• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
1,074 results

NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation

Docket 2:22-md-03034, Michigan Eastern District Court (June 23, 2022)
District Judge Terrence G. Berg, presiding
Patent
DivisionDetroit
CauseNo cause code entered
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
10075941; 10447450; 10771302; 10833908; 10965512; 8467366
10447450
8467366
DeadlineMotion Hearing set for 2/28/2025 09:00 AM before District Judge Terrence G. Berg (AChu) (Entered: 01/10/2025)
DeadlineSet Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings as to [259] MOTION for Summary Judgment on Defendants' Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hands Defenses, [251] SEALED MOTION Motion to Strike or Exclude Certain Portions of The Testimony of Defendants' Experts re [250] MOTION to Seal PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE OR EXCLUDE CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT, [249] SEALED MOTION to Exclude re [248] MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Brief in Support of Its Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Neo's Damages Expert, Ms. Harvey, and Certain Opinions of Neo's Technical, [254] SEALED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANTS' INEQUITABLE CONDUCT AND UNCLEAN HANDS DEFENSES re [253] MOTION to Seal PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANTS' INEQUITABLE CONDUCT AND UNCL, [257] MOTION re [251] SEALED MOTION Motion to Strike or Exclude Certain Portions of The Testimony of Defendants' Experts re [250] MOTION to Seal PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE OR EXCLUDE CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE, [243] SEALED MOTION for Summary
In Re NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation
Plaintiff Neo Wireless, LLC
Defendant American Honda Motor Co Inc
...
cite Cite Docket

General Motors LLC v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2023-00962, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (June 5, 2023)
Hyun Jung, Kristen Droesch, Stephen Belisle, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner General Motors LLC
Petitioner Nissan North America
cite Cite Docket

General Motors LLC v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2023-00963, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (June 5, 2023)
Hyun Jung, Kristen Droesch, Matthew Meyers, Stephen Belisle, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner General Motors LLC
Petitioner Tesla
...
cite Cite Docket

American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2023-00793, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Mar. 30, 2023)
Hyun Jung, Kristen Droesch, Matthew Meyers, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Petitioner General Motors
...
cite Cite Docket

Ford Motor Company v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2023-00763, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Mar. 29, 2023)
Charles Boudreau, Hyun Jung, Kristen Droesch, Stephen Belisle, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
DeadlineDUE DATE 2: February 27, 2025 Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
DeadlineDUE DATE 3: April 10, 2025 Patent Owner’s sur-reply to reply Patent Owner’s reply to opposition to motion to amend (or Patent Owner’s revised motion to amend)5
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner Ford Motor Company
Petitioner Nissan North America
cite Cite Docket

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. Neo Wireless LLC

Docket IPR2022-01567, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Sept. 27, 2022)
Charles Boudreau, Hyun Jung, Jo-Anne Kokoski, Kristen Droesch, Matthew Meyers, Stephen Belisle, presiding
Case TypeInter Partes Review
Patent
10447450
Patent Owner Neo Wireless LLC
Petitioner Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Petitioner Nissan North America
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 285 STIPULATED Supplemental Protective Order re 284 MOTION for Protective Order Unopposed Motion ...

Document NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation, 2:22-md-03034, No. 285 (E.D.Mich. Aug. 29, 2024)
WHEREAS, the Court entered a Protective Order in this action on October
18, 2022; WHEREAS, non-parties Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Mercedes-Benz AG (together, “Mercedes”) have certain CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION that has been or may be produced by Plaintiff Neo Wireless, LLC to Defendants (together, the “Parties”) in this action (“Mercedes Confidential Information”); WHEREAS the Parties and Mercedes have agreed to certain terms in addition to those included in the Protective Order to protect Mercedes Confidential Information; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that documents that incorporate Mercedes Confidential Information produced in this action that are designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” shall be subject to the following restrictions: Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 285, PageID.30981 Filed 08/29/24 Page 2 of 3 1.
Any use of Mercedes Material remains subject to all existing restrictions.
Said notice shall (a) be served by facsimile or email on outside counsel for Mercedes at least five (5) business days prior to the hearing or first day of trial, (b) identify the Mercedes Case 2:22-md-03034-TGB ECF No. 285, PageID.30982 Filed 08/29/24 Page 3 of 3 Material with specificity while redacting any other Party’s confidential business information and (c) identify the measures the party intends to rely upon to protect the Mercedes Material when used at any hearing or trial consistent with this Supplemental Protective Order.
If Mercedes moves to seal the court or transcript due to the planned use of any Mercedes Material at any hearing or trial, the Parties will not oppose such motion.
cite Cite Document

No. 286 ORDER Granting 281 Motion to Seal DEFENDANTS UNOPPOSED MOTION FORLEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL ...

Document NEO Wireless, LLC Patent Litigation, 2:22-md-03034, No. 286 (E.D.Mich. Aug. 29, 2024)
Motion to SealGranted
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Portions of Their Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Neo’s Damages Expert, Ms. Harvey, and Certain Opinions of Neo’s Technical Experts, Dr. Mahon and Mr. Jones (“Defendants’ Reply”), and Certain Exhibits thereto (“the Proposed Exhibits”).
After considering the motion, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion as follows:
Defendants are permitted to file Defendants’ Reply, and the Proposed Exhibits under seal.
cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 5 ... >>