• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 39-53 of 3,587 results

USA v. Montes

Docket 1:18-cr-00840, New York Southern District Court (Nov. 20, 2018)
Judge Valerie E. Caproni, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsCLOSED, APPEAL, ECF
Defendant Brandon Montes
Defendant Jonathan Marrero
Defendant Jonathan Santiago
...
cite Cite Docket

USA v. Cubangbang

Docket 1:18-cr-00723, New York Southern District Court (Oct. 4, 2018)
Judge Paul G. Gardephe, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsECF
Defendant Dante A. Cubangbang
Defendant John F. Gargan
Defendant Michael Kellerman
...
cite Cite Docket

USA v. Estevez

Docket 1:18-cr-00669, New York Southern District Court (Sept. 18, 2018)
Judge J. Paul Oetken, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsECF, PRIOR
Defendant Jeffrey Estevez
Defendant Adonis Ramirez
Defendant David Garcia
...

USA v. Barrett

Docket 1:18-mj-07938, New York Southern District Court (Sept. 18, 2018)
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsCLOSED, MERGED
Defendant Elizabeth Barrett
Plaintiff USA
cite Cite Docket

USA v. Ashirova

Docket 1:18-cr-00509, New York Southern District Court (July 19, 2018)
Judge George B. Daniels, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsECF, PRIOR
Defendant Diyora Ashirova
Defendant Elvin Baghir-Pur
Defendant Kirill Dedusev
...

USA v. Hernandez et al

Docket 1:18-cr-00414, New York Southern District Court (June 12, 2018)
Judge P. Kevin Castel, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsECF, PRIOR
Defendant Odhel Hernandez
Defendant Aristides Nolasco
Defendant Ricardo Rodriguez
...
cite Cite Docket

USA v. Hartley et al

Docket 1:18-cr-00390, New York Southern District Court (June 4, 2018)
DivisionFoley Square
Deadline(Status Conference set for 4/11/2025 at 03:15 PM before Judge Paul A. Engelmayer., Conference before D.J. on 4/11/2025 at 3:15 PM. (Status Conference set for 4/11/2025 at 03:15 PM before Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.
USA
Hartley
cite Cite Docket

USA v. Robinson et al

Docket 1:18-cr-00364, New York Southern District Court (May 22, 2018)
Judge Paul G. Gardephe, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsCLOSED, ECF, PRIOR
Defendant Tyreek Robinson
Defendant Michael Toppin
Defendant Antoine Slaughter
...
cite Cite Docket

USA v. Soto et al

Docket 1:18-cr-00282, New York Southern District Court
Judge Valerie E. Caproni, presiding
USA
Soto
cite Cite Docket

No. 142 MEMO ENDORSEMENT 141 LETTER MOTION I respectfully request that Ms. Kalhous be appointed at ...

Document USA v. Lawrence, 1:19-cr-00761, No. 142 (S.D.N.Y.)
Moreover, because of the sheer number of defendants and counts in the indictment, substantial time, attention and effort is required in order to isolate the material that pertains only to Mr. Galarza and to find a way to adequately review it with him during his continuing pretrial detention at MCC.
United States v. Polanco, 16-Cr.-826 (PAE), S.D.N.Y. - Appointed as associate counsel (CJA) to assist in all phases including mitigation, discovery review, and drafting of pretrial and in limine motions in a death eligible indictment involving murder, narcotics, firearms, and Hobbs Act robbery charges.
United States v. Acosta, et al., 17-Cr.-487 (KMW), S.D.N.Y. - Appointed as associate counsel (CJA) to assist the attorney for the lead defendant in all aspects of a multi-defendant case involving firearms trafficking and narcotics conspiracy, including review and analysis of numerous Title III wire interceptions.
United States v. Francois, 16-Cr.-281 (PKC), E.D.N.Y. - Appointed as associate counsel (CJA) to assist in discovery review and drafting of pretrial and in limine motions including Fourth Amendment challenges to the arrest and related searches in a case involving Hobbs Act robbery and firearms charges.
United States v. Freeman, 10-5047, 2d Cir. - Assisted in drafting Mr. Freeman’s appellate brief, which argued that his sentence was procedurally unreasonable because it was based on clearly erroneous factual findings and assumptions about the national security implica- tions of his conduct that were unsupported by the record.
cite Cite Document

No. 489 JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE as to Donnell Jenkins (4)

Document USA v. Avila, 1:19-cr-00166, No. 489 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2025)
Motion for Judgment
__ Itis ordered that the defendant must notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change ofname,residence, or mailing address untilall fines, restitution,costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgmentare fully paid.
as directed by the probation officer, the Bureau of Prisons, or any state sex offender registration agency in the location where you reside, work, are a student, or were convicted of a qualifying offense, check ifapplicable) [] You mustparticipate in an approved program for domestic violence.
because they establish the basic expectations for your behavior while on supervision and identify the minimum tools needed by probation officers to keep informed,report to the court about, and bring about improvements in your conduct and condition.
You must allow the probation officer to visit you at any time at your home or elsewhere, and you must permit the probationofficer to take any items prohibited by the conditions of your supervision that he or she observes in plain view.
: If you are arrested or questioned by a law enforcementofficer, you mustnotify the probation officer within 72 hours, You must not own, possess, or have access to a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or dangerous weapon ({i.e., anything that was designed, or was modified for, the specific purpose ofcausing bodily injury or death to another person such as nunchakusortasers).
cite Cite Document

USA v. Washington-Bhamre

Docket 1:18-cr-00123, New York Southern District Court (Feb. 14, 2018)
DivisionFoley Square
USA
Washington-Bhamre
cite Cite Docket

No. 1031 SECOND FINAL ORDEROF FORFEITURE AS TO FIRST AND SECOND SUBSTITUTE ASSETS as to Davit Mirzoyan

Document USA v. Kazarian et al, 1:10-cr-00895, No. 1031 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2025)
Pursuant to Section 853(n), the United States could, to the extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any person known to have an alleged interest in the First Substitute Assets and as a substitute for published notice as to those persons so notified; WHEREAS, the provisions of Title 21, United State Code, Section 853(n)(1), Rule 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and Rules G(4)(a)(iv)(C) and G(5)(a)(ii) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, require publication of a notice of forfeiture and of the Government’s intent to dispose of the First Substitute Assets before the United States can have clear title to the First Substitute Assets; WHEREAS, the Notice of Forfeiture and the intent of the United States to dispose of the First Substitute Assets was posted on an official government internet site (www.forfeiture.gov) beginning on July 12, 2024, for thirty (30) consecutive days, through August 10, 2024, pursuant to Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions and proof of such publication was filed with the Clerk of the Court on February 28, 2025 (D.E.
Pursuant to Section 853(n), the United States could, to the extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any person known to have an alleged interest in the Second Substitute Assets and as a substitute for published notice as to those persons so notified; WHEREAS, the provisions of Title 21, United State Code, Section 853(n)(1), Rule 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and Rules G(4)(a)(iv)(C) and G(5)(a)(ii) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, require publication of a notice of forfeiture and of the Government’s intent to dispose of the Second Substitute Assets before the United States can have clear title to the Second Substitute Assets; WHEREAS, the Notice of Forfeiture and the intent of the United States to dispose of the Second Substitute Assets was posted on an official government internet site (www.forfeiture.gov) beginning on September 19, 2024, for thirty (30) consecutive days, through October 18, 2024, pursuant to Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions and proof of such publication was filed with the Clerk of the Court on February 28, 2025 (D.E.
WHEREAS, the Defendant is the only person and/or entity known by the Government to have a potential interest the Second Substitute Assets; Case 1:10-cr-00895-PGG Document 1029-1 Filed 02/28/25 Page 4 of 7Case 1:10-cr-00895-PGG Document 1031 Filed 03/03/25 Page 4 of 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n)(7), the United States shall have clear title to any forfeited property if no petitions for a hearing to contest the forfeiture have been filed within thirty (30) days of final publication of notice of forfeiture as set forth in Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n)(2);
One 14K w/gold "EFFY" black leather bracelet with ~ 1ct rfc diamond pave set square and w/gold clasp; xviii.
One 18K white gold "huggy" style earring, 20 princess cut !.60pts and 30 rfc diamonds ~.60pts, 3.2DWT; and xxxix.
cite Cite Document

No. 327 ORDER as to Sean Dalton

Document USA v. Brown, 1:17-cr-00674, No. 327 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2025)
Upon the application of defense counsel, consented to by the government, the pretrial conference previously scheduled for February 19, 2025 is adjourned until April 22, 2025 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 11D.
I find that the ends of justice will be served by granting a continuance and that taking such action outweighs the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
My reasons for this finding are that the grant of the continuance is needed to permit the parties to continue plea negotiations.
Accordingly, the time between today and April 22, 2025 is excluded.
Dated: New York, New York February 19, 2025
cite Cite Document

No. 440 ORDER as to (19-Cr-761-04) Derrick Casado

Document USA v. Lawrence, 1:19-cr-00761, No. 440 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2025)
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: On February 11, 2025, Defendant Derrick Casado, proceeding pro se, filed a motion— styled as a supplement to a since-denied motion (see ECF No. 438)—pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) for a reduction of his sentence under the “safety valve” provision of that Section.
That provision, which was amended by the First Step Act of 2018, permits district courts to impose sentences notwithstanding the mandatory minimum sentences for particular drug offenses if the defendant satisfies enumerated criteria.
As the Court noted at sentencing, “Casado pleaded guilty to two counts, using and carrying a forearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, which was brandished and discharged; and conspiracy to distribute narcotics.” (ECF No. 393 at 2:12-2:15.)
And at his plea hearing, Casado testified: “I participated in crimes through my association with a gang in the Bronx.
Accordingly, Casado is ineligible for a reduction in his sentence under the safety valve for failure to satisfy Section 3553(f)(2).
cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... >>