• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
285 results

TRW Automotive U.S. LLC v. Magna Electronics Inc.

Docket IPR2015-00439, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 19, 2014)
Bart Gerstenblith, Frances Ippolito, Justin Arbes, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
8599001
Petitioner TRW Automotive U.S. LLC
Patent Owner Magna Electronics Inc.
cite Cite Docket

Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 8,599,001

Docket IPR2015-00437, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 19, 2014)
Bart Gerstenblith, Frances Ippolito, Justin Arbes, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
8599001
Petitioner TRW Automotive U.S. LLC
Patent Owner Magna Electronics Inc.
Assignee DONNELLY CORPORATION
cite Cite Docket

Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 8,599,001

Docket IPR2015-00438, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 19, 2014)
Bart Gerstenblith, Frances Ippolito, Justin Arbes, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
8599001
Petitioner TRW Automotive U.S. LLC
Patent Owner Magna Electronics Inc.
Assignee DONNELLY CORPORATION
cite Cite Docket

TRW Automotive U.S. LLC v. Magna Electronics Inc.

Docket IPR2015-00436, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Dec. 19, 2014)
Bart Gerstenblith, Frances Ippolito, Justin Arbes, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
8599001
Petitioner TRW Automotive U.S. LLC
Patent Owner Magna Electronics Inc.
cite Cite Docket

17 Termination Settlement After Institution: Judgment Termination of the Proceeding

Document IPR2015-00439, No. 17 Termination Settlement After Institution - Judgment Termination of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Feb. 22, 2016)
Before JUSTIN T. ARBES, BART A. GERSTENBLITH, and FRANCES L. IPPOLITO, Administrative Patent Judges.
The parties also filed a copy of their written settlement agreement (Ex. 1072) and included in their motion a request that the settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
The parties’ joint motion to terminate was filed prior to DUE DATES 5–7 in the proceeding, and the Board has not made a final decision on the merits.
Given these facts, we determine that it is appropriate to terminate the proceeding without rendering a final written decision under 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby: ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that the settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information, kept separate from the file of U.S. Patent No. 8,599,001 B2, and made available only to Federal Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of good cause, under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), is granted; and FURTHER ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate the instant proceeding (Paper 31) is granted and the proceeding is hereby terminated.
cite Cite Document

13 Notice: Notice of Refund

Document IPR2015-00439, No. 13 Notice - Notice of Refund (P.T.A.B. Jul. 27, 2015)
Petitioner’s request for a refund of certain post-institution fees paid on December 19, 2014 in the above proceeding is hereby granted.
The amount of $800 has been refunded to the Petitioner's deposit account ending in 0600.
The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the
Case IPR2015-00439 Patent 8,599,001 Patent Review Processing System (PRPS), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
cite Cite Document

17 Termination Settlement After Institution: Judgment Termination of the Proceeding

Document IPR2015-00438, No. 17 Termination Settlement After Institution - Judgment Termination of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Feb. 22, 2016)
Before JUSTIN T. ARBES, BART A. GERSTENBLITH, and FRANCES L. IPPOLITO, Administrative Patent Judges.
The parties also filed a copy of their written settlement agreement (Ex. 1072) and included in their motion a request that the settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
The parties’ joint motion to terminate was filed prior to DUE DATES 5–7 in the proceeding, and the Board has not made a final decision on the merits.
Given these facts, we determine that it is appropriate to terminate the proceeding without rendering a final written decision under 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby: ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that the settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information, kept separate from the file of U.S. Patent No. 8,599,001 B2, and made available only to Federal Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of good cause, under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), is granted; and FURTHER ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate the instant proceeding (Paper 31) is granted and the proceeding is hereby terminated.
cite Cite Document

17 Termination Settlement After Institution: Judgment Termination of the Proceeding

Document IPR2015-00437, No. 17 Termination Settlement After Institution - Judgment Termination of the Proceeding (P.T.A.B. Feb. 22, 2016)
Before JUSTIN T. ARBES, BART A. GERSTENBLITH, and FRANCES L. IPPOLITO, Administrative Patent Judges.
The parties also filed a copy of their written settlement agreement (Ex. 1072) and included in their motion a request that the settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
The parties’ joint motion to terminate was filed prior to DUE DATES 5–7 in the proceeding, and the Board has not made a final decision on the merits.
Given these facts, we determine that it is appropriate to terminate the proceeding without rendering a final written decision under 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby: ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that the settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information, kept separate from the file of U.S. Patent No. 8,599,001 B2, and made available only to Federal Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of good cause, under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), is granted; and FURTHER ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate the instant proceeding (Paper 31) is granted and the proceeding is hereby terminated.
cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>