Document
Illinois Bankers Association et al v. Raoul, 1:24-cv-07307, No. 102 (N.D.Ill. Nov. 6, 2024)
FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.8 (rev.
1.8.1) Eastern Division Illinois Bankers Association, et al.
This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, November 6, 2024: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall.
If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information.
For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Cite Document
Illinois Bankers Association et al v. Raoul, 1:24-cv-07307, No. 102 (N.D.Ill. Nov. 6, 2024)
+ More Snippets
Document
Illinois Bankers Association et al v. Raoul, 1:24-cv-07307, No. 98 (N.D.Ill. Oct. 30, 2024)
FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.8 (rev.
1.8.1) Eastern Division Illinois Bankers Association, et al.
In Court Oral Argument regarding Motion for Preliminary Injunction [15] held on 10/30/2024.
If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information.
For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Cite Document
Illinois Bankers Association et al v. Raoul, 1:24-cv-07307, No. 98 (N.D.Ill. Oct. 30, 2024)
+ More Snippets
Document
Illinois Bankers Association et al v. Raoul, 1:24-cv-07307, No. 97 (N.D.Ill. Oct. 29, 2024)
Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to Oral Argument In Court hearing set for 10/30/2024 at 12:30 PM.
Any party calling in is reminded to please mute their phones/devices.Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings.
Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.
If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information.
For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Cite Document
Illinois Bankers Association et al v. Raoul, 1:24-cv-07307, No. 97 (N.D.Ill. Oct. 29, 2024)
+ More Snippets
Document
Illinois Bankers Association et al v. Raoul, 1:24-cv-07307, No. 59 (N.D.Ill. Sep. 30, 2024)
This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, September 30, 2024: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall.
Attorneys Elizabeth Rinehart, Max Bonici, and Leonard Gordon's Motions to appear pro hac vice [54], [55], and [56] are granted.
Defendant's Motion for leave to file excess pages [57] is granted.
If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information.
For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Cite Document
Illinois Bankers Association et al v. Raoul, 1:24-cv-07307, No. 59 (N.D.Ill. Sep. 30, 2024)
+ More Snippets
Document
Illinois Bankers Association et al v. Raoul, 1:24-cv-07307, No. 46 (N.D.Ill. Sep. 18, 2024)
This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, September 18, 2024: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall.
Motion for leave to file brief as Amicus Curiae [45] is granted.
It was generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and criminal dockets of this District.
If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information.
For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Cite Document
Illinois Bankers Association et al v. Raoul, 1:24-cv-07307, No. 46 (N.D.Ill. Sep. 18, 2024)
+ More Snippets
Document
Illinois Bankers Association et al v. Raoul, 1:24-cv-07307, No. 43 (N.D.Ill. Sep. 3, 2024)
Oral argument heard regarding Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction [15].
The Court set the following briefing schedule regarding Motion for Preliminary Injunction [15].
In Court Oral Argument (2 hours) is set for 10/30/2024 at 1:30 PM which will proceed in Courtroom 2541.
If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information.
For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Cite Document
Illinois Bankers Association et al v. Raoul, 1:24-cv-07307, No. 43 (N.D.Ill. Sep. 3, 2024)
+ More Snippets
Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 142 (9th Cir. Aug. 26, 2021)
Cite Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 142 (9th Cir. Aug. 26, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 129 (9th Cir. Aug. 17, 2021)
D.C. No. Southern District of California, San Diego
Case: 19-56514, 08/17/2021, ID: 12203715, DktEntry: 129, Page 6 of 6 THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Virtual en banc oral argument will take place during the week of September 20, 2021.
Within seven days from the date of this order, the parties shall forward to the Clerk of Court eighteen additional paper copies of the original briefs and ten additional paper copies of the excerpts of record.
The paper copies must be accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically.
Cite Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 129 (9th Cir. Aug. 17, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514 (9th Cir. Aug. 3, 2021)
D.C. No. Southern District of California, San Diego
MORAN FOODS, LLC, DBA Save-A-Lot;
SEAFOODS, LLC, DBA Chicken of the Sea International, DBA Thai Union Group PCL, DBA Thai Union North America, Inc.;
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.
Judges McKeown, Wardlaw, Berzon, Owens, Miller, Collins, Bress, and Forrest did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Cite Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514 (9th Cir. Aug. 3, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 128 (9th Cir. Aug. 3, 2021)
D.C. No. Southern District of California, San Diego
RUSHIN GOLD, LLC, DBA The Gold Rush; UNIFIED GROCERS, INC.; Case: 19-56514, 08/03/2021, ID: 12190392, DktEntry: 128, Page 4 of 6
Case: 19-56514, 08/03/2021, ID: 12190392, DktEntry: 128, Page 6 of 6 THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.
Judges McKeown, Wardlaw, Berzon, Owens, Miller, Collins, Bress, and Forrest did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Cite Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 128 (9th Cir. Aug. 3, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Alaska Air Group Inc et al v. Anthem Inc et al, 2:21-cv-01209, No. 435 (N.D.Ala. Apr. 30, 2024)
In considering the motions, the court noted that the relevant question under American Pipe tolling principles was “[w]hen were Defendants notified of the ASOs’ substantive claims and the number and generic identities of the ASOs?” because the statute of limitations would go back four years from this date.
But now the statute of limitations issue is intertwined with the current discovery dispute because Defendants assert the requested MDL data is irrelevant as it predates any damages period applicable to Plaintiffs’ claims in these cases.
The court notes that in the declaration filed in support of their Motion to Compel, Plaintiffs set forth what they characterize as examples of “evidence” or admissions that Defendants knew that ASOs were included in the early complaints in the MDL.
Plaintiffs point to a statement made at the hearing by Defendants’ counsel, Lauren Kennedy, which they claim stands for the proposition that Defendants “did absolutely believe ASOs might be” included in the early complaints.
The court discussed the record evidence from 2019, which was before the Subscriber Track Fourth Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint was filed, that showed Defendants were on notice of the ASO claims.
Cite Document
Alaska Air Group Inc et al v. Anthem Inc et al, 2:21-cv-01209, No. 435 (N.D.Ala. Apr. 30, 2024)
+ More Snippets
Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 127 (9th Cir. May. 24, 2021)
Case: 19-56514, 05/24/2021, ID: 12122457, DktEntry: 127, Page 1 of 2
D.C. No. Southern District of California, San Diego
Case: 19-56514, 05/24/2021, ID: 12122457, DktEntry: 127, Page 2 of 2 Before: KLEINFELD, HURWITZ, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
The amicus brief submitted on May 19, 2021, by Public Justice, P.C. is filed.
No paper copies are required at this time.
Cite Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 127 (9th Cir. May. 24, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 125 (9th Cir. May. 24, 2021)
Case: 19-56514, 05/24/2021, ID: 12122440, DktEntry: 125, Page 1 of 2
D.C. No. Southern District of California, San Diego
Case: 19-56514, 05/24/2021, ID: 12122440, DktEntry: 125, Page 2 of 2 Before: KLEINFELD, HURWITZ, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
The amicus brief submitted on May 19, 2021, by The Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws is filed.
No paper copies are required at this time.
Cite Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 125 (9th Cir. May. 24, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 124 (9th Cir. May. 24, 2021)
Case: 19-56514, 05/24/2021, ID: 12122436, DktEntry: 124, Page 1 of 2
D.C. No. Southern District of California, San Diego
Before: KLEINFELD, HURWITZ, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
The amicus brief submitted on May 19, 2021 by American Antitrust Institute is filed.
No paper copies are required at this time.
Cite Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 124 (9th Cir. May. 24, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 123 (9th Cir. May. 24, 2021)
Case: 19-56514, 05/24/2021, ID: 12122414, DktEntry: 123, Page 1 of 2
D.C. No. Southern District of California, San Diego
Before: KLEINFELD, HURWITZ, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
The amicus brief submitted on May 19, 2021 by Impact Fund, Bet Tzedek, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation, Centro Legal de la Raza, Legal Aid at Work, and Public Counsel is filed.
No paper copies are required at this time.
Cite Document
Olean Wholesale Grocery Co-op, et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC, et al, 19-56514, No. 123 (9th Cir. May. 24, 2021)
+ More Snippets