1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, on May 7, 2019, by stipulation of the parties, the Court issued an Order Amending Briefing Schedule and Hearing for Defendants’ request for discovery sanctions (D.I.

and Seiko High Tec Corp. (collectively “Defendants”) state that the parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle this action in its entirety (see D.I.

In light of this agreement, the parties respectfully request that the Court amend the due date for Defendants’ reply by another three weeks; WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R.

175); the Court issued eight Orders Amending Briefing Schedule and Hearing for Defendants’ request for discovery sanctions (D.I.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the Order Setting Briefing Schedule and Hearing of August 28, 2019 (D.I.

Re: Dkt. No. 257 On August 26, 2019, the parties to this patent case filed a stipulation and proposed order amending the briefing schedule pursuant to Civil L.R.

6-2 requesting that the due date for Defendants’ reply in support of Defendants’ request for discovery sanctions be moved from August 26, 2019 to September 16, 2019.

The Defendants’ reply is due by September 16, 2019.

The Court also continues the hearing date from October 1, 2019 to November 8, 2019.

United States Magistrate Judge Northern District of California United States District Court

WHEREAS, on May 7, 2019, by stipulation of the parties, the Court issued an Order Amending Briefing Schedule and Hearing for Defendants’ request for discovery sanctions (D.I.

6-2(a)(1), Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. (“IPT”) and Defendants NHK International Corporation, NHK Spring Co., Ltd., Ogaki Seiko Co., Ltd., and Seiko High Tec Corp. (collectively “Defendants”) state that the parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle this action in its entirety (see D.I.

17); the parties previously extended by stipulation (i) the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to the complaint (D.I.

96); the Court issued an Amended Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial (D.I.

175); the Court issued six Orders Amending Briefing Schedule and Hearing for Defendants’ request for discovery sanctions (D.I.

WHEREAS, the Court issued a Second Amended Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial on September 27, 2018 (D.I.

In light of this agreement, the parties respectfully request that the Court amend the due date for the Joint Pretrial Conference Statement by two weeks; WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R.

17); the parties previously extended by stipulation (i) the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to the complaint (D.I.

250); and the Court issued six Orders Amending Briefing Schedule and Hearing for Defendants’ request for discovery sanctions (D.I.

6-2(a)(3), the parties state that they believe the requested time modification will require moving the Final Pretrial Conference and Trial dates; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the Order Amending the Second Amended Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial (D.I.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, on May 7, 2019, by stipulation of the parties, the Court issued an Order Amending Briefing Schedule and Hearing for Defendants’ request for discovery sanctions (D.I.

6-2(a)(1), Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. (“IPT”) and Defendants NHK International Corporation, NHK Spring Co., Ltd., Ogaki Seiko Co., Ltd., and Seiko High Tec Corp. (collectively “Defendants”) state that the parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle this action in its entirety (see D.I.

17); the parties previously extended by stipulation (i) the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to the complaint (D.I.

96); the Court issued an Amended Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial (D.I.

219); and the Court issued five Orders Amending Briefing Schedule and Hearing for Defendants’ request for discovery sanctions (D.I.

The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney, whose name and address are: If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.

Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. c/o C T Corporation System 1999 Bryan St., Ste.

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ.

P. 4 (l)) This summons for (name of individual and title, if any) was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or ’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or on (date) ’ I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) ’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ’ Other (specify): My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney, whose name and address are: If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ.

P. 4 (l)) This summons for (name of individual and title, if any) was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or ’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or on (date) ’ I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) ’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ’ Other (specify): My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date: Additional information regarding attempted service, etc: Server’s signature Printed name and title Server’s address 0.00 Print Save As... Reset

The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney, whose name and address are: If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.

Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. c/o C T Corporation System 1999 Bryan St., Ste.

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ.

P. 4 (l)) This summons for (name of individual and title, if any) was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or ’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or on (date) ’ I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) ’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ’ Other (specify): My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

WHEREAS, the Court issued a Second Amended Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial on September 27, 2018 (D.I.

In light of this agreement, the parties respectfully request that the Court amend the due date for the Joint Pretrial Conference Statement by two weeks; WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R.

17); the parties previously extended by stipulation (i) the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to the complaint (D.I.

219); and the Court issued five Orders Amending Briefing Schedule and Hearing for Defendants’ request for discovery sanctions (D.I.

6-2(a)(3), the parties state that they believe the requested time modification will not have an effect on the remaining schedule for the case; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the Order Amending the Second Amended Case Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial (D.I.

WHEREAS, on May 7, 2019, by stipulation of the parties, the Court issued an Order Amending Briefing Schedule and Hearing for Defendants’ request for discovery sanctions (D.I.

6-2(a)(1), Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. (“IPT”) and Defendants NHK International Corporation, NHK Spring Co., Ltd., Ogaki Seiko Co., Ltd., and Seiko High Tec Corp. (collectively “Defendants”) state that the parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle this action in its entirety (see D.I.

The settlement involves two cases and multiple international parties and, therefore, finalizing the documentation is taking longer than previously expected.

In light of this agreement, the parties respectfully request that the Court amend the due date for Defendants’ reply by another three weeks; WHEREAS, pursuant to L.R.

175); and the Court issued four Orders Amending Briefing Schedule and Hearing for Defendants’ request for discovery sanctions (D.I.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, on May 7, 2019, by stipulation of the parties, the Court issued an Order Amending Briefing Schedule and Hearing for Defendants’ request for discovery sanctions (D.I.

6-2(a)(1), Plaintiff Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. (“IPT”) and Defendants NHK International Corporation, NHK Spring Co., Ltd., Ogaki Seiko Co., Ltd., and Seiko High Tec Corp. (collectively “Defendants”) state that the parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle this action in its entirety (see D.I.

The settlement involves two cases and multiple international parties and, therefore, finalizing the documentation is taking longer than previously expected.

17); the parties previously extended by stipulation (i) the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise move in response to the complaint (D.I.

175); and the Court issued three Orders Amending Briefing Schedule and Hearing for Defendants’ request for discovery sanctions (D.I.