• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 24-38 of 5,838 results

Winfield United v. Stoller Enterprises, Inc. et al

Docket 0:22-mc-00021, Minnesota District Court (Mar. 25, 2022)
Chief Judge John R. Tunheim, presiding, Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer
Statutory Actions - Other
DivisionDMN
FlagsCLOSED
CauseCivil Miscellaneous Case
Case Type890 Statutory Actions - Other
Tags890 Statutory Actions, Other, 890 Statutory Actions, Other
Winfield United
Stoller Enterprises, Inc.
Respondent Stoller Enterprises, Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Olson v. PowerBlock, Inc. et al

Docket 0:21-cv-02713, Minnesota District Court (Dec. 21, 2021)
Judge Eric C. Tostrud, presiding, Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson
Anti-Trust
DivisionDMN
FlagsCLOSED, CV
Cause15:2 Antitrust Litigation
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Plaintiff Gregory S. Olson
Defendant PowerBlock, Inc.
Defendant PowerBlock Holdings, Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

PolyTek Surface Coatings, LLC v. Ideal Concrete Coatings, Co.

Docket 0:21-cv-02692, Minnesota District Court (Dec. 17, 2021)
Judge David S. Doty, presiding, Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty
Trademark
DivisionDMN
FlagsCV
Demand$75,000
Cause15:1114 Trademark Infringement
Case Type840 Trademark
Tags840 Trademark, 840 Trademark
Plaintiff PolyTek Surface Coatings, LLC
Defendant Ideal Concrete Coatings, Co.
Plaintiff Polytek Surface Coatings, LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

PowerBlock, Inc., PowerBlock Holdings, Inc. vs Gregory S. Olson, Heavy Metal Bar...

Docket 74-CV-21-1682, Minnesota State, Steele County, District Court
Duncan Karen R, presiding.
Case TypeContract
TagsContract, Civil
Plaintiff PowerBlock Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff PowerBlock, Inc.
Defendant Heavy Metal Barbell, LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Schwendimann v. Arkwright Advanced Coating

Docket 18-2416, U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit (Sept. 26, 2018)
Patent
07/05/2019
07/05/2019 50 Notice from Appellant Arkwright Advanced Coating, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. None. Service: 07/05/2019 by email. [619305] [18-2416] [Michael H...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Geographic Location Innovations, LLC v. Evereve Incorporated

Docket 0:21-cv-01048, Minnesota District Court (Apr. 23, 2021)
Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright, presiding, Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer
Patent
DivisionDMN
FlagsCLOSED, CV, PATENT
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Geographic Location Innovations LLC
Evereve Incorporated
Plaintiff Geographic Location Innovations, LLC
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Wilson v. Martin

Docket 18-1980, U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit (May 16, 2018)
Appellant JOHN R. WILSON
Appellee GREGORY ROGER MARTIN
Appellee ALLISON JEAN TANNER
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

ISCI HOLDINGS INC. v. ORBIT BIOMEDICAL, INC. et al

Docket 2:20-cv-02789, Pennsylvania Eastern District Court (June 11, 2020)
CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, presiding
Property Damage - Other
DivisionPhiladelphia
FlagsSTAYED, SPECIAL
Cause18:1836(a) Injunction Against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Case Type380 Property Damage - Other
Tags380 Property Damage, Other, 380 Property Damage, Other
Plaintiff ISCI HOLDINGS INC.
Defendant ORBIT BIOMEDICAL, INC.
Defendant GYROSCOPE THERAPEUTICS LIMITED
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Corning Incorporated v. Wilson Wolf Manufacturing Corporation et al

Docket 0:20-cv-00700, Minnesota District Court (Mar. 9, 2020)
Judge Donovan W. Frank, presiding, Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung
Patent
DivisionDMN
FlagsCLOSED, CV, MARKMAN, PATENT, PROTO, RELTD
Cause35:145 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Corning Incorporated
Defendant Wilson Wolf Manufacturing Corporation
Defendant John R. Wilson
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Medtronic, Inc., a Minnesota corporation vs Scott Hayden, an individual, Ascend M...

Docket 02-CV-20-520, Minnesota State, Anoka County, District Court (Jan. 29, 2020)
Street, Dyanna L., Dehen, John P., presiding
Case TypeContract
TagsContract, Civil
Plaintiff Medtronic, Inc.
Defendant Ascend Medical Technologies LLC
Defendant Scott Hayden
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Wilson Wolf Manufacturing Corporation v. Brammer Bio, LLC

Docket 1:19-cv-02315, Delaware District Court (Dec. 20, 2019)
Judge Richard G. Andrews, presiding
Patent
DivisionWilmington
FlagsCLOSED, PATENT
Cause35:1 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Wilson Wolf Manufacturing Corporation
Defendant Brammer Bio, LLC
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Wilson Wolf Manufacturing Corporation v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Docket 1:19-cv-02316, Delaware District Court (Dec. 20, 2019)
Judge Richard G. Andrews, presiding
Patent
DivisionWilmington
FlagsCLOSED, PATENT
Cause35:1 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff Wilson Wolf Manufacturing Corporation
Defendant Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Leseman, LLC v. Stratasys, Inc.

Docket 17-1453, U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit (Jan. 6, 2017)
Patent
01/24/2017
... question 2] and therefore cannot be accepted for filing at this time. Question two may not be left blank; if applicable, "none" may be used. You are being afforded the opportunity to...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Kahr v. Cole

Docket 17-1391, U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit (Dec. 21, 2016)
Patent
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Plaintiff - Appellant MICHAEL M. KAHR
Defendant - Appellee MICHAEL E. COLE
Defendant - Appellee IRON WORKS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LLC
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 40 ORDER filed

Document Schwendimann v. Stahls' Inc., 22-1652, No. 40 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2023)
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Before PROST, CLEVENGER, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges.
Jodi A. Schwendimann owns U.S. Patent Nos. RE41,623 (the “’623 patent”), 7,754,042 (the “’042 patent”), 7,766,475 (the “’475 patent”), and 7,749,581 (the “’581 pa- tent”) (collectively, the “Appealed Patents”).
Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed as moot in light of our affirmance in Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc., No. 2022-1333, slip op.
22, ––– F.4th –––, ––– (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2023), which renders unpatentable all of the claims at issue in these appeals.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... >>