• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 39-53 of 33,101 results

No. 246 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and MICHAEL J. MCSHANE): The panel has unanimously ...

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., 21-16506, No. 246 (9th Cir. Jun. 30, 2023)
D.C. No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Northern District of California, Oakland
Judge M. Smith has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc, and Judges
* The Honorable Michael J. McShane, United States District Judge for
the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.
The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote.
cite Cite Document

In re California Bail Bond Antitrust Litigation

Docket 4:19-cv-00717, California Northern District Court (Feb. 8, 2019)
Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu, presiding, Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu
Statutory Actions - Other
02/13/2025
... as well as non-participating counsel in attendance were invited to raise an objection or request a continuance of the hearing. None did so, and all participating counsel specifically asked that the...
cite Cite Docket

No. 222 CORRECTED OPINION RE: [215] (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and MICHAEL J. MCSHANE)

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., 21-16506, No. 222 (9th Cir. May. 3, 2023)
None of the authorities Apple cites comes anywhere close to supporting its radical argument that, where parties offer dueling market definitions, the case immediately ends if the district court finds the record supports the defendant’s ...
Nonetheless, we are bound by County of Tuolumne and mindful of Alston’s warning that the first three steps of the Rule of Reason are not a “rote checklist.” Therefore, where a plaintiff’s case comes up short at step three, the district court ...
Nonetheless, we join the D.C. Circuit in holding that per se condemnation is inappropriate for ties “involv[ing] software that serves as a platform for third-party applications.” Microsoft, 253 F.3d at 89.
Particularly, “[i]n none of these cases was the tied good . . . technologically integrated with the tying good.” Microsoft, 253 F.3d at 90. Moreover, none of the ties presented any purported procompetitive benefits that could not be achieved ...
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets

No. 219 CORRECTED OPINION RE: [215] (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and MICHAEL J. MCSHANE)

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., 21-16506, No. 219 (9th Cir. Apr. 27, 2023)
None of the authorities Apple cites comes anywhere close to supporting its radical argument that, where parties offer dueling market definitions, the case immediately ends if the district court finds the record supports the defendant’s ...
Nonetheless, we are bound by County of Tuolumne and mindful of Alston’s warning that the first three steps of the Rule of Reason are not a “rote checklist.” Therefore, where a plaintiff’s case comes up short at step three, the district court ...
Nonetheless, we join the D.C. Circuit in holding that per se condemnation is inappropriate for ties “involv[ing] software that serves as a platform for third-party applications.” Microsoft, 253 F.3d at 89.
Particularly, “[i]n none of these cases was the tied good . . . technologically integrated with the tying good.” Microsoft, 253 F.3d at 90. Moreover, none of the ties presented any purported procompetitive benefits that could not be achieved ...
cite Cite Document
+ More Snippets

No. 218

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., 21-16506, No. 218 (9th Cir. Apr. 25, 2023)

cite Cite Document

No. 203

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., 21-16695, No. 203 (9th Cir. Apr. 25, 2023)

cite Cite Document

No. 215

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., 21-16506, No. 215 (9th Cir. Apr. 24, 2023)

cite Cite Document

No. 200

Document Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., 21-16695, No. 200 (9th Cir. Apr. 24, 2023)

cite Cite Document

In re Nissan North America, Inc. Litigation

Docket 4:18-cv-07292, California Northern District Court (Nov. 30, 2018)
Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr, presiding.
Fraud

cite Cite Docket

JENNIFER MASIELLO vs. NUTRIBULLET, LLC, et al

Docket 18-CIV-03072, California State, San Mateo County, Superior Court (June 18, 2018)
John L. Grandsaert, presiding.

cite Cite Docket

FREEDOM EQUITY GROUP, LLC vs Kenneth Sisco

Docket 18CV326657, California State, Santa Clara County, Superior Court (April 17, 2018)

cite Cite Docket

No. 1075

Document In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation, 3:21-md-02981, No. 1075 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 28, 2025)

cite Cite Document

No. 534

Document In re California Bail Bond Antitrust Litigation, 4:19-cv-00717, No. 534 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 13, 2025)

cite Cite Document

No. 533

Document In re California Bail Bond Antitrust Litigation, 4:19-cv-00717, No. 533 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 11, 2025)

cite Cite Document

No. 1065

Document In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation, 3:21-md-02981, No. 1065 (N.D.Cal. Jan. 23, 2025)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... >>