District This action came on for jury trial, the Honorable Judge, presiding, and the issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its verdict, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff(s): recover of the defendant(s): the sum of provided by the law, and its costs of action, taxed in the sum of , with interest thereon at the legal rate as .

Clerk, U. S. District Court By Deputy Clerk Dated: At: cc: Counsel of record

The documents and writings so designated, and all information derived therefrom (hereinafter, collectively, “Confidential Information”), shall be treated in accordance with the terms of this stipulation/protective order.

All persons subject to the protective order will sign a letter addressed to the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office confirming such destruction has occurred.

Counsel for the parties further agree that, during any portion of the trial of this action which could entail the discussion or disclosure of Confidential Information, that CITY OF LOS ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE (Craig Miller), will have an opportunity to request that access to the courtroom be limited to parties, their counsel and other designated representative, experts or consultants who agreed to be bound by this stipulation/protective order, and court personnel.

Nothing herein shall prejudice any party's rights to object to the introduction of any Confidential Information into evidence, on grounds including but not limited to relevance and privilege.

L. The court shall maintain continuing jurisdiction over this matter to the extent necessary to enforce the terms and/or address alleged breaches of this protective order.

On March 02, 2006, the Court granted (and the Ninth Circuit affirmed on May 2, 2008) summary judgment in favor of Defendant County of Orange on Plaintiff’s Second Cause of Action under 42 U.S.C § 1983 for violation of the First Amendment.

On April 21, 2009, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed Defendants Deputies Drootin, Feely and Streeter, and Sergeant Acuna.

The remainder of this action came on regularly for trial on April 21, 2009, in Courtroom 6 of the United States District Court, the Honorable Stephen V. Wilson presiding; Plaintiff Donald Fuller appeared by Attorneys Donald W. Cook and Olu K. Orange, and Defendant County of Orange appeared by Attorney Dennis Gonzales.

The jury deliberated and thereafter returned to Court with its verdict in favor of Defendant County of Orange on all claims.

Defendant County of Orange is entitled to costs and disbursements in the amount of $ ______________.