• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
66 results

Netflix, Inc. v. VL Collective IP LLC

Docket IPR2023-00630, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Feb. 23, 2023)
David McKone, Jeffrey Smith, Karl Easthom, Stacey White, Stephen Belisle, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7440559
Patent Owner VL Collective IP LLC
Petitioner Netflix, Inc.
Assignee PRAETOR FUND I, A SUB-FUND OF PRAETORIUM FUND I ICAV
cite Cite Docket

31 Final Written Decision original: Final Written Decision original

Document IPR2023-00630, No. 31 Final Written Decision original - Final Written Decision original (P.T.A.B. Oct. 2, 2024)
An obviousness analysis “need not seek out precise teachings directed to the specific subject matter of the challenged claim, for a court can take account of the inferences and creative steps that a person of ordinary skill in the art would employ.” KSR, 550 U.S. at 418.
Furthermore, Petitioner does not satisfy its burden of proving obviousness by employing “mere conclusory statements,” but “must instead articulate specific reasoning, based on evidence of record, to support the legal conclusion of obviousness.” In re Magnum Oil Tools Int’l, Ltd., 829 F.3d 1364, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
Patent Owner contends that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have understood that the indication should contain as little data as possible in order to increase speed and decrease memory.
Mr. Wechselberger testifies that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have understood that the differencing engine would receive an identification of the versions of content stored on the caches in order to make that comparison.
Patent Owner contends that there is no mechanism in Cassin for issuing instructions, and therefore a person of ordinary skill in the art would not have had a reasonable expectation of success in adding Huston’s delete command.
cite Cite Document

28 Other Hearing transcript: Other Hearing transcript

Document IPR2023-00630, No. 28 Other Hearing transcript - Other Hearing transcript (P.T.A.B. Aug. 20, 2024)

cite Cite Document

25 Order Other: Order Setting Oral Argument 37 CFR 4270

Document IPR2023-00630, No. 25 Order Other - Order Setting Oral Argument 37 CFR 4270 (P.T.A.B. Jun. 3, 2024)

cite Cite Document

17 Order on Motion: ORDER Granting Petitioner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admiss...

Document IPR2023-00630, No. 17 Order on Motion - ORDER Granting Petitioner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Stephen A Marshall 37 CFR § 4210 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 28, 2023)

cite Cite Document

11 Order Other: Order Other

Document IPR2023-00630, No. 11 Order Other - Order Other (P.T.A.B. Oct. 3, 2023)

cite Cite Document

10 Institution Decision Grant: Institution Decision Grant

Document IPR2023-00630, No. 10 Institution Decision Grant - Institution Decision Grant (P.T.A.B. Oct. 3, 2023)

cite Cite Document

9 Order on Motion: Order Granting Patent Owners Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admis...

Document IPR2023-00630, No. 9 Order on Motion - Order Granting Patent Owners Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jamie F Cardenas Navia (P.T.A.B. Jul. 19, 2023)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 >>