Search court records on patent:(6910069) - not party Christa Anderson, page 4

No. 514 MANDATE of USCA as to 497 Notice of Appeal (Federal Circuit) filed by Acceleration Bay LLC

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 514 (D.Del. Nov. 10, 2021)

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:16-cv-00455-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

In accordance with the judgment of this Court, entered October 4, 2021, and pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the formal mandate is hereby issued.

November 10, 2021

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Judge
- Richard Andrews
Analyze Party
- Acceleration Bay
- Allen M. -SM- Terrell, JR.
Analyze Firm
- Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
- Potter Anderson & Corroon

No. 58 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Acceleration Bay, LLC's Opening Claim Construction Brief (with ...

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 58 (D.Del. Jun. 28, 2023)

AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. )

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that before 5:00 p.m. on June 28, 2023, the following document was served on the following counsel of record at the addresses and in the manner indicated:

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Judge
- Richard Andrews
Analyze Party
- Acceleration Bay
Analyze Firm
- Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
- Potter Anderson & Corroon

No. 55 REDACTED VERSION of 53 Notice of Subpoenas, by Amazon Web Services, Inc

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 55 (D.Del. Jun. 20, 2023)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the subpoenas attached hereto as Exhibits A and B will be served upon Virgil Bourassa.

P. 34 and 45, Defendant Amazon Web Services (“Amazon”) provides notice that it, through undersigned counsel, requests the production of documents by third party Virgil Bourassa, on July 21, 2023 at 9:00 am, at the office of Fisch Sigler LLP, 400 Concar Drive, San Mateo, CA 94402, or at another mutually agreeable time and place.

Please take further notice that Amazon will take the oral deposition of Virgil Bourassa on August 4, 2023 at 9:00 am at the office of Fisch Sigler LLP, 400 Concar Drive, San Mateo, CA 94402, or at another mutually agreeable time and place.

The deposition will be taken before a notary public or other officer authorized to administer an oath and will continue day-to-day until concluded or may be continued until completed at a future date(s).

P. 30(b)(3), the deposition will be videotaped and/or recorded stenographically.

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Judge
- Richard Andrews
Analyze Party
- Acceleration Bay
Analyze Firm
- Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
- Potter Anderson & Corroon

No. 50 JOINT Claim Construction Chart, by Acceleration Bay, LLC

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 50 (D.Del. Jun. 7, 2023)

14) in the above-captioned action, Plaintiff Acceleration Bay, LLC (“Acceleration Bay” or Plaintiff”) and Defendant Amazon Web Services, Inc. (“Amazon” or “Defendant”) submit this Joint Claim Construction Chart.

9/25/15 Petition for Inter Partes Review 10/14/16 Petitioner’s Consolidated Reply to Patent Owner’s Response [CONF] 3/23/17 Final Written Decision

9/24/15 Petition for Inter Partes Review 10/14/16 Petitioners’ Consolidated Reply to Patent Owner’s Response 3/23/17 Final Written Decision (with errata)

Defendants’ Proposed Construction & Intrinsic Support topology), 7 (“[t]he invention claimed in the ’069 Patent focuses on a process for adding nodes, or participants, to an existing network”).

See also ’344 File History (“Exhibit B-1a”) at April 24, 2002 Information Disclosure Statement (citing U.S. Patent Nos. 5,790,553, Acceleration Bay’s Proposed Construction & Intrinsic Support Amendment and Response; August 26, 2004, Notice of Allowance.

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Analyze Judge
- Richard Andrews
Analyze Party
- Acceleration Bay
Analyze Firm
- Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
- Potter Anderson & Corroon

No. 80 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 53 Motion ...

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Acceleration Bay LLC, 5:19-cv-04133, No. 80 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 1, 2020)

Motion to StrikeDenied

Defendant Acceleration Bay LLC (“Acceleration Bay”) requests that the Court strike counterclaims-in-reply asserted by Plaintiff Epic Games, Inc. (“Epic Games”) in its counterclaim answer, or, in the alternative, to reclassify those counterclaims-in-reply as amendments to the complaint.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) permits a court to strike from a pleading an insufficient defense and “any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” Fed. R. Civ.

Acceleration Bay argues that Epic Games seeks an end-run around rules governing availability of inter partes review (“IPR”) by bringing its patent invalidity claims as counterclaims-in-reply.

In order to fulfill its role of streamlining invalidity proceedings, Congress limited a party’s ability to seek an IPR after commencement of civil litigation in two ways.

Acceleration Bay now argues that the Court has the sole power to prevent Epic Games from benefiting from an apparent loophole in the IPR statutory scheme.

Cite Document

Analyze