On March 16, 2020, this Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (“POF”), ordering the forfeiture of defendant Ali F. Elmezayen’s interest in $80,000.00 in bank funds seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank account ‘3504, having found that the funds, a portion of the monies paid in response to claims on the referenced insurance policies, represented proceeds of the crimes of defendant’s conviction.

Also on March 16, 2020, this Court entered a money judgment of forfeiture, requiring defendant to “forfeit to the United States the sum of $181,751.70” (representing the amount of insurance proceeds paid that were not recovered by the government) and allowing the government to, “at any time, move pursuant to Rule 32.2(e) to amend this Order of Forfeiture to substitute property having a value not to exceed $181,751.70 to satisfy the money judgment in whole or in

Beginning on March 24, 2020, and ending on April 22, 2020, the United States caused to be published on an official government internet site (www.forfeiture.gov) notice of the forfeiture of the $80,000.00 seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank account ‘3504; and, beginning on June 9, 2020, and ending on July 8, 2020, the United States caused to be published on www.forfeiture.gov notice of the forfeiture of the $167,544.42 applied to the amended money judgment.

The United States of America and Petitioner have requested that a Final Order of Forfeiture be entered pursuant to the terms of their stipulation filed concurrently herewith.

Petitioner has released the United States of America, its agencies, agents, and officers, including, without limitation, employees and other representatives of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, from any and all claims, defenses, actions, or liabilities arising out of or related to this action against seized funds, including, without limitation, any and all claims for attorneys’ fees, costs, or interest which may be asserted by her or on her behalf.

For good cause appearing, and upon the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that the hearing on Rabab Diab’s petition in the ancillary proceeding be continued to March 15, 2021, 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 7A of the above-entitled Court, located at 350 W. 1st Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012.

United States Attorney

Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division

Assistant United States Attorney

Assistant United States Attorney

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 For good cause appearing, and upon the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that the hearing on Rabab Diab’s petition in the ancillary proceeding be continued to January 11, 2021, 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 7A of the above-entitled Court, located at 350 W. 1st Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012.

United States Attorney

Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division

Assistant United States Attorney

Assistant United States Attorney

In the absence of such designation, the defendant shall report on or before the same date and time, to the United States Marshal located at the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012.

This condition will not apply to intimate family members, unless the court has completed an individualized review and has determined that the restriction is necessary for protection of the community or rehabilitation; 10.

If all or any portion of a fine or restitution ordered remains unpaid after the termination of supervision, the defendant must pay the balance as directed by the United States Attorney’s Office.

The defendant must notify the Court (through the Probation Office) and the United States Attorney of any material change in the defendant’s economic circumstances that might affect the defendant’s ability to pay a fine or restitution, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k).

The defendant must not transfer, sell, give away, or otherwise convey any asset with a fair market value in excess of $500 without approval of the Probation Officer until all financial obligations imposed by the Court have been satisfied in full.

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sentencing in this matter is continued from August 26, 2020 to October 5, 2020 at 8:00 a.m. By

United States District Judge

C e 2:18-cr-00809—JFW Document 427 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:11249

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application to seal the document entitled “Declaration of Counsel in Support of Unopposed Ex Parte Application to Continue Sentencing Hearing” is GRANTED.

The declaration, along with the application to seal the declaration, shall be filed under seal- DATED: July 30, 2020 By 4/ 7%—

C e 2:18-cr-00809—JFW Document 429 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:11252

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sentencing in this matter is continued to August 26, 2020 at 8:00 a.m.

DATED: July 30, 2020

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sentencing in this matter is continued to August 3, 2020, at 8:00 a.m.

DATED: July 2, 2020 By

United States District Judge

On March 16, 2020, this Court entered the Money Judgment, requiring defendant to “forfeit to the United States the sum of

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 $181,751.70” and allowing the government to, “at any time, move pursuant to Rule 32.2(e) to amend this Order of Forfeiture to substitute property having a value not to exceed $181,751.70 to satisfy the money judgment in whole or in part.” (Dkt. 404 at 2).

The United States has moved to have the following property applied in partial satisfaction of the outstanding Money Judgment: (a) $167,544.42 in bank funds seized on or about April 24, 2020 from JPMorgan Chase account x3054 (the “Seized Funds”).

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Money Judgment entered against defendant is hereby amended to forfeit defendant’s interest in the Seized Funds to the United States.

This Court shall retain jurisdiction over both the ancillary proceeding and any future requests by the government relating to additional property of defendant that may be identified and sought to be applied toward full satisfaction of the judgment.

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sentencing in this matter is continued to July 8, 2020 at 8:00 a.m.

DATED: June 2, 2020 By

United States District Judge

Upon consideration of the jury’s special verdict determination on forfeiture with respect to questions 1 through 9, defendant’s guilty conviction on Counts 1, 2, 4, 8, 9, 10, and 14 of the First Superseding Indictment, Rule 32.2(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court ORDERS as follows: Any and all of defendant’s right, title, and interest in and to the property described below (the “Forfeited Property”) is hereby

The government is authorized to conduct any discovery in any ancillary proceeding initiated pursuant to this Order.

The United States shall also, to the extent practicable, provide written notice to any person known to have an alleged interest in the Forfeitable Property that any such person is required to file a petition within thirty (30) days of the giving of such direct notice.

legal interest in the Forfeited Property may, within thirty (30) days of the publication of notice or receipt of notice, whichever is earlier, petition the Court for a hearing without a jury to adjudicate the validity of his or her alleged interest in the property, and for an amendment of this Order of forfeiture, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(2).

(4) The United States shall have clear title to the Forfeited Property following the Court’s disposition of all third- party interests.

Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Koryun Pyuskulyan, is hereby committed on Count 1 of the Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for a term of 39 months.

In the absence of such designation, the defendant shall report on or before February 20, 2020, to the United States Marshal located at the Roybal Federal Building, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012.

If all or any portion of a fine or restitution ordered remains unpaid after the termination of supervision, the defendant must pay the balance as directed by the United States Attorney’s Office.

The defendant must notify the Court (through the Probation Office) and the United States Attorney of any material change in the defendant’s economic circumstances that might affect the defendant’s ability to pay a fine or restitution, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k).

The defendant must not transfer, sell, give away, or otherwise convey any asset with a fair market value in excess of $500 without approval of the Probation Officer until all financial obligations imposed by the Court have been satisfied in full.

C e 2:18-cr-00809—JFW Document 387 Filed 12/30/19 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:10810 AMY KARLIN fBar No. 150016) Interlm Federa Pubhc Defender CUAUHTEMOC ORTEGA (Bar No. 257443) Chlef Deput Federal Publlc Defender Emall: cuau temoc_ortega fd.or(gg HRIsTY O’CONNOR (Bar 0.

Defendant’s Unopposed Ex Parte Application for Order Continuing Sentencing Hearing Date is GRANTED.

Defendant’s sentencing hearing is continued from January 27, 2020, at 8:00 am. to March 23, 2020, at 8:00 am.

Sentencing papers shall be filed by March 2, 2020.

In the absence of such designation, the defendant shall report on or before the same date and time, to the United States Marshal located at the Roybal Federal Building, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012.

Any unpaid balance shall be due during the period of imprisonment, at the rate of not less than $25 per quarter, and pursuant to the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program It is further ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a total fine of $3.000, which shall bear interest as provided by law.

If all or any portion of a fine or restitution ordered remains unpaid after the termination of supervision, the defendant must pay the balance as directed by the United States Attorney’s Office.

The defendant must notify the Court (through the Probation Office) and the United States Attorney of any material change in the defendant’s economic circumstances that might affect the defendant’s ability to pay a fine or restitution, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k).

The defendant must not transfer, sell, give away, or otherwise convey any asset with a fair market value in excess of $500 without approval of the Probation Officer until all financial obligations imposed by the Court have been satisfied in full.

However, this language is unnecessary here, where none of the four misrepresentations alleged by the government in the indictment sound in recklessness.

While the government need not establish that the means of identification was stolen, it must show the use of the means of identification was nonetheless illegal.