The parties identify Certain Vaporizer Devices, Cartridges Used Therewith, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1368 (ITC) and JUUL Labs, Inc. v. NJOY, LLC et al., 23-cv-01204 (D. Ariz.) as related proceedings.
Patent RE49,114 E Harmonic Inc. v. Avid Tech., Inc., 815 F.3d 1356, 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (citing 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) (2012) (requiring inter partes review petitions to identify “with particularity ... the evidence that supports the grounds for the challenge to each claim”)).
Patent Owner argues that Cho does not disclose a “liquid reservoir [that] is partially defined by the exterior of an atomizing chamber” (Prelim. Resp. 8 (citing Ex. 2001 ¶ 47)), that the Petitioner’s “integrated embodiment” mixes and matches embodiments in a ground presented as anticipatory (id. at 9), and that the “integrated embodiment” is not enabled (id.).
Patent Owner argues that Petitioner’s edited Figure 11 nonetheless does not show that the liquid reservoir 1503 is defined by an exterior of the atomizing chamber as required by the claim.
Because Petitioner has failed to show a reasonable likelihood that Cho teaches a “liquid reservoir at least partially defined by an interior of the cartridge housing and an exterior of the atomizing chamber,” we decline to institute on the remaining claims.