Such motion must: a. Contain a statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice during the proceeding; and b.

A notice of intent to designate a provisionally recognized PTAB attorney as back-up counsel filed pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)(2) must: (a) Identify the registered practitioner who will serve as lead counsel; (b) Identify the most recent prior proceeding in which the person seeking to appear was recognized pro hac vice by order of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board pursuant to a motion of the type described in 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)(1); and (c) Be accompanied by Certification in the form of an affidavit or declaration in which the individual seeking pro hac vice recognition attests to the following: i.

If the affiant or declarant is unable to provide the information requested above or make the required statements or representations under oath, or if the affiant or declarant does not qualify as a provisionally recognized PTAB attorney pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)(2), the procedure set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)(2) is not available, and pro hac vice recognition may only be obtained via the process set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)(1).

Pro hac vice recognition will not be effective until the party files an updated mandatory notice after the expiration of the applicable time period (5 or 10 days) set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)(2)(iii).

The parties are also reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Trial Appeal Case Tracking System (P-TACTS), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.

Filed on behalf of: Orca Security Ltd.

Patent Owner has disclaimed all challenged claims, rendering the Petition moot.

Description Orca Security Ltd., Disclaimer in a Patent Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.321(a), filed March 19, 2025, with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office regarding U.S. Patent No. 11,516,231 including Acknowledgement of Receipt and Electronic Payment Receipt PO’s Preliminary Response

Patent Owner has disclaimed all challenged claims, rendering the Petition moot.

I hereby certify that this Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response complies with the word count limitation of 37 C.F.R. § 42.24(b)(1) because the Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response contains 60 words using Microsoft Word’s counting feature, excluding the cover page, signature block, and the parts of the Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response exempted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.24(b)(1).

Filed on behalf of: Orca Security Ltd.

Entered: December 5, 2024

Patent Owner Orca Security Ltd. ("Patent Owner") hereby appoints the below Practitioners asits attorneys to transactall business before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office connected with the Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 11,516,231.

1000 Washington, D.C. 20004-1304 Telephone: 202.654.7209 Fax: 202.637.2201 The individual signing below has the authority to execute this document on behalf of Patent Owner Orca Security Ltd.

Filed on behalf of: Orca Security Ltd.

PO’s Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8, Patent Owner Orca Security Ltd. (“Patent Owner”) submits the following Mandatory Notices in response to the Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 11,516,231 (“’231 Patent”).

C. Designation of Lead and Backup Counsel (37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3))

Service of Information (37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(4)) Service of any documents via hand-delivery may be made at the postal mailing addresses of the respective lead and back-up counsel designated above.

Patent Owner consents to electronic service at the email addresses listed above.

Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b), Petitioner Wiz, Inc., hereby appoints the practitioners associated with Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Customer Number 23-2415, including the following lead and back-up counsel, as its attorneys to transact all business in the United States Patent & Trademark Office associated with a petition for inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 11,516,231: Lead Counsel Back-Up Counsel Matthew A. Argenti USPTO Reg. No. 61,836

1700 K Street NW, Fifth Floor Washington, DC, 20006 Tel.

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5100 Seattle, WA 98104-7036 Tel.

1700 K Street NW, Fifth Floor Washington, DC, 20006 Tel.

1700 K Street, NW, Fifth Floor Washington, DC, 20006 Tel.

In the notice of allowance, the Examiner identified three references as the closest prior art, but only broadly indicated the supposedly lacking teachings by listing most of the independent claim language without explanation.

In addition to the known elements of Veselov, Basavapatna, and VMware SDK discussed above (supra, §§XI.A-B), reading PID files to determine currently running processes, as taught by Kapoor, was well-known and predictable.

As Dr. Stavrou explains, combining the references’ teachings as discussed herein would not have presented meaningful technical challenges or produced unexpected results since a POSA also would have expected this technique to be readily accomplished in the context of the snapshot- based analysis.

Publication No. 2013/0191919 A1, published July 25, 2013, to Basavapatna 1009 Wolf, “Virtualization: From the Desktop to the Enterprise” APRESS (2005) 1010 Waldspurger, “Memory Resource Management in VMware ESX Server,” USENIX, Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (Dec. 9-11, 2002) 1011 Goldberg, “Survey of Virtual Machine Research,” COMPUTER, Vol.

7, No. 6 (June 1974) 1012 U.S. Patent No. 10,944,811 B2 to Doctor 1013 Wood, “Black-box and Gray-box Strategies for Virtual Machine Migration” NSDI ’07: 4th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design & Implementation, USENIX 1014 Klemperer, “Efficient Hypervisor Based Malware Detection,” Carnegie Mellon University (May 2015) Exhibit No. 1015 1016 Description vSphere Web Services SDK Programming Guide, VMWare, Inc. (April 17, 2018) Souppaya, “Application Container Security Guide,” NIST Special Publication 800-190 (Sept. 2017) https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-190 1017 U.S. Patent No. 11,106,784 B2 to Rosendahl 1018 Scarfone, “Guide to Security for Full Virtualization Technologies: Recommendations of the National Inst.

The fee for this disclaimer is set forth in 37 CFR 1.20(d) and is being paid in the following manner: | payment by the USPTO patentelectronic filing system.

Name (printed/typed Practitioner registration number /Christopher C. Johns/| March 19, 2025 ’ Christopher C. Johns A Federal agency may not conductor sponsor, and a personis not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with an information collection subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, unless the information collection has a currently valid OMB Control Number.

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) collects the information in this record under authority of 35 U.S.C. 2.

Routine uses of the information in this record may include disclosure to: 1) law enforcement, in the event that the system of records indicates a violation or potential violation of law; 2) a federal, state, local, or international agency, in responseto its request; 3) a contractor of the USPTO having need for the information in order to perform a contract; 4) the Departmentof Justice for determination of whether the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requires disclosure of the record; 5) a Member of Congress submitting a request involving an individual to whom the record pertains, when the individual has requested the Member’s assistance with respect to the subject matter of the record; 6) a court, magistrate, or administrative tribunal, in the course of presenting evidence, including disclosures to opposing counsel in the course of settlement negotiations; 7) the Administrator, General Services Administration (GSA), or their designee, during an inspection of records conducted by GSA under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906, in accordance with the GSA regulations and any other relevant(i.e., GSA or Commerce) directive, where such disclosure shall not be used to make determinations about individuals; 8) another federal agency for purposes of National Security review (35 U.S.C. 181) and for review pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 218(c)); 9) the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) for personnel research purposes; and 10) the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for legislative coordination and clearance.

If you do not furnish the information requested on this form, the USPTO may notbe able to process and/or examine your submission, which mayresult in termination of proceedings, abandonmentof the application, and/or expiration of the patent.