• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 219-226 of 226 results

No. 152 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment as to ...

Document Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co., Inc. et al v. Genesis Equipment & Manufacturing, Inc. et al, 4:06-cv-00114, No. 152 (N.D.Ohio Aug. 12, 2009)
Motion for Summary JudgmentGranted
(Grieco Decl. Ex. V.) In phase one, Mark Ramun’s initial title would be “Special Projects Director,” and his responsibilities would include: (1) input into the launch of and design of a new product line, and (2) direct sales to customers and distributors.
PageID #: 844 planning, financial controls, production, traffic, legal, international, human resources, marketing, etc.” (Grieco Decl. Ex. V.) Moreover, Bacon’s proposal offered, and Mark Ramun’s Employment Agreement ultimately secured, extraordinary incentives.
The party seeking summary judgment bears the initial burden of informing the district court of the basis for its motion, and identifying the evidence which it believes demonstrates “the absence of a genuine issue of material fact.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986); Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc., 799 F.2d 1128, 1133 (6th Cir. 1986).
Damages Defendants urge the Court to dismiss Allied’s trade secret claim because it is entirely speculative and based upon a flawed assumption—i.e., that, but for the misappropriation, Allied would have captured each and every Genesis sale (of the LXP or VersiPro) through March 2008.
Co., 517 F.3d 816, 837 (6th Cir. 2007); see also Bauman v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, 621 F.2d 230, 235 (6th Cir. 1980) (“Where the evidence is sufficient to establish liability and causation, we do not believe we should remove the case from the jury because the precise extent of the injuries caused by the defendant's wrong is uncertain.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 247 Memorandum Opinion and Order of Case Dismissal

Document City of Cleveland v. Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc., et al., 1:08-cv-00139, No. 247 (N.D.Ohio May. 15, 2009)
Looking to avoid the fatal effect of the economic loss doctrine, the City makes several arguments, none of which has merit.
The City provides no support for this position, and none exists.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 283

Document Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co., Inc. et al v. Genesis Equipment & Manufacturing, Inc. et al, 4:06-cv-00114, No. 283 (N.D.Ohio Oct. 14, 2010)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 118

Document Brewton v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company et al, 1:08-cv-00516, No. 118 (N.D.Ohio Feb. 12, 2009)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 104

Document Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co., Inc. et al v. Genesis Equipment & Manufacturing, Inc. et al, 4:06-cv-00114, No. 104 (N.D.Ohio Aug. 19, 2008)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 74

Document Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co., Inc. et al v. Genesis Equipment & Manufacturing, Inc. et al, 4:06-cv-00114, No. 74 (N.D.Ohio Jan. 7, 2008)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

KeyBank USA, National Association v. Midwest Mortgage Finance, LLC et al

Docket 1:00-cv-00860, Ohio Northern District Court (March 31, 2000)
Judge Donald C. Nugent, presiding.
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization

cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 1-1

Document Perman v. IMG Worldwide, Inc., 1:10-cv-01066, No. 1-1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2010)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14 15 16

Can’t find a case you think should be here?

Use our supplemental search tool to find dockets that you may not see here. Information on Fees

Start a Supplemental Search