Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 925 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 10, 2025)
502022CA012238XXXXMB NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Filing # 216411587 E-Filed 02/10/2025 12:32:10 PM FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK, 02/10/2025 12:32:10 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY NOT A CERTIFIED COPY NOT A CERTIFIED COPY NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
Cite Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 925 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 10, 2025)
+ More Snippets
Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 912 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 7, 2025)
_________________________/ supplemental Order on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Documents from PulteGroup THIS CAUSE having come before the Court during a special set hearing on January 27, 2025, on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel PulteGroup, Inc. to Produce Documents the Court Previously Ordered (“Motion”).
The Court, having reviewed the submissions of counsel and heard arguments of counsel, it is hereby ORDERED as follows as to those issues and documents that the first order of same date DOES NOT address.
Plaintiff shall review the Log of Files Not Produced (served October 30, 2024) and the Log of Responsive But Not Relevant Files (served November 19, 2024) previously provided by non-party PulteGroup (the “Logs”).
Plaintiff must then identify the specific documents from the Logs about which Plaintiff alleges he is entitled to additional information.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Palm Beach County, Florida.
Cite Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 912 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 7, 2025)
+ More Snippets
Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 913 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 7, 2025)
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on January 27, 2025, on the ore tenus agreement of counsel as to the subpoenas of Victor Rancour, Rancour Ventures, LLC, and Diana Pulte.
The Court, upon the agreement of counsel and having been duly advised in the premises, hereby ORDERS and ADJUDGES as follows: To the extent that a deposition of a nonparty needs to be rescheduled for any reason, any subpoena that has been served will not need to be re-served.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida.
600 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Cite Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 913 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 7, 2025)
+ More Snippets
Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 915 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 7, 2025)
THIS CAUSE came before the Court at a special set hearing on January 27, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. on Plaintiff's Motion To Compel PulteGroup, Inc. to Produce Documents the Court Previously Ordered filed December 9, 2024 (the "Motion").
The Court, having reviewed the submissions of the parties, heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, hereby ORDERS and ADJUDGES that the Motion is GRANTED, in part, as follows: 1.
The court notes that independent of the is order, the documents may be subject to production under the amended rules of civil procedure as either a supplement or a disclosure.
The Court will set a Case Management Conference on any remaining issues.
Circuit Judge Copies to parties on attached service list
Cite Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 915 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 7, 2025)
+ More Snippets
Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 916 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 7, 2025)
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the agreement of the parties, on Plaintiff, William J. Pulte's ("Pulte") Motion for Protective Order or, in the Alternative, Motion to Strike Defendant's Fourth Set of Request for Admissions to Plaintiff, filed on November 22, 2024.
The Court, having reviewed the submissions of the parties, and being otherwise fully advised in the
Defendant, Brandon Jones' ("Jones") Fourth Request for Admissions filed on November 19, 2024 is withdrawn.
Pulte does not need to respond to Jones' Fourth Request for Admissions.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida.
Cite Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 916 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 7, 2025)
+ More Snippets
Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 917 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 7, 2025)
THIS CAUSE came before the Court at a special set hearing on January 27, 2025 at 10:00 a.m. on Plaintiff's Motion For Sanctions Against Ryan Marshall For Violating A Court Order To Produce Documents By July 22, and For Order To Show Cause Why Ryan Marshall Should Not Be Held In Contempt of Court filed August 15, 2024 (the "Motion").
The Court, having reviewed the submissions of the parties, heard argument of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, hereby ORDERS and ADJUDGES that the Motion is Granted, in part, as follows: 1.
Should the Fourth District Court of Appeal deny Marshall’s Motion for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc, Marshall has 10 days to produce the documents requested by Plaintiff in the manner already ruled upon.
Should Marshall fail to produce the documents within 10 days, there will be sanctions such as the cost of holding up the proceedings in this matter and of these motions if production does not occur within 10 days in a manner already ruled upon.
Circuit Judge Copies to parties on attached Service List
Cite Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 917 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 7, 2025)
+ More Snippets
Document
GINSBERG, ANN V CAMINO INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 50-2022-CA-010217-XXXX-MB, No. 98 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 6, 202...
NUSBAUM, as appointed Personal Representatives of the Estate of Morton L. Ginsberg, Plaintiffs,
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited Partnership, SPANISH RIVER DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, SPANISH RIVER G.P., LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and MARK A. GENSHEIMER, as Managing Member of Spanish River G.P., LLC, and Managing Member of Spanish River Development Partners, LLC, Defendants.
As to the remainder of the Motion to Compel, within 10 days Plaintiffs shall compile and provide to Camino Investments Holdings Limited Partnership and Spanish River G.P., LLC ("Corporate Defendants") a list of all documents Plaintiffs have not received that Plaintiffs believe they are entitled to.
The Parties can then reset for hearing any objections addressed to specific documents.
The Parties shall confer and agree on any future case management deadlines, other than the Calendar Call date, and upload an order on such deadlines with the Court.
Cite Document
GINSBERG, ANN V CAMINO INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 50-2022-CA-010217-XXXX-MB, No. 98 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 6, 2025)
+ More Snippets
Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 906 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 5, 2025)
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on January 27, 2025, on Defendant, Brandon Jones’s Motion to Compel and Overrule Objections to Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Third Request for Production [D.E.
858] and Defendant, Brandon Jones’s Motion to Compel and Overrule Objections to Plaintiff’s Responses to Defendant’s Interrogatories [D.E.
parties and having heard argument of counsel, hereby ORDERS and ADJUDGES as follows:
The Parties are directed to submit any and all briefs or documents that they wish the Court to consider for Defendant’s Motions to Compel by 5:00 PM Friday, January 31, 2025.
The Court will rule on Defendant’s Motions to Compel on the papers.
Cite Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 906 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 5, 2025)
+ More Snippets
Docket
9:18-cv-80044,
Florida Southern District Court
(Jan. 16, 2018)
Judge Kenneth A. Marra, presiding, Magistrate Judge William Matthewman
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Division | West Palm Beach |
Flags | CLOSED, MEDIATION, REF_DISCOV, WM |
Cause | 28:1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Case Type | 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
Tags | 470 Racketeer / Corrupt Organization, 470 Racketeer / Corrupt Organization |
Plaintiff | Tamara Filippova |
Defendant | Ilia Mogilevsky |
Defendant | ERIKAH BERTOLOTI |
Cite Docket
FIilippova v. Mogilevsky et al, 9:18-cv-80044 (S.D.Fla.)
+ More Snippets
Document
SC WESTLAND PROMENADE LP VS IEC US HOLDINGS INC, 2024-017949-CA-01, Doc-21-Order: (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. Feb. 3, 2025)
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon agreement of the Parties, Plaintiff, SC (Westland Promenade) Limited Partnership ("Landlord"), and Defendant, IEC US Holdings, Inc. ("Tenant"), and the Court having reviewed the Court file and being otherwise advised in the premises, ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that the Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement, entered into by the Parties, attached as Exhibit 1 is APPROVED and ADOPTED by the Court.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida on this 3rd day of February, 2025.
Electronically Signed Case No: 2024-017949-CA-01 Page 1 of 2
No Further Judicial Action Required on THIS MOTION
Cite Document
SC WESTLAND PROMENADE LP VS IEC US HOLDINGS INC, 2024-017949-CA-01, Doc-21-Order: (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. Feb. 3, 2025)
+ More Snippets
Document
SC WESTLAND PROMENADE LP VS IEC US HOLDINGS INC, 2024-017949-CA-01, Doc-22-Attachment-andor-Exhibit-to-Order (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. Feb. 3, 2025)
Access to any documents, materials or information produced or disclosed in this Litigation by the Parties and designated “CONFIDENTIAL” by the Parties (including any copies, recordings, disks, prints, negatives, extracts or summaries of the contents or substance thereof), shall be restricted and shall not be shown, or the contents or existence thereof otherwise divulged, to any entity or person except: (a) The attorneys of record for the Parties in the Litigation or any appeals arising therefrom, and any attorneys retained by the Parties to consult on the Litigation or any appeals arising therefrom and their respective associates, clerks, legal assistants, stenographer and support personnel; (b) Experts or consultants retained by the Parties in connection with the Litigation or any appeals arising therefrom, provided that each such person shall agree to be bound by the terms of this Agreement, and shall confirm such agreement by signing a copy of the endorsement form attached as Exhibit A hereto; (c) Those officers, directors, representatives and employees of the Parties whose assistance is required in the Litigation or any appeals arising therefrom, and who must have access to the materials to render effective assistance; (d) Stenographic and video reporters, to the extent engaged by any Party for purposes of depositions, hearings, or the trial of the Litigation; (e) Such other persons as the Parties shall agree to in writing, or a court of competent jurisdiction shall determine after a hearing, provided that each such person shall agree to be bound by the terms of this Agreement, and shall confirm such agreement by signing a copy of the endorsement form attached as Exhibit A hereto; (f) Any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this Litigation or that the Court appoints; (g) Any witness who a Party’s attorney in good faith believes may be called to testify at trial or deposition in this Litigation, provided that each such person shall agree to be bound by the terms of this Agreement, and shall confirm such agreement by signing a copy of the endorsement form attached as Exhibit A hereto; and
This Agreement shall not abrogate or diminish any contractual, statutory or other legal obligation or right of any Party or person with respect to any Confidential Material.
This Agreement shall be without prejudice to the right of any Party to bring before the Court the question of: (i) whether any particular material is or is not confidential; (ii) whether any particular information or material is or is not entitled to a greater or lesser degree of protection than provided hereunder; or (iii) whether any particular information is or is not relevant to any issue of this case, provided that in doing so, the Party complies with the foregoing procedures.
Further, nothing herein shall prevent any counsel of record who has produced or received Confidential Material from rendering advice or discussing the information with his or her client(s) regarding this matter, subject to the limitations of paragraph 3 above.
Any Party may apply to the Court for modification of this Agreement at any time or for the establishment of additional protection governing the use of Confidential Material.
Cite Document
SC WESTLAND PROMENADE LP VS IEC US HOLDINGS INC, 2024-017949-CA-01, Doc-22-Attachment-andor-Exhibit-to-Order (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. Feb. 3, 2025)
+ More Snippets
Document
GINSBERG, ANN V CAMINO INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 50-2022-CA-010217-XXXX-MB, No. 97 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 3, 202...
This matter is rolled over and reset for jury trial sometime between June 9, 2025 - July 18, 2025 in Courtroom 9A, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 N. Dixie Hwy, West Palm Beach,
The parties are directed to fill out the Case Information Sheet (Exhibit A) and return it to the Court's office via e-mail at CAD-DivisionAK@pbcgov.org no later than May 25, 2025.
Unless this case is being continued for good cause shown, all deadlines in the initial order remain in full force.
If the case is being continued for good cause shown, the parties shall confer and agree to new deadlines consistent with any rulings made by the court at the hearing.
Short Style:_____________________________ v. _____________________________ Case No: ________________________________________ Lead Attorneys: Plaintiff: ________________________________ Phone: _______________________ Defendant: _______________________________ Phone: ______________________ Primary Case Contact1: ____________________________ Phone: _______________ Anticipated Length of Trial: __________________ Date Mediated: ________________ Pre-Trial Stipulation filed: ___________________ Jury Instructions ready: __________ Any non-compliance with pre-trial order: ___________________________ (yes/no) If yes, what Filing this Case Information Sheet timely.
Cite Document
GINSBERG, ANN V CAMINO INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 50-2022-CA-010217-XXXX-MB, No. 97 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Feb. 3, 2025)
+ More Snippets
Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 898 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Jan. 29, 2025)
In accord with the parties’ agreement, the Court APPOINTS The Honorable Kenneth D. Stern (retired) as Special Magistrate in this matter to preside over all depositions conducted on February 4, 2025.
Judge Stern has advised that he is available and has no conflicts preventing him from serving as Special Magistrate in this case.
The Special Magistrate is DIRECTED to make reports and recommendations to the Court with respect to all issues brought before him by the parties.
The Special Magistrate’s fees shall be borne equally by the Plaintiff and the Defendant.
Counsel for both sides shall see to the prompt payment of the Special Magistrate’s invoice for services for preparation, if any, and presiding.
Cite Document
PULTE, WILLIAM J V JONES, BRANDON, 50-2022-CA-012238-XXXX-MB, No. 898 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Jan. 29, 2025)
+ More Snippets
Document
CMSN YACHTING LLC V KIT YACHT GROUP LLC, 50-2024-CA-003328-XXXA-MB, No. 21 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Jan. 29, 2025)
The following matters have been specially set for an evidentiary hearing before Judge G. Joseph Curley Jr.in Courtroom 11C, Palm Beach County Courthouse, 205 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401.
Each party has the option to appear either in person in the courtroom or electronically via Zoom*, using the following information:
SPECIALLY SET MOTION ON THE DATE AND TIME APPEARING ABOVE.
Accordingly, all counsel or self-represented parties must either: (1) be present in person or by Zoom conference at the hearing or (2) submit an Agreed Order disposing of the motion at least 48 business hours prior to the hearing.
For evidentiary hearings and non-jury trials, the parties should stipulate to the admissibility of
Cite Document
CMSN YACHTING LLC V KIT YACHT GROUP LLC, 50-2024-CA-003328-XXXA-MB, No. 21 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Jan. 29, 2025)
+ More Snippets
Document
GINSBERG, ANN V CAMINO INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 50-2022-CA-010217-XXXX-MB, No. 94 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Jan. 29, 20...
[Scheduling Order and Notice of Hearing] [a copy of the motion/s must be attached when submitted to the Court]
THIS MATTER is specially set for REMOTE hearing before JUDGE JAMES SHERMAN as follows: DATE OF HEARING: Monday, February 3, 2025
TIME RESERVED FOR HEARING: 30 minutes MATTER(s) TO BE HEARD: Plaintiffs' Motion for Case Management Conference, Motion to Compel
Case No. 50-2022-CA-010217-XXXX-MB ORDERED that the attorneys/parties must submit to the Court by hard copy if greater than 50 pages (or upload to eCourtesy if less than 50 pages total) seven (7) days before the hearing noting the date and time of the hearing: 1. copies of all relevant pleadings; 2. copies of all case law authority; If an interpreter is needed for a party or witness in this case, it shall be the responsibility of the party needing same to provide a qualified interpreter.
This notice is provided pursuant to Administrative Order No. 2.207 “If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance.
Cite Document
GINSBERG, ANN V CAMINO INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 50-2022-CA-010217-XXXX-MB, No. 94 (Florida State, Palm Beach County, Fifteenth Circuit Court Jan. 29, 2025)
+ More Snippets