• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 84-98 of 492 results

No. 114 Corrected NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Acceleration Bay LLC's Initial Claim Charts Pursuant ...

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 114 (D.Del. Mar. 22, 2016)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, prior to 6:00 p.m., on March 22, 2016, a true and correct copy of the following document was served on the following counsel of record at the addresses and in the manner indicated:
TO SECTION 1(e) OF THE RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 112 NOTICE of Subpoena by Activision Blizzard Inc., 2K Sports Inc., Rockstar Games Inc., Take-Two ...

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 112 (D.Del. Mar. 21, 2016)
If an objection is made, the following rules apply: (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the court for the district where compliance is required for an order compelling production or inspection.
On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost.
The court for the district where compliance is required—and also, after a motion is transferred, the issuing court—may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to it.
“Accused Products” shall mean any product or service manufactured, used, sold, offered for sale or imported into the United States by or on behalf of any Defendants that Acceleration Bay alleges infringes the Asserted Patents.
“Person” or “persons” shall mean any natural person, legal entity, business or other entities, including but not limited to any corporation, partnership, unincorporated association, joint venture, sole proprietorship, government agency, business trusts, or any and/or all other organization or group of individuals; as well as any officer, director, employee, partner, corporate parent, subsidiary, affiliate, agent, representative, attorney, or principal thereof.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 21 ANSWER to 7 Amended Complaint, with Jury Demand, by Activision Blizzard Inc..(Kraftschik, Stephen) ...

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 21 (D.Del. Jul. 13, 2015)
Answer
Defendant Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Activision”) submits the following answer and affirmative defenses to the Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement filed by Plaintiff Acceleration Bay LLC (“Acceleration Bay”).
Additionally, Activision joined in and incorporated by reference Electronic Arts’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims of joint infringement and its Opening Brief in support thereof.
Activision admits it is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and that it has its principal place of business located in Santa Monica, California.
Activision lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations set forth in paragraph 39 as it relates to Destiny and therefore denies them.
Activision lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations set forth in paragraph 40 as it relates to Destiny and therefore denies them.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 108 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Acceleration Bay LLC's Supplemental Objections and Responses ...

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 108 (D.Del. Mar. 18, 2016)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that prior to 6 p.m. on March 18, 2016, a true and correct copy of the following document was served on the following counsel of record at the addresses and in the manner indicated:
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 105 REDACTED VERSION of 101 Opening Brief in Support, by Activision Blizzard Inc., 2K Sports Inc., ...

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 105 (D.Del. Mar. 8, 2016)
As a consequence of a variety of agreements, the rights to the Asserted Patents are dispersed among at least four parties: Boeing, AB, Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. (“Sony”), and Hamilton Capital XII LLC (“Hamilton Capital”).
But a transfer of “less than one of these three interests is a license, not an assignment of legal title, and it gives the licensee no right to sue for infringement at law m the licensee’s own name.” Rite-Hire, 56 F.3d at 1551-52 (emphasis added).
Under similar circumstances, in Pfizer, Inc. v. Elan Pharm. Research Corp., cited by the Federal Circuit with approval (see Abbott, 47 F.3d at 1133), this Court held that the plaintiff lacked standing where the transferor retained, inter alia, the right to market patented products commercially in the United States.
Similarly in Alfred E. Mann, the original owner, AMF, executed an agreement granting broad and exclusive rights to the transferee.
In Clouding, based on a careful review of the Patent Purchase Agreement, the Court found no transfer of legal title and that transferee did not receive enough of the bundle of rights to establish prudential standing.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 104 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Acceleration Bay LLC's Objections and Responses to Defendants ...

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 104 (D.Del. Mar. 4, 2016)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that prior to 6 p.m. on March 4, 2016, a true and correct copy of the following document was served on the following counsel of record at the addresses and in the manner indicated:
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 103

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 103 (D.Del. Mar. 3, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 99

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 99 (D.Del. Feb. 25, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 97

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 97 (D.Del. Feb. 24, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 96

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 96 (D.Del. Feb. 23, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 95

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 95 (D.Del. Feb. 19, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 93

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 93 (D.Del. Feb. 18, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 22-1

Document Activision Blizzard Inc. v. Acceleration Bay LLC, 1:16-cv-00774, No. 22-1 (D.Del. Jul. 15, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 92

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 92 (D.Del. Feb. 17, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 91

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 91 (D.Del. Feb. 17, 2016)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... >>