• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 24-38 of 2,262 results

No. 80 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 53 Motion ...

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Acceleration Bay LLC, 5:19-cv-04133, No. 80 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 1, 2020)
Motion to StrikeDenied
Defendant Acceleration Bay LLC (“Acceleration Bay”) requests that the Court strike counterclaims-in-reply asserted by Plaintiff Epic Games, Inc. (“Epic Games”) in its counterclaim answer, or, in the alternative, to reclassify those counterclaims-in-reply as amendments to the complaint.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) permits a court to strike from a pleading an insufficient defense and “any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” Fed. R. Civ.
Acceleration Bay argues that Epic Games seeks an end-run around rules governing availability of inter partes review (“IPR”) by bringing its patent invalidity claims as counterclaims-in-reply.
In order to fulfill its role of streamlining invalidity proceedings, Congress limited a party’s ability to seek an IPR after commencement of civil litigation in two ways.
Acceleration Bay now argues that the Court has the sole power to prevent Epic Games from benefiting from an apparent loophole in the IPR statutory scheme.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 513 MANDATE of USCA as to 499 Notice of Cross Appeal, filed by 2K Sports, Inc., Take-Two Interactive ...

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 513 (D.Del. Oct. 2, 2020)
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:16-cv-00455-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.
(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: October 2, 2020
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 712

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 712 (D.Del. Apr. 21, 2020)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 562

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 562 (D.Del. Apr. 21, 2020)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 492

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 492 (D.Del. Mar. 23, 2020)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 495

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 495 (D.Del. Mar. 23, 2020)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 493

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 493 (D.Del. Mar. 23, 2020)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 530

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 530 (D.Del. Apr. 4, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 526

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 526 (D.Del. Mar. 17, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 527

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 527 (D.Del. Mar. 17, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 705

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 705 (D.Del. Jan. 29, 2020)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 523

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 523 (D.Del. Feb. 15, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 518

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 518 (D.Del. Jan. 5, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 737

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 737 (D.Del. Dec. 23, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 485

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 485 (D.Del. Sep. 26, 2019)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... >>