• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 24-38 of 2,851 results

Proposed Order Granting Defendant Sky Climber, LLC's Motion to exclude or Limit Plaintiff's Expert Ronald Simmons

Document MELENDEZ, EDWIN W vs. SKY CLIMBER LLC, 201823719, No. 111167944 (Texas State, Harris County, 164th District Court Nov. 3, 2023)
Motion to Exclude
On this day came to be heard Defendant Sky Climber, LLC’s Motion to Exclude or Limit Plaintiff’s Expert Ronald Simmons (“the Motion”).
It is therefore, ORDERED, that Defendant Sky Climber, LLC’s Motion to Exclude or Limit Plaintiff’s Expert Ronald Simmons, is GRANTED.
It is further, ORDERED, that the report and the opinions and testimony of Ronald Simmons referenced in the Motion are excluded from the trial of this case.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below.
Envelope ID: 81301766 Filing Code Description: No Fee Documents Filing Description: Status as of 11/6/2023 8:28 AM CST Case Contacts Shannon RRamirez Stephanie Crescioni Kaye McCollum Mary Allen Toby Cole NaShunda Baskin Gerardo Alcazar Steven S.Reilley Stephanie Luitjens
cite Cite Document
Analyze

111074357

Document MELENDEZ, EDWIN W vs. SKY CLIMBER LLC, 201823719, No. 111074357 (Texas State, Harris County, 164th District Court Oct. 30, 2023)
On this day, the Court considered Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude the Untimely Statement of Fact Witness John Boswell.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below.
Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below.
Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

110969399

Document MELENDEZ, EDWIN W vs. SKY CLIMBER LLC, 201823719, No. 110969399 (Texas State, Harris County, 164th District Court Oct. 24, 2023)
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 80922434 By: Marcella Hill Filed: 10/24/2023 3:09 PM
On this day, the Court considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Allow Demonstrative Exhibits to be Admitted into Evidence.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

110198682

Document MELENDEZ, EDWIN W vs. SKY CLIMBER LLC, 201823719, No. 110198682 (Texas State, Harris County, 164th District Court Sep. 11, 2023)
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 79411734 By: Marcella Hill Filed: 9/11/2023 2:05 PM
On this day came to be heard Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce the Rule 11 Settlement Agreement Between Plaintiff and Defendant 3M.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

110170246

Document MELENDEZ, EDWIN W vs. SKY CLIMBER LLC, 201823719, No. 110170246 (Texas State, Harris County, 164th District Court Sep. 8, 2023)
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 79369075 By: Marcella Hill Filed: 9/8/2023 3:58 PM
On this day came to be heard Defendant 3M Company’s Motion to Compel the Deposition of Reginald Wilson.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

REEDY, JAMES vs. PARK WEST APARTMENTS LLC

Docket 201710649, Texas State, Harris County, 334th District Court (Feb. 15, 2017)
STEVEN KIRKLAND, presiding
Case TypePremises
Plaintiff JAMES REEDY
Defendant ADARA COMMUNITIES LLC
Defendant ADARA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: DENYING 2 MOTION for More Definite Statement

Document McClain v. United Airlines et al, 4:24-cv-00050, No. 5 (S.D.Tex. Feb. 5, 2024)
A motion for a more definite statement should be granted “only when the complaint is so unintelligible that the court cannot ‘make out one or more potentially viable legal theories,’ and is ‘so vague or ambiguous that the opposing party cannot respond, even with a simple denial, in good faith or without prejudice to itself.’” Arnold v. BNSF Ry.
Oct. 25, 2018) (motions for a more definite statement “are normally granted only when a complaint is ‘so excessively vague and ambiguous as to be unintelligible and as to prejudice the defendant seriously in attempting to answer it’” (quoting Phillips v. ABB Combustion Eng’g, Inc., Civ.
Dec. 8, 2009)); see also Atain, 2017 WL 6334186, at *2 (“In the presence of proper, although general allegations, the motion [for a more definite statement] will usually be denied on the grounds that discovery is the more appropriate vehicle for obtaining the detailed information.” (quoting Thurmond, 2000 WL 33795082, at *2)).
United Airlines alleges that it needs to know “who controlled the vehicle in question[,]” (Docket Entry No. 2 at 3), but McClain’s complaint already states that “Doe was operating [the] vehicle” at the time of the accident.
The plaintiff must “set[] forth prima facie elements of the claim in a manner that fairly places the adverse party on notice of the action against him.” Keller v. Kubota Tractor Corp., No. 16-CV- 184, 2016 WL 10931440, at *1 (S.D.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

Sarah Cummings VS. Five Star Rentals / Sales, INC. and Nathan A. Litz

Docket 161041B, Texas State, Kerr County, County Court (Dec. 5, 2016)
Melvin Rex Emerson, presiding
Case TypeAccounts, Contracts, Notes
TagsAccounts, Contract, Notes, Contract, Civil
Defendant Five Star Rentals / Sales, Inc.
Defendant Nathan A. Litz
Intervener Timothy Watson
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

ORDER RESETTING TRIAL

Document MELENDEZ, EDWIN W vs. SKY CLIMBER LLC, 201823719, No. 111342542 (Texas State, Harris County, 164th District Court Nov. 15, 2023)
All previous pre-trial deadlines remain in effect, unless changedby the court.
All previous pre-trial deadlines remain in effect, unless changedby the court.
All previous pre-trial deadlines remain in effect, unless changedby the court.
All previous pre-trial deadlines remain in effect, unless changedby the court.
All previous pre-trial deadlines remain in effect, unless changedby the court.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

ORDER SIGNED DENYING PREFERENTIAL TRIAL SETTING

Document MELENDEZ, EDWIN W vs. SKY CLIMBER LLC, 201823719, No. 111158031 (Texas State, Harris County, 164th District Court Nov. 3, 2023)
the Court considered Defendant Sky Climber LLC’s Motion for Continuance and Request for a Preferential Trial Setting.
Having considered the Motion, the Court Motion for Continuance is of the opinion that good cause has been shownto grant the xeef requested by Defendant Sky for continuance Climber, LLC, and the Motion should treeH-respeets be GRANTED.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that this case is removed from its current trial setting of The Motion for December4, 2023, andresetfor trial on_May 27, 2024 , 2024.
Signed onthis, the day of , 2023.
LheLhe Signed: 11/3/2023 c hur
cite Cite Document
Analyze

109865165

Document MELENDEZ, EDWIN W vs. SKY CLIMBER LLC, 201823719, No. 109865165 (Texas State, Harris County, 164th District Court Aug. 22, 2023)
On this day, the Court considered Defendant’s Motion for Continuance.
Having considered the motion, response, and arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that Defendant’s Motion should be DENIED.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

VASQUEZ, WILBUR A vs. VIGIER, LAURA C

Docket 201619541, Texas State, Harris County, 215th District Court (Mar. 28, 2016)
ELAINE H PALMER, presiding
Case TypeMotor Vehicle Accident
Plaintiff WILBUR A VASQUEZ
Defendant LAURA C VIGIER
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

LETTENMAIER, MISTY vs. SOTO, FRANK

Docket 201618195, Texas State, Harris County, 127th District Court (Mar. 21, 2016)
RAVI K. SANDILL, presiding
Case TypeMotor Vehicle Accident
Plaintiff MISTY LETTENMAIER
Defendant FRANK SOTO
Defendant RINALDY SALSEGAMA
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

CORRESPONDENCE

Document KERSH, JESSE (IND AND ANF OF AMY ELISE K vs. BISHOP, LESLIE, 199544300, No. 36627296 (Texas State, Harris County, 334th District Court)
Cause No. 95-44300; JESSE KERSH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF AMY ELISE KERSH, A MINOR vs. LESLIE BISHOP; IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
Dear Mr. Bacarisse: Please be advised that Kenna M. Seiler, State Bar No. 13944250, of Hope & Causey, P. C., has been designated as lead counsel for the Defendant Leslie Bishop, in the above cause of action.
Please forward all future correspondence to my attention.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

36627295

Document KERSH, JESSE (IND AND ANF OF AMY ELISE K vs. BISHOP, LESLIE, 199544300, No. 36627295 (Texas State, Harris County, 334th District Court)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... >>