• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
90 results

Roku, Inc. v. VideoLabs, Inc.

Docket IPR2025-00071, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Nov. 11, 2024)
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7440559
Patent Owner VideoLabs, Inc.
Petitioner Roku, Inc.
Assignee PRAETOR FUND I, A SUB-FUND OF PRAETORIUM FUND I ICAV
cite Cite Docket

Netflix, Inc. v. VL Collective IP LLC

Docket IPR2023-00630, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Feb. 23, 2023)
David McKone, Jeffrey Smith, Karl Easthom, Stacey White, Stephen Belisle, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
7440559
Patent Owner VL Collective IP LLC
Petitioner Netflix, Inc.
Assignee PRAETOR FUND I, A SUB-FUND OF PRAETORIUM FUND I ICAV
cite Cite Docket

5 Notice Notice filing date accorded: Notice Notice filing date accorded

Document IPR2025-00071, No. 5 Notice Notice filing date accorded - Notice Notice filing date accorded (P.T.A.B. Dec. 6, 2024)
Such motion must: a. Contain a statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice during the proceeding; and b.
A notice of intent to designate a provisionally recognized PTAB attorney as back-up counsel filed pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)(2) must: (a) Identify the registered practitioner who will serve as lead counsel; (b) Identify the most recent prior proceeding in which the person seeking to appear was recognized pro hac vice by order of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board pursuant to a motion of the type described in 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)(1); and (c) Be accompanied by Certification in the form of an affidavit or declaration in which the individual seeking pro hac vice recognition attests to the following: i.
If the affiant or declarant is unable to provide the information requested above or make the required statements or representations under oath, or if the affiant or declarant does not qualify as a provisionally recognized PTAB attorney pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)(2), the procedure set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)(2) is not available, and pro hac vice recognition may only be obtained via the process set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)(1).
Pro hac vice recognition will not be effective until the party files an updated mandatory notice after the expiration of the applicable time period (5 or 10 days) set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)(2)(iii).
The parties are also reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Trial Appeal Case Tracking System (P-TACTS), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
cite Cite Document

31 Final Written Decision original: Final Written Decision original

Document IPR2023-00630, No. 31 Final Written Decision original - Final Written Decision original (P.T.A.B. Oct. 2, 2024)
An obviousness analysis “need not seek out precise teachings directed to the specific subject matter of the challenged claim, for a court can take account of the inferences and creative steps that a person of ordinary skill in the art would employ.” KSR, 550 U.S. at 418.
Furthermore, Petitioner does not satisfy its burden of proving obviousness by employing “mere conclusory statements,” but “must instead articulate specific reasoning, based on evidence of record, to support the legal conclusion of obviousness.” In re Magnum Oil Tools Int’l, Ltd., 829 F.3d 1364, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
Patent Owner contends that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have understood that the indication should contain as little data as possible in order to increase speed and decrease memory.
Mr. Wechselberger testifies that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have understood that the differencing engine would receive an identification of the versions of content stored on the caches in order to make that comparison.
Patent Owner contends that there is no mechanism in Cassin for issuing instructions, and therefore a person of ordinary skill in the art would not have had a reasonable expectation of success in adding Huston’s delete command.
cite Cite Document

28 Other Hearing transcript: Other Hearing transcript

Document IPR2023-00630, No. 28 Other Hearing transcript - Other Hearing transcript (P.T.A.B. Aug. 20, 2024)

cite Cite Document

25 Order Other: Order Setting Oral Argument 37 CFR 4270

Document IPR2023-00630, No. 25 Order Other - Order Setting Oral Argument 37 CFR 4270 (P.T.A.B. Jun. 3, 2024)

cite Cite Document

17 Order on Motion: ORDER Granting Petitioner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admiss...

Document IPR2023-00630, No. 17 Order on Motion - ORDER Granting Petitioner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Stephen A Marshall 37 CFR § 4210 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 28, 2023)

cite Cite Document

11 Order Other: Order Other

Document IPR2023-00630, No. 11 Order Other - Order Other (P.T.A.B. Oct. 3, 2023)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >>