• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
12 results

CONNECTION ARCHITECTURE FOR A MOBILE NETWORK

Docket 14/623,514, U.S. Patent Application (Feb. 17, 2015)
Art Group2644
Case TypeUtility - 455/420000
Class455
Patent
9608968
Trevor A. Fiatal
Lee R. Boynton
Scott M Burke
...
cite Cite Docket

Report on the filing or determination of an action regarding a patent

Document CONNECTION ARCHITECTURE FOR A MOBILE NETWORK, 14/623,514, No. K8G9YBMHRXEAPX3 (U.S. Pat. App. Mar. 31, 2020)
Case 2:19-cv-00115-JRG Document 3 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1of2PagelID#: 199
Mail Stop 8 Director of the U.S, Patent and Trademark Office P.O.
In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been filed in the U.S. District Court
UJ Answer CO CrossBill (1 Other Pleading
In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
cite Cite Document

Request for Trial Granted

Document CONNECTION ARCHITECTURE FOR A MOBILE NETWORK, 14/623,514, No. KBMCBVV7RXEAPX3 (U.S. Pat. App. Jun. 11, 2020)
Accordingto Petitioner, although Yamamoto “provideslittle detail about ... specific configuration of the IP server,” a personal of ordinary skill in the art (‘POSITA”) “would have realized, however, that the Internet was an unsecured public network,” and thus, “would have looked to Spacey to improve Yamamoto’s system by,e.g., implementing a firewall in front of the IP server.” Jd.
Petitioner contends that, as shownin its annotated Figure 1 of Yamamoto reproduced below, a system resulting from the proposed combination “would have included a firewall at a boundary between a private network of the IP server device and the Internet, as taught by Spacey.”
See generally Prelim. Resp. We have reviewed Petitioner’s arguments and evidence and determine Petitioner has made a sufficient showing that the combination of Yamamoto, Spacey, and Hazel teaches a “method of operating a server to managetransactions betweenfirst and second devices,”as recited in claim
Onthis record, Petitioner’s rationale that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have foundit obvious to combine the teachings of Yamamoto and Spacey,in further view of Hazelis sufficiently supported for purposes of this Decision.
In particular, in addition to the citations to Yamamoto, Spacey, Hazel, Orsic, and Stevens, Petitioner cites Chesley for its disclosures implementing ‘“‘a communication interface, processor, and memory in the gateway server.” Jd.
cite Cite Document

KBMC5L2SRXEAPX3

Document CONNECTION ARCHITECTURE FOR A MOBILE NETWORK, 14/623,514, No. KBMC5L2SRXEAPX3 (U.S. Pat. App. Jun. 11, 2020)

cite Cite Document

JXEXFUC0RXEAPX1

Document CONNECTION ARCHITECTURE FOR A MOBILE NETWORK, 14/623,514, No. JXEXFUC0RXEAPX1 (U.S. Pat. App. Jun. 27, 2019)

cite Cite Document

JWS84M63RXEAPX1

Document CONNECTION ARCHITECTURE FOR A MOBILE NETWORK, 14/623,514, No. JWS84M63RXEAPX1 (U.S. Pat. App. Jun. 13, 2019)

cite Cite Document

JN3M04VYRXEAPX1

Document CONNECTION ARCHITECTURE FOR A MOBILE NETWORK, 14/623,514, No. JN3M04VYRXEAPX1 (U.S. Pat. App. Oct. 3, 2018)

cite Cite Document

JMUZ8G2MRXEAPX3

Document CONNECTION ARCHITECTURE FOR A MOBILE NETWORK, 14/623,514, No. JMUZ8G2MRXEAPX3 (U.S. Pat. App. Oct. 3, 2018)

cite Cite Document
1 2 >>