• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 54-68 of 2,262 results

No. 513 SO ORDERED Granting (512 in 16-cv-454-RGA, 447 in 16-cv-455-RGA) Stipulation and Order Regarding ...

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 513 (D.Del. Dec. 10, 2018)
Dec. 15, 2014); WHEREAS, on August 29, 2018, in the Activision Action, the Court issued an Order striking the portion of Dr. Meyer's report which relied on that jury verdict (D.I.
509), the Court stated that it did "not intend to change [its] position that Plaintiffs expert's opinion based on the Uniloc USA, Inc. v. EA, No. 6:13-cv-00259-RWA (E.D.
Dec. 15, 2014),jury verdict is inadmissible," denied the Parties' joint request to continue the trial in the EA Action "subject to reconsideration" at the summary judgment hearing in the EA action set for December 20, 2018, limited the December 20 hearing to "summary judgment motions," and Ordered that "if Plaintiff intends to offer any damages theories in this case other than the ones it currently has, it needs to meet-and-confer with Defendant and file any necessary motion no later than December 7, 2018;" WHEREAS, in an Order dated November 28, 2018 in the Activision Action (D.I.
WHEREAS, the trials in the EA and Take Two Actions are currently scheduled for March 4, 2019 and November 4, 2019; WHEREAS, given these trial dates, there is not sufficient time for the Parties to complete supplemental expert reports, take depositions, follow the procedures set forth in the Activision Case Management Order (D.I.
The parties shall follow the procedures set forth in the October 30, 2019 Case Management Order in the Activision Action (16-453 D.I.
cite Cite Document

No. 630

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 630 (D.Del. Nov. 28, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 509 ORDER: The oral argument scheduled for December 19, 2018, at 10:00 AM is rescheduled to December ...

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 509 (D.Del. Nov. 26, 2018)
WHEREAS, the Parties have submitted letters and a joint statement regarding suggested changes to the case schedule (D.I.
424,426,467,476), and Defendant's Daubert Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Dr. Nenad Medvidovic, Dr. Michael Mitzenmacher, Dr. Christine Meyer, Dr. Harry Bims, and Dr. Ricardo Valerdi (D.I.
500) which resolved the motions then pending in a related action, Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., No. 16-453; WHEREAS, my resolution of certain Daubert motions significantly impacted Plaintiffs damages case in the Activision Blizzard matter; WHEREAS, trial in the Activision Blizzard matter has been postponed indefinitely pending resolution of the admissibility of Plaintiff's remaining damages case; WHEREAS, Acceleration Bay's proposed damages expert's opinion is very similar to the opinion I excluded in the Activision Blizzard matter; WHEREAS, I do not intend to change my position that Plaintiffs expert's opinion based oh the Uniloc USA, Inc. v. EA, No. 6: 13-cv-00259-RWA (E.D.
Dec. 15, 2014), jury verdict is inadmissible; WHEREAS, I do not believe that issues with Plaintiffs damages case require delaying trial in this matter, but I agree that the pending damages motions should be addressed, if at all, at a later date; WHEREAS, my initial review of the briefing in this case has revealed that some of the same general summary judgment issues addressed in the Memorandum Opinion are repeated; and WHEREAS, the Parties are in a better position than the Court to determine if, and to what extent, issues resolved in the Memorandum Opinion bear on the appropriate resolution of the summary judgment motions; NOW THEREFORE this 26 day of November 2018, IT IS ORDERED that the oral argument scheduled for December 19, 2018 at 10:00 AM is rescheduled to December 20, 2018 at
499) that may bear on the summary judgment motions; IT IS ORDERED that the Parties' request that I postpone the trial in this matter is DENIED subject to my reconsideration following discussion with the Parties at the December 20, 2018 argument; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff intends to offer any damages theories in this case other than the ones it currently has, it needs to meet-and-confer with Defendant and file any necessary motion no later than December 7, 2018.
cite Cite Document

No. 620

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 620 (D.Del. Oct. 30, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 619

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 619 (D.Del. Oct. 30, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 604

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 604 (D.Del. Oct. 23, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 600

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 600 (D.Del. Oct. 17, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 49

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Acceleration Bay LLC, 5:19-cv-04133, No. 49 (N.D.Cal. Dec. 5, 2019)

cite Cite Document

No. 47

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Acceleration Bay LLC, 5:19-cv-04133, No. 47 (N.D.Cal. Dec. 3, 2019)

cite Cite Document

No. 440

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 440 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 441

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 441 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 578

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 578 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 579

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 579 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 500

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 500 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2018)

cite Cite Document

No. 499

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 499 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2018)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>