Philip A. Rovner (#3215) Jonathan A. Choa (#5319) Hercules Plaza P.O.
cite Cite Document

No. 509

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 509 (D.Del. Nov. 26, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 620

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 620 (D.Del. Oct. 30, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 619

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 619 (D.Del. Oct. 30, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 604

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 604 (D.Del. Oct. 23, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 600

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 600 (D.Del. Oct. 17, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 49

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Acceleration Bay LLC, 5:19-cv-04133, No. 49 (N.D.Cal. Dec. 5, 2019)

cite Cite Document

No. 47

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Acceleration Bay LLC, 5:19-cv-04133, No. 47 (N.D.Cal. Dec. 3, 2019)

cite Cite Document

No. 440

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 440 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 441

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 441 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 578

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 578 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 579

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 579 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 500

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 500 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 499

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 499 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2018)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>