Document
IPR2017-01600, No. 1047-69 Exhibit - Exhibit 1047 Order re Standing (P.T.A.B. Nov. 27, 2017)
INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC., and 2K
In light of the Court's previous Memorandum (C.A.
145), filed on June 3, 2016, and Plaintiffs letter (C.A.
Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of standing (C.A.
Entered this Jvo day of June, 2016.
Cite Document
IPR2017-01600, No. 1047-69 Exhibit - Exhibit 1047 Order re Standing (P.T.A.B. Nov. 27, 2017)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 106 (D.Del. Mar. 8, 2016)
I, Michael A. Tomasulo, make the following Declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746:
Attached hereto as Exhibits are true and correct copies of the packaging for the following Accused Products for the Sony PlayStation platform.
Grand Theft Auto V Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 Destiny
Attached hereto as Exhibits are true and correct copies of the following documents: Exhibit CC Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Liown Electronics Co., No. 2015-1671, slip op.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 106 (D.Del. Mar. 8, 2016)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 61 (D.Del. Jan. 6, 2016)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Acceleration Bay will serve the subpoena attached hereto as Exhibit A on Bungie, LLC, 434 Kirkland Way, Kirkland WA 98033.
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 61 (D.Del. Jan. 6, 2016)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 48 (D.Del. Dec. 7, 2015)
Motion for Reconsideration
As written, these provisions impose undue prejudice on Plaintiff by preventing it from employing its counsel of choice, maintaining a cohesive litigation strategy, avoiding duplicated efforts and increased costs, and preparing its case for trial.
Any perceived risk to Defendants is far outweighed by the “significant” harm in denying Plaintiff the full benefit of its trial counsel in post-litigation proceedings, thereby damaging its ability to maintain a coherent legal strategy and minimize duplicative costs and efforts.
Because at least some of these schematics and descriptions of Defendants’ software are likely to be critical to Plaintiff’s burden of proving infringement, restriction of these documents – that do not contain any actual source code or programming language – from disclosure to the individuals described above severely hinders Plaintiff’s counsel from preparing this case for trial.
Such a provision will prevent Plaintiff from employing its counsel of choice, maintaining a cohesive litigation strategy, and avoiding duplicated costs and efforts, all of which are “significant” burdens this Court has previously held outweigh the associated risks to defendants.
Similarly, the Protective Order’s definition of “Restricted Confidential – Source Code Material” (¶ 1.10) is inconsistent with the Court’s own interpretation, grants an unfair advantage to Defendants in post-grant proceedings when combined with the Prosecution Bar, and will impair Plaintiff’s ability to prepare for trial through the use of experts, consultants, witnesses, vendors, and mock jurors.
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 48 (D.Del. Dec. 7, 2015)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 42 (D.Del. Nov. 12, 2015)
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 42 (D.Del. Nov. 12, 2015)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 41 (D.Del. Nov. 11, 2015)
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 41 (D.Del. Nov. 11, 2015)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 98 (D.Del. Feb. 25, 2016)
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 98 (D.Del. Feb. 25, 2016)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 43 (D.Del. Nov. 12, 2015)
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 43 (D.Del. Nov. 12, 2015)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 9 (D.Del. Apr. 24, 2015)
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 9 (D.Del. Apr. 24, 2015)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 128 (D.Del. Apr. 18, 2016)
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 128 (D.Del. Apr. 18, 2016)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 71 (D.Del. Jan. 21, 2016)
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 71 (D.Del. Jan. 21, 2016)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 64 (D.Del. Jan. 8, 2016)
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 64 (D.Del. Jan. 8, 2016)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 174 (D.Del. Jan. 12, 2017)
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 174 (D.Del. Jan. 12, 2017)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 174 (D.Del. Jan. 12, 2017)
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 174 (D.Del. Jan. 12, 2017)
+ More Snippets
Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 90 (D.Del. Feb. 17, 2016)
Cite Document
Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:15-cv-00228, No. 90 (D.Del. Feb. 17, 2016)
+ More Snippets