• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
6 results

Rex Medical, L.P. v. Covidien, LP

Docket 1:19-cv-01092, Delaware District Court (June 13, 2019)
Judge Maryellen Noreika, presiding
Patent
DivisionWilmington
FlagsCLOSED, MEDIATION-MPT, PATENT
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
9439650
Plaintiff Rex Medical, L.P.
Defendant Medtronic, plc
Defendant Covidien, LP
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 47 SO ORDERED re 46 Stipulation of Dismissal

Document Rex Medical, L.P. v. Covidien, LP, 1:19-cv-01092, No. 47 (D.Del. Apr. 20, 2020)
Motion to Dismiss (Demurrer)
WHEREAS, the claims for relief asserted by Plaintiff Rex Medical, L.P. (“Plaintiff”) against Defendant Covidien LP (“Defendant”), and Defendant’s counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff, have been resolved.
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff and Defendant, through their attorneys of record, stipulate to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendants with prejudice and Defendant’s counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff with prejudice, with all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses borne by the party incurring same.
____________ ________________ ________________________
cite Cite Document

No. 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against Covidien, LP, Medtronic, ...

Document Rex Medical, L.P. v. Covidien, LP, 1:19-cv-01092, No. 1 (D.Del. Jun. 13, 2019)
Complaint
Upon information and belief, Covidien is a limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of Delaware with its principal place of business at 15 Hampshire Street, Mansfield, Massachusetts 02048.
Upon information and belief, Defendants have and continue to directly and indirectly infringe, literally and under the doctrine of equivalents, at least claims 6, 19, and 21 of the ’650 Patent by making, using, selling, importing, offering for sale, and/or providing and causing to be used the Accused Products.
The Accused Products are a material component for use in practicing the ’650 Patent and are specifically made and are not a staple article of commerce suitable for substantial non- infringing use.
Upon information and belief, Defendants have and continue to directly and indirectly infringe, literally and under the doctrine of equivalents, at least claims 1 and 5 of the ’892 Patent by making, using, selling, importing, offering for sale, and/or providing and causing to be used the Accused Products.
The 30 mm Product, used in conjunction with the Endo GIA™ Ultra Universal Staplers and Reloads system,7 has a control handle configured to actuate receiving, clamping, and sealing of tissue.
cite Cite Document

No. 25 NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Plaintiff Rex Medical, L.P.'s Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures and ESI Initial ...

Document Rex Medical, L.P. v. Covidien, LP, 1:19-cv-01092, No. 25 (D.Del. Dec. 20, 2019)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 20, 2019, a copy of: (i) Plaintiff Rex Medical, L.P.’S Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures and ESI Initial Disclosures and (ii) Plaintiff Rex Medical, L.P.’s Disclosures Pursuant to Paragraph 7(a) of the Court’s Scheduling Order was served on the following as indicated: Via E-Mail Pilar G. Kraman Robert M. Vrana
Attorneys for Defendant Covidien LP Dated: December 20, 2019
Respectfully submitted, FARNAN LLP
cite Cite Document

No. 26

Document Rex Medical, L.P. v. Covidien, LP, 1:19-cv-01092, No. 26 (D.Del. Dec. 20, 2019)

cite Cite Document

No. 24 NOTICE OF SERVICE of 1) Defendant Covidien LP's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1 11) to ...

Document Rex Medical, L.P. v. Covidien, LP, 1:19-cv-01092, No. 24 (D.Del. Dec. 11, 2019)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 11, 2019, copies of 1) Defendant Covidien LP’s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1 – 11) to Plaintiff Rex Medical, L.P.; and 2) Defendant Covidien LP’s First Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 1-67) to Plaintiff Rex Medical, L.P. were caused to be served on the following counsel of record in the manner indicated below:
Of Counsel: Gregory H. Lantier (admitted pro hac vice) Alexis Cohen (admitted pro hac vice) E. Ross.
Cohen (No. 6121)
cite Cite Document