• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 69-83 of 468 results

No. 96 NOTICE of Subpoena by Activision Blizzard Inc., 2K Sports Inc., Rockstar Games Inc., Take-Two ...

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 96 (D.Del. Feb. 23, 2016)
To: Global IP Law Group, LLC, 55 West Monroe Street, Suite 3400, Chicago, IL 60603 (Name of person to whom this subpoena is directed) ✔ Production: YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and to permit inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the material: See Attachment A. Place: Winston & Strawn LLP, c/o Michael A. Tomasulo 35 W. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601-9703 Date and Time: 03/08/2016 5:00 pm Inspection of Premises: YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit entry onto the designated premises, land, or other property possessed or controlled by you at the time, date, and location set forth below, so that the requesting party may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the property or any designated object or operation on it.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), (e), and (g) (Effective 12/1/13) (ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s study that was not requested by a party.
If an objection is made, the following rules apply: (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the court for the district where compliance is required for an order compelling production or inspection.
The court for the district where compliance is required—and also, after a motion is transferred, the issuing court—may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to it.
“Accused Products” shall mean any product or service manufactured, used, sold, offered for sale or imported into the United States by or on behalf of any Defendants that Acceleration Bay alleges infringes the Asserted Patents.
cite Cite Document

No. 95

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 95 (D.Del. Feb. 19, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 93

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 93 (D.Del. Feb. 18, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 22-1

Document Activision Blizzard Inc. v. Acceleration Bay LLC, 1:16-cv-00774, No. 22-1 (D.Del. Jul. 15, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 92

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 92 (D.Del. Feb. 17, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 91

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 91 (D.Del. Feb. 17, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 86

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 86 (D.Del. Feb. 11, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 88

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 88 (D.Del. Feb. 11, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 85

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 85 (D.Del. Feb. 11, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 82

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 82 (D.Del. Feb. 9, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 80

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 80 (D.Del. Feb. 3, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 79

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 79 (D.Del. Feb. 1, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 78

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 78 (D.Del. Jan. 29, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 75

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 75 (D.Del. Jan. 26, 2016)

cite Cite Document

No. 73

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 73 (D.Del. Jan. 26, 2016)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... >>