• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 24-38 of 2,186 results

No. 589 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts Inc., 1:16-cv-00454, No. 589 (D.Del. Oct. 7, 2022)
Jack B. Blumenfeld, Cameron P. Clark, MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELLLLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Tomasulo (argued), David P. Enzminger, Gino Cheng,JoeS.
With the Take-Two Case’s appeal resolved, Defendant now moves for summary judgment of noninfringement, arguing that Plaintiff is collaterally estopped from relitigating infringementissues it lost in the Take-Two Case.
Plaintiff argued that GTAO infringes the m-regular limitation because the players’ avatars “share more data when they are near each other” thus causing an m-regular network to “arise naturally as the players are moving throughout the game.” Take-Two SJ Opinion at *8 (cleaned up).
Player Movement Issue Defendant argues that, just as with GTAO in the Take-Two Case, Plaintiff's infringement arguments rely on a “claim that the [Defendant’s] networks may or may not be m-regular depending on the players’ actions in the game.” (D.I.
This reasoning was underscored by the fact that “for the °344, ’966, and ’147 patents ... the patentee added the m-regularlimitation during prosecution” to overcome “a specific prior art reference[,]” thus barring Plaintiff “by prosecution history estoppel from now attempting to erase that limitation from the patents.” (/d.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 284 FINAL VERDICT FORM

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 284 (D.Del. Sep. 27, 2024)
We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them under the instructions of this Court as our verdict in this case.
Question 2: Has Amazon proven by a preponderance of the evidence that The Boeing Company used CloudFront prior to December 2014?
Question 4: Has Acceleration Bay proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Virtual Private Cloud (“VPC”) infringed either of the Asserted Claims?
Question 5: Has Amazon proven by a preponderance of the evidence that The Boeing Company used VPC prior to December 2014?
The Foreperson should retain possession of the verdict form and bring it when the jury is brought back into the courtroom.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 233

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 233 (D.Del. Sep. 19, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 188 Joint letter to The Honorable Richard G. Andrews, regarding August 21, 2024, Oral Order

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 188 (D.Del. Aug. 23, 2024)
Below, Plaintiff Acceleration Bay, LLC (“Acceleration Bay”) identifies the remaining asserted patents claims:
Obviousness based on the combination of Du, Hughes, Hwang, and Olson ’966 Patent Claim Prior Art Grounds 1.
Obviousness based on the combination of Du, Hughes, Hwang, and Olson ’147 Patent Claim Prior Art Grounds 1.
The claim is directed to unpatentable subject matter (35 U.S.C. § 101) The Honorable Richard G. Andrews August 23, 2024 Page 3 1.
Further excerpts of Mr. Greene’s Opening Report were filed as Exhibit I to AWS’s Opposition to Acceleration Bay’s Motion and can be found at D.I.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 183

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 183 (D.Del. Jul. 24, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 178

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 178 (D.Del. Jul. 11, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 176

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 176 (D.Del. Jul. 11, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 167

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 167 (D.Del. Jun. 26, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 164

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 164 (D.Del. Jun. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 155

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 155 (D.Del. Jun. 7, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 153

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 153 (D.Del. Jun. 7, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 156

Document Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc., 1:22-cv-00904, No. 156 (D.Del. Jun. 7, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc.

Docket 1:15-cv-00228, Delaware District Court (March 11, 2015)
Judge Richard G. Andrews, presiding.
Patent

cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 533

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. et al, 1:16-cv-00455, No. 533 (D.Del. Jul. 15, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 845

Document Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard Inc., 1:16-cv-00453, No. 845 (D.Del. Apr. 28, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... >>