• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 24-38 of 154 results

No. 87 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow as to Jon Burge:Enter Order by agreement

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 87 (N.D.Ill. May. 27, 2009)
Odor Fou (01/2005) wad United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Case: 1:08-cr-00846 Document#: 87 Filed: 05/27/09 Page 1 of 1 PagelD #:1239 A
f Assigned Jud Sitting Judge if Other
Defendantshall file his exhibits in support of request for hearing and motion to dismiss for per-indictment delay under seal.
These documents shall remain sealed for a period of 90 days unless extended by orderof the court on motion.
Defendant may paperfile his 5 volumesof exhibits in support of motion in limine to admit prior testimony.
cite Cite Document

No. 396 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS as to Jon Burge held on 6-14-10, before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 396 (N.D.Ill. Jul. 1, 2011)
And -- but, nonetheless, when you filed your motion, 21 in January of 1995, you didn't name any of those three 22 detectives, correct? 23 A. Well, you know, this motion is dated January of '85.
Q. Nonetheless though there were not -- in that motion that's filed, you did not name specifically Officers Dignan, Byrne or Grunhart, correct? 9 10 A. Correct.
15 Q. But, nonetheless, it came in at trial, correct? 16 A. That's correct.
14 Q. None of those cases were identified by anybody to you or 15 your attorney giving you any indication as to what they wanted 16 to talk to you about, correct? 17 A. Yes.
21 Q. None of these other eight cases that you were questioned 22 about did you do anything of an abusive nature to any of those 23 individuals, correct? 24 A. That's correct.
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets

No. 61 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow as to Jon Burge:Status hearing held and continued ...

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 61 (N.D.Ill. Apr. 29, 2009)
Order Form (01/2005) United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois Name of Assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge
USA vs. Burge 4/29/2009 Status hearing held and continued to 7/22/2009 at 9:30 a.m.
Defendant’s oral motion for leave to file by 5/6/2009 a motion to continue trial date is granted; response due by 5/13/2009; reply due by 5/20/2009; ruling by mail by 6/12/2009.
Defendant’s oral motion for leave to file materials under seal is granted provided that a redacted version is filed in the public record.
Government’s oral motion to exclude time is granted without objection.
cite Cite Document

No. 31 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order as to Jon Burge Signed by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 4/23/09.Mailed ...

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 31 (N.D.Ill. Apr. 23, 2009)
The complaint alleged that in January 1987 while investigating the act of arson which killed Hobley’s wife and infant son, the detectives of the Area Two Violent Crimes Division, which Burge commanded, attempted to coerce a confession from Hobley by beating him, suffocating him with a plastic typewriter cover, using racially offensive language and repeatedly threatening him.
Hobley contended that the conduct he described was part of “a pattern and practice of torture of subjects by Area Two Violent Crimes detectives” and noted that the CPD’s own Office of Professional Standards (“OPS”) had concluded that police command members, including Burge, were aware of systematic and methodical physical abuse and had perpetuated it, either by actively participating or failing to stop it.
Wilson maintained that while he was at Area Two, he was beaten, kicked, smothered with a plastic bag, burned with a cigarette, given a succession of electronic shocks on his ears, genitals, and back, stretched across a hot radiator, and had a loaded gun placed in his mouth and cocked.
Furthermore, Burge knew or reasonably should have anticipated that Wilson’s testimony in his civil rights case could (and indeed would) encourage other potential plaintiffs to file similar suits, spark an internal police board investigation into his conduct, and form the basis of a later criminal prosecution.
Congress thus presumably made a careful judgment as to what generally objecting to Wilson’s testimony based on his repeated invocation of the Fifth Amendment, Burge identifies eight specific lines of inquiry which he was unable to pursue, arguing that they are relevant to Wilson’s motive to fabricate: (1) Wilson’s “guilty state of mind after the murders and while he was in police custody.” Resp. at 17.
cite Cite Document

No. 304 MOTION by USA to modify as to Jon Burge the Protective Order Entered on January 5, 2009 (Attachments: ...

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 304 (N.D.Ill. Sep. 1, 2010)
The United States of America, by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, United States Attorney, for the Northern District of Illinois, moves this court to modify the protective order entered on January 5, 2009.
On January 5,2009, this court entered a protective order, restricting the disclosure of materials produced by the government in discovery in this case.
The terms of that order prohibited defendant Burge from using protected material “in connection with any other proceeding (specifically including but not limited to any civil case against defendant).”
In the interest of expediency and economy, the United States seeks modification of the protective order in the instant case to permit use of the materials produced by the United States during the course of discovery in the criminal case.
Specifically, the government seeks to allow Jon Burge to use the materials produced by the government during the criminal proceeding in the pending civil matter of Cannon v. Burge, 05 C 2192 (N.D. Ill.).
cite Cite Document

No. 20 AGREED PROTECTIVE Order as to Jon Burge Signed by the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow on 1/5/09.Mailed ...

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 20 (N.D.Ill. Jan. 5, 2009)
Case: 1:08-cr-00846 Document #: 20 Filed: 01/05/09 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:40 Case: 1:08-cr-00846 Document #: 20 Filed: 01/05/09 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:41 Case: 1:08-cr-00846 Document #: 20 Filed: 01/05/09 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:42
cite Cite Document

No. 254

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 254 (N.D.Ill. Jun. 7, 2010)

cite Cite Document

No. 227

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 227 (N.D.Ill. May. 18, 2010)

cite Cite Document

No. 200

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 200 (N.D.Ill. May. 10, 2010)

cite Cite Document

No. 354

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 354 (N.D.Ill. Jan. 7, 2011)

cite Cite Document

No. 191

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 191 (N.D.Ill. Apr. 23, 2010)

cite Cite Document

No. 188

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 188 (N.D.Ill. Apr. 16, 2010)

cite Cite Document

No. 176

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 176 (N.D.Ill. Apr. 5, 2010)

cite Cite Document

No. 173

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 173 (N.D.Ill. Apr. 1, 2010)

cite Cite Document

No. 303

Document USA v. Burge, 1:08-cr-00846, No. 303 (N.D.Ill. Aug. 27, 2010)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 10 11 >>