• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
354 results

Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Docket 2:21-cv-00041, Texas Eastern District Court (Feb. 4, 2021)
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, presiding
Patent
DivisionMarshall
FlagsCLOSED, CONSOL, JRG1, JURY, PATENT/TRADEMARK
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
7933431; 8194924; 8553079; 8878949
7933431
819492485530798878949
Mediator David Folsom
Plaintiff Gesture Technology Partners, LLC
Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
...
cite Cite Docket

Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Huawei Device Co., Ltd. et al

Docket 2:21-cv-00040, Texas Eastern District Court (Feb. 4, 2021)
District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, presiding, Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne
Patent
DivisionMarshall
FlagsCASREF, CLOSED, JRG1, JURY, LEAD, PATENT/TRADEMARK, PROTECTIVE-ORDER
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
7933431; 8194924; 8553079; 8878949
7933431
819492485530798878949
Mediator David Folsom
Plaintiff Gesture Technology Partners, LLC
Defendant Huawei Device Co., Ltd.
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 242 ORDER granting 241 Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice

Document Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Huawei Device Co., Ltd. et al, 2:21-cv-00040, No. 242 (E.D.Tex. Mar. 24, 2022)
Motion to Dismiss (Demurrer)Granted
Before the Court is the Joint Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Gesture Technology Partners, LLC (“GTP”) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Dkt. No.
Having considered the Motion, and in light of its joint nature, the Court is of the opinion that it should be and hereby is GRANTED.
Accordingly, GTP’s claims for relief against Samsung and relating to Samsung’s accused products in this case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
It is ORDERED that each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned cases.
cite Cite Document

No. 240

Document Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Huawei Device Co., Ltd. et al, 2:21-cv-00040, No. 240 (E.D.Tex. Mar. 16, 2022)

cite Cite Document

No. 236

Document Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Huawei Device Co., Ltd. et al, 2:21-cv-00040, No. 236 (E.D.Tex. Feb. 11, 2022)

cite Cite Document

No. 234

Document Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Huawei Device Co., Ltd. et al, 2:21-cv-00040, No. 234 (E.D.Tex. Feb. 7, 2022)

cite Cite Document

No. 232

Document Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Huawei Device Co., Ltd. et al, 2:21-cv-00040, No. 232 (E.D.Tex. Feb. 3, 2022)

cite Cite Document

No. 229

Document Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Huawei Device Co., Ltd. et al, 2:21-cv-00040, No. 229 (E.D.Tex. Feb. 1, 2022)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>