• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 54-68 of 902 results

California v. John Anthony Reyes

Docket 19HF0035, California State, Orange County, Superior Court (Aug. 15, 2018)
Case TypeCriminal and Traffic
TagsCriminal and Traffic, Criminal, Traffic
Plaintiff State of California
Defendant John Anthony Reyes
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

MJM Visions, LLC v. CSC Serviceworks, Inc.

Docket 1:18-cv-04452, New York Eastern District Court (Aug. 7, 2018)
Judge I. Leo Glasser, presiding, Magistrate Judge James Orenstein
Contract - Other
DivisionBrooklyn
FlagsACO
Demand$5,000,000
Cause28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Case Type190 Contract - Other
Tags190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other, 190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other
Plaintiff MJM Visions, LLC
Defendant CSC Serviceworks, Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

East 18th Management Corporation v. CSC Serviceworks, Inc.

Docket 1:18-cv-04068, New York Eastern District Court (July 16, 2018)
Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis, presiding, Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy
Contract - Other
DivisionBrooklyn
FlagsACO
Cause28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Case Type190 Contract - Other
Tags190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other, 190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other
East 18th Management Corporation
CSC Serviceworks, Inc.
Plaintiff East 18th Management Corporation
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

California v. John Anthony Reyes

Docket 18HM12908, California State, Orange County, Superior Court (July 10, 2018)
Case TypeCriminal and Traffic
TagsCriminal and Traffic, Criminal, Traffic
Plaintiff State of California
Defendant John Anthony Reyes
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

RBB2, LLC v. CSC Serviceworks, Inc.

Docket 1:18-cv-00915, California Eastern District Court (July 6, 2018)
Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill, presiding, Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston
Contract - Other
DivisionFresno
FlagsCIVIL, CLOSED
Demand$5,000,000
Cause28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Case Type190 Contract - Other
Tags190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other, 190 Contract, Contract, Civil, Other
Plaintiff RBB2, LLC
Defendant CSC Serviceworks, Inc.
Amicus Summit Gardens Associates
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

California v. John Anthony Reyes

Docket 18HM14564, California State, Orange County, Superior Court (June 21, 2018)
Case TypeCriminal and Traffic
TagsCriminal and Traffic, Criminal, Traffic
Plaintiff State of California
Defendant John Anthony Reyes
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

California v. Sal Amezcua

Docket 18WM08819, California State, Orange County, Superior Court (June 11, 2018)
Case TypeCriminal and Traffic
TagsCriminal and Traffic, Criminal, Traffic
Plaintiff State of California
Defendant Sal Amezcua
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

California v. John Anthony Reyes

Docket 18HM12665, California State, Orange County, Superior Court (June 1, 2018)
Case TypeCriminal and Traffic
TagsCriminal and Traffic, Criminal, Traffic
Plaintiff State of California
Defendant John Anthony Reyes
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Dr. Kerry Park, et al v. American Express Bank, FSB et al

Docket 2:17-cv-04522, California Central District Court (June 19, 2017)
Judge George H. Wu, presiding, Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson
Fraud
DivisionLos Angeles (Western Division)
FlagsACCO, (KSx), CLOSED, DISCOVERY, MANADR, REMANDED
Cause28:1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Case Type370 Fraud
Tags370 Fraud, 370 Fraud
DR. Kerry Park
American Express Bank, FSB
Plaintiff Dr. Kerry Park
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 506 ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' ...

Document Sorto-Vasquez Kidd et al v. Wolf et al, 2:20-cv-03512, No. 506 (C.D.Cal. May. 15, 2024)
Motion for Summary JudgmentGranted
Angeles (“CHIRLA”) seek class-wide declaratory relief that various actions, policies, and practices by which ICE officers allegedly enter residences or curtilage to arrest occupants violate the Fourth Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”).
The BIETP Lesson Plan, which includes a Performance Objective titled “Explain how to lawfully approach a dwelling for a knock and talk,” lays out factors informing prospective ICE officers of best practices when using walkways/paths to access the property’s door.
Similar to the Fourth Amendment claims discussed above, Plaintiffs allege that ICE field officers violate this regulation when they enter onto the curtilage of a residence without a judicial warrant “for the purpose of questioning the occupants.” (PMSJ 12–13 (quoting 8 C.F.R. § 287.8(f)(2)).)
Furthermore, the Ninth Circuit has found that § 287.812 “‘was intended to reflect constitutional restrictions on the ability of immigration officials to interrogate and detain persons in this country’” and thus “provid[es] at least as much protection as the Fourth Amendment.” Perez Cruz v. Barr, 926 F.3d 1128, 1137 (9th Cir. 2019) (quoting Sanchez v. Sessions, 904 F.3d 643,
This Order specifically applies to the portions of Defendants’ policies and trainings pertaining to the entry onto curtilage for the purpose of carrying out an arrest, without judicial warrant or express consent, through the use of “knock and talks.” The Court will issue a final judgment to this effect at the resolution of this case.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 67 ORDER VACATING PENDING DATES AND DEADLINES FOLLOWING NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Magistrate Judge ...

Document Fernando Victorica Castillo et al v. United States of America, 2:22-cv-04390, No. 67 (C.D.Cal. May. 3, 2024)
All scheduled dates and deadlines are hereby VACATED.
Theparties shall file a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice as soon as Dated: May3, 2024 TSin L-ae
Chief United States Magistrate Judge CowAanNDnfFWYNY —a) Presented by:
Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division
Assistant United States attorney.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 62 ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO

Document Fernando Victorica Castillo et al v. United States of America, 2:22-cv-04390, No. 62 (C.D.Cal. Apr. 24, 2024)
Motion in Limine to Exclude TestimonyPartial
Having considered the Motion, evidence in support thereof, opposition papers, and reply papers as well as evidence and argument in support thereof, the Court finds that the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
Defendant objects that testimony by Dr. Tseng, Plaintiffs’ retained expert, “will not be ‘the product of reliable principles and methods.’” (Defendant’s MIL No. 1 at 1 (citing Fed. R. Evid.
The Court noted, however, that Defendant did not bring a Daubert motion before the close of expert discovery to properly challenge the reliability of Dr. Tseng’s opinions.
Dr. Tseng is himself a practicing physician and will not be testifying based on any novel or untested scientific methodologies or theories.
Defendant’s objections do not undermine the admissibility of Dr. Tseng’s opinions, but instead offer a basis to challenge the credibility and weight of Plaintiff’s sole retained 1 Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
cite Cite Document
Analyze

California v. Chase Anthony Mendoza

Docket 17HF0088, California State, Orange County, Superior Court (Jan. 16, 2017)
Case TypeCriminal and Traffic
TagsCriminal and Traffic, Criminal, Traffic
Plaintiff State of California
Defendant Chase Anthony Mendoza
Co-Defendant Schachtschneider, Ben
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

United States of America v. United Health Group, Inc. et al

Docket 2:16-cv-08697, California Central District Court (Nov. 22, 2016)
Judge Fernando M. Olguin, presiding, Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo
Statutory Actions - Other

cite Cite Docket
Analyze

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OF

Document JOHN DOE VS. BIJOU-CENTURY, LLC (DBA NEW CENTURY THEATRE) ET AL, CGC-19-574590, No. 08830540 (California State, San Francisco County, Superior Court Dec. 4, 2023)
THEATRE) et al Case Ordered Off Calendar
Case Ordered Off Calendar Form 000001
I, the undersigned, certify that I am an employee of the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco and not a party to the above-entitled cause and that on DEC-04-2023 I served the attached Case Ordered Off Calendar by placing a copy thereof in an envelope addressed to all parties to this action as listed below.
I then placed the envelope in the outgoing mail at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102, on the date indicated above for collection, sealing of the envelope, attachment of required prepaid postage, and mailing on that date, following standard court practice.
Dated : DEC-04-2023 By: GINA GONZALES
cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>