There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Count 1: 18:1962(d) RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS CONSPIRACY The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced.

This condition will not apply to intimate family members, unless the court has completed an individualized review and has determined that the restriction is necessary for protection of the community or rehabilitation; 10.

If all or any portion of a fine or restitution ordered remains unpaid after the termination of supervision, the defendant must pay the balance as directed by the United States Attorney’s Office.

The defendant must notify the Court (through the Probation Office) and the United States Attorney of any material change in the defendant’s economic circumstances that might affect the defendant’s ability to pay a fine or restitution, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k).

The defendant must not transfer, sell, give away, or otherwise convey any asset with a fair market value in excess of $500 without approval of the Probation Officer until all financial obligations imposed by the Court have been satisfied in full.

Defendant Shane Donald Fraser, by and through his counsel, Joseph Abrams, defendant Todd Ian Ferguson, by and through his counsel, Shaffy Moeel, and plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel, Heiko Coppola, Assistant United States Attorney, hereby stipulate to a request for continuance of the status conference hearing, presently set for March 17, 2025 at 10:00 a.m., to June 2, 2025 at 10:00 a.m.

The government has produced voluminous discovery in this case which includes four disks of material containing investigative reports from the United States and Canadian authorities, documents, photographs, and other relevant materials.

Counsel for defendants request additional time to review the discovery provided, in- vestigate the matter, consult with their clients and otherwise prepare for trial.

Counsel for defendants believe that failure to grant the requested continuance would deny them the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exer- cise of due diligence.

For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of March 17, 2025 to June 2, 2025, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T-4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendants’ request on the basis of the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

On December 18, 2023, this Court set conditions of pre-trial release for Mr. Ferugson to include the posting of $50,000 cash bond, submission to location-monitoring by the Pre-Trial Services Office, and home detention.

At this time, the parties stipulate to modify Mr. Ferguson’s release conditions to permit him to live in Arizona.

Defendant's undersigned counsel, Shaffy Moeel, hereby attests that Heiko Coppola, counsel for the United States, concurs in the filing of this Stipulation.

Accordingly, and for good cause shown, THE COURT ORDERS THAT: Based on the reasons provided in the stipulation of the parties above the Court hereby finds there is good cause to modify Mr. Ferguson’s travel conditions so that Mr. Ferguson may live in the state of Arizona.

Honorable Jeremy D. Peterson United States Magistrate

This condition will not apply to intimate family members, unless the court has completed an individualized review and has determined that the restriction is necessary for protection of the community or rehabilitation; 10.

If all or any portion of a fine or restitution ordered remains unpaid after the termination of supervision, the defendant must pay the balance as directed by the United States Attorney’s Office.

The defendant must notify the Court (through the Probation Office) and the United States Attorney of any material change in the defendant’s economic circumstances that might affect the defendant’s ability to pay a fine or restitution, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k).

The defendant must not transfer, sell, give away, or otherwise convey any asset with a fair market value in excess of $500 without approval of the Probation Officer until all financial obligations imposed by the Court have been satisfied in full.

I hereby attest and certify this date that the foregoing document is a full, true and correct copy of the original on file in my office, and in my legal custody.

32.1(a)(6) Allegations of Violations of Probation/Supervised Release Conditions) On arrest warrant issued by a United States District Court involving alleged violations of conditions of probation or Supervised Release, The Court finds no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure: ~ the appearance of defendant as required; and/or q the safety of any person or the community.

// // // 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 3 1 5 ~ ~ ~~ Case 2:16-cr-00390-RGK Document 4752 Filed 12/30/24 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:56324 The Court concludes: ~ Defendant poses a risk of nonappearance, and the Court finds that defendant has not demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that he/she does not pose such a risk.

The risk of nonappearance is based on: instant allegations.

D Defendant poses a danger to the community, and the Court finds that defendant has not demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that he does not pose such a risk.

The risk of danger is based on: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant be detained.

The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: a. The government has produced voluminous discovery in this case which includes four disks of material containing investigative reports from the United States and Canadian

Counsel for defendants’ request additional time to review the discovery provided, investigate the matter, consult with their clients and otherwise prepare for trial.

c. Counsel for defendants believe that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny them the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

e. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.

f. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of December 9, 2024 to March 17, 2025, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant’s request on the basis of the Court’s finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Count 1: 18:1962(d) RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS CONSPIRACY The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced.

The defendant shall participate in an outpatient substance abuse treatment and counseling program that includes urinalysis, breath or sweat patch testing, as directed by the Probation Officer.

If all or any portion of a fine or restitution ordered remains unpaid after the termination of supervision, the defendant must pay the balance as directed by the United States Attorney’s Office.

The defendant must notify the Court (through the Probation Office) and the United States Attorney of any material change in the defendant’s economic circumstances that might affect the defendant’s ability to pay a fine or restitution, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k).

The defendant must not transfer, sell, give away, or otherwise convey any asset with a fair market value in excess of $500 without approval of the Probation Officer until all financial obligations imposed by the Court have been satisfied in full.