• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 129-143 of 1,736 results

No. 39 ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO TRANSFER AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Document Activision Blizzard Inc. v. Acceleration Bay LLC, 1:16-cv-00774, No. 39 (D.Del. Sep. 1, 2016)
It informed the PTAB “that subsequent to th[e] [Delaware court’s] Order, Acceleration Bay and the Boeing Company entered into an Amended and Restated Patent Purchase Agreement resolving all of the issues identified by the District Court in its June 3, 2016 Order.” Lin Decl. Ex. 32.
AB indicated it would “now” refile complaints against the video game companies, and asked the court to reserve the existing trial dates, “as only minor adjustments to the schedule will be necessary in view of the resolution of this standing issue within two weeks of the Court’s Order.” Id. AB also requested the 2015 Delaware actions be dismissed without prejudice.
The video game companies contend they sought declaratory judgments upon learning AB rightfully owned the patents, and they submit their suits were prompted by “significant uncertainty” because the Delaware court “did not impose any obligation on Acceleration Bay at all and certainly did not set a deadline for filing new suits.” Opp’n at 15:3–5, 16 n.16.
Oct. 11, 2013), another case upon which the video game companies rely, the court agreed the declaratory judgment action was anticipatory but found that sole factor did not warrant transfer in light of additional considerations of judicial efficiency.
The district judge and special master, however, held six hearings and issued ten orders covering scheduling, source code, infringement contentions, third party discovery, depositions, interrogatories, testing data, and standing.
cite Cite Document

No. 237

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 237 (D.Del. Aug. 24, 2017)

cite Cite Document

No. 294

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 294 (D.Del. Sep. 8, 2017)

cite Cite Document

No. 293

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 293 (D.Del. Sep. 8, 2017)

cite Cite Document

No. 290

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 290 (D.Del. Sep. 7, 2017)

cite Cite Document

No. 287

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 287 (D.Del. Sep. 6, 2017)

cite Cite Document

No. 285

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 285 (D.Del. Sep. 5, 2017)

cite Cite Document

No. 283

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 283 (D.Del. Sep. 1, 2017)

cite Cite Document

No. 275

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 275 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2017)

cite Cite Document

No. 276

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 276 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2017)

cite Cite Document

No. 273

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 273 (D.Del. Aug. 28, 2017)

cite Cite Document

No. 638

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 638 (D.Del. Feb. 1, 2019)

cite Cite Document

No. 268

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 268 (D.Del. Aug. 24, 2017)

cite Cite Document

No. 200

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 200 (D.Del. Jul. 21, 2017)

cite Cite Document

No. 194

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 194 (D.Del. Jul. 17, 2017)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... >>