ROSE, ALAN BELL, LESLIE WILSHER and

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the within is a true copy of a Judgment duly entered in the office of the County Clerk on the 23rd day February, 2024, a true copy of which is attached hereto.

Dated: New York, New York February 27, 2024

ROSE, ALAN BELL, LESLIE WILSHER and LISA SMITH Defendants.

Defendants, KANE STREET SYNAGOGUE, HEDI HRUBY, JILL ROSE, LESLIE WILSHER, and LISA SMITH, having moved this Court for an order granting dismissal, and the motion having been granted, and an order having been issued by this Court on December 10, 2020 granting the motion and dismissing the complaint as against defendants KANE STREET SYNAGOGUE, HEDI HRUBY, JILL ROSE, LESLIE WILSHER and LISA SMITH, and the trial court’s order having been served with notice of entry on December 16, 2020, NOW, on motion of WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, attorneys for the defendants, it is ADJUDGED, that the claims against defendants KANE STREET SYNAGOGUE, HEDI HRUBY, JILL ROSE, LESLIE WILSHER, and LISA SMITH are severed from the claims against the other parties, and it is ADJUDGED that the complaint against defendants KANE STREET SYNAGOGUE, HEDI HRUBY, JILL ROSE, LESLIE WILSHER, and LISA SMITH, be and the same is hereby dismissed, without costs and disbursements.

Tatal fetim, îhe Beld in anil of Nev.r Yérig oftheState for Court focated st at the ConrGfouse, ef .iÇlngs, County oklyn, City and S.tate Center, Borough ctf tivic day of November2620 on·the ofÑew tork.

#2) and to appear anonymously p'êêd!ñgs Plaintiffs estoppel fraud and promissory can be added against tion in the proposed amended ce=pis!ñt for for to add the causes of action superior infliction branch of the motion respeñdat and ñcgligeñt to proceed is DENIED.

MICHAEL BARER, an attorney duly admitted to practice before the courts of the State of New York respectfully affirms the following to be true under the penalty of perjury, pursuant to

Defendants, KANE STREET SYNAGOGUE, HEDI HRUBY, JILL ROSE, LESLIE WILSHER and LISA SMITH, by and through their counsel, hereby waive all costs and disbursements in this matter.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that annexed is a copy of an Order signed by Judge Carolyn Wade on November 21, 2023, and entered in the Office of the Supreme Court, State of New York, County of Kings, on December 4, 2023.

Plaintiff, Janet Kallo (“Plaintiff”), who is now unrepresented by counsel!, cross-movesto reargue this Court’s Order dated, November 17, 2020, (“MS #1 Court Order”) which dismissed the defendants, Kane Street Synagogue (“KSS”), Hedi Hruby, Jill Rose, Leslie Wilshire, and Lisa Smith (collectively “the individual defendants”) from this action (MS #7).

The MS #1 Court Order dismissedall six causes of action, and dismissed all parties from this matter, but permitted Plaintiff to appear anonymously, andto amend her pleadings to include causes ofaction for fraud and promissory estoppel only against defendant, Bell.

1183 In Motion Sequence #4, Defendant, Bell moved to dismiss the amended complaint which included the fraud and promissory estoppel causes of action.

ADAM BIALEK, an attorney duly admitted to practice before the courts of the State of New York respectfully affirms the following to be true under the penalty of perjury, pursuant to

Date: August 9, 2022 Motion Seq.#: 5 The following e-filed documentslisted by NYSCEF Motion Sequence #5 (Document #70, 71, 72) were read on this motion for ATTORNEY YANA RUBIN,ESQ.to relieved; oral argument took place on May 13, 2022, Uponthe foregoing documents, it is ORDEREDthatthe application by order to show cause of Yana Rubin, Esq.to be relieved as attorney for plaintiff, JANET KALLOisgranted upon proof of compliance with the following conditions; and it is further ORDEREDthat, within ten (10) days from entry, said attorney shall serve a copyofthis order with notice of entry uponher former client, JANET KALLOat herlast known addressbycertified mail return receipt requested, and uponattorneys forall other parties appearing herein by posting to the New YorkState Courts Electronic Filing System;andit is further ORDEREDthatthere shall be no stay in proceedings asplaintiff will be representing herself.

This constitutes the decision and order of this Court.

Date: August 9, 2022 Motion Seq.#: 5 The following e-filed documentslisted by NYSCEF Motion Sequence #5 (Document #70, 71, 72) were read on this motion for ATTORNEY YANA RUBIN,ESQ.to relieved; oral argument took place on May 13, 2022, Uponthe foregoing documents, it is ORDEREDthatthe application by order to show cause of Yana Rubin, Esq.to be relieved as attorney for plaintiff, JANET KALLOisgranted upon proof of compliance with the following conditions; and it is further ORDEREDthat, within ten (10) days from entry, said attorney shall serve a copyofthis order with notice of entry uponher former client, JANET KALLOat herlast known addressbycertified mail return receipt requested, and uponattorneys forall other parties appearing herein by posting to the New YorkState Courts Electronic Filing System;andit is further ORDEREDthatthere shall be no stay in proceedings asplaintiff will be representing herself.

This constitutes the decision and order of this Court.

Trial Term, Part 92of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of Kings,at the Courthouse, located at Civic Center, Borough of Brooklyn, City and State of New York, on the 13.

No. Index No. 515591/2019 KaneStreet Synagogue,et al., ee Defendant(s) The following papers numbered 1 to read on this motion Papers Numbered

Notice of Motion — Order to Show Cause

and Affidavits (Affirmations), Dated 8/23/2021 Docket # 59-67 1-8 Answering Affidavit (Affirmation), dated 5/5/2022, Docket #74 Reply Affidavit (Affirmation), dated 5/12/2022, Docket #75 Affidavit (Affirmation) of Alan_Bell dated 5/12/2022, Docket #76-78 Pleadings — Exhibits Stipulations — Minutes Filed Papers Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (motion sequence #4) is hereby transferred to be decided by Justice Carolyn E. Wade, IAS Part 84 of the New York Supreme Court, Kings County, as Justice Wadepreviously issued the November 17, 2 020 and the February 22, 20210rders concerning the scopeofplaintiff's leaveto file the Amended Complaint and the motion.to re-argue the same.

This constitutes the Decision and Orderof the court.

Trial Term, Part 20 of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of Kings, at the Courthouse, located at Civic Center, Borough of Brooklyn, City and State of New York, on the 13 day of May, 2022.

Notice of Motion – Order to Show Cause and Affidavits (Affirmations), Dated 8/23/2021 Docket # 59-67__________________________________1-8_______ Answering Affidavit (Affirmation), dated 5/5/2022, Docket #74 __________________________________9_________ Reply Affidavit (Affirmation), dated 5/12/2022, Docket #75 _____________________________________10________ Affidavit (Affirmation) of Alan_Bell dated 5/12/2022, Docket #76-78___________________________11-13_______ Pleadings – Exhibits ______________________________________________________________________________ Stipulations – Minutes _____________________________________________________________________________ Filed Papers _____________________________________________________________________________________ Defendants' motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (motion sequence #4) is hereby transferred to be decided by Justice Carolyn E. Wade, IAS Part 84 of the New York Supreme Court, Kings County, as Justice Wade previously issued the November 17, 2 020 and the February 22, 2021Orders concerning the scope of plaintiff's leave to file the Amended Complaint and the motion to re-argue the same.

This constitutes the Decision and Order of the court.

To help protect you r priv acy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

Case Information Index #: 515591/2019 Caption: Janet Kallo v. KANE STREET SYNAGOGUE et al eFiling Status: Full Participation Recorded Assigned Case Judge: Katherine Levine Documents Received Doc # Document

NOTICE: This e-mail is intended only for the named recipient and for the purposes of the New York State Courts E- Filing System.

For further information about Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, please see our website at www.wilsonelser.com or refer to any of our offices.

For further information about Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, please see our website at www.wilsonelser.com or refer to any of our offices.

Carolyn E. Wade NYS Supreme Court, County of Kings 360 Adams Street, Courtroom: 969 Brooklyn, New York 11201

As you may recall, our office represents the defendants Kane Street Synagogue (“KSS”), Hedi Hruby, Jill Rose, Alan Bell, Leslie Wilsher and Lisa Smith (collectively the “Defendants”) in the above- referenced matter.

Wade) denied Plaintiff’s motion to reargue, finding that the “Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the Court overlooked or misapprehended the relevant facts or misapplied any controlling principle of law in dismissing the Complaint.” Notice of Entry was served and filed May 5, 2021.

We requested that Plaintiff withdraw her reply or, as a professional courtesy, agree to adjourn the motion to afford us sufficient time to respond before oral argument on the Cross-Motion takes place.

In her reply (NYSCEF No. 110), which takes the form of an unsworn and un-notarized letter, Plaintiff attempts to cure the deficiencies in the Complaint (which has not been the operative pleading for over 2 years) by providing additional facts to purportedly supplement the claims she asserted against the Defendants.2 Apart from the fact that Plaintiff tries to include material not raised in her moving papers or the Opposition, as the Court has already explained in its order dated February 22, 2021 which granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint, a motion to reargue “is not designed to provide an unsuccessful party with successive opportunities to reargue issues previously decided, or to present arguments different from those originally presented.” McGill v. Goldman, 261 A.D.2d 593, 594 (2d Dept.