• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 54-68 of 441 results

No. 170 REPLY, filed by Defendant Association of Flight Attendants-CWA AFL-CIO, TO RESPONSE to 131 ...

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines Inc et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 170 (W.D.Wash. Feb. 20, 2024)
Motion to Exclude Testimony
None of Burt’s purported testimony meets the requisite standards of Rule 702 and must be excluded.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 171 REPLY, filed by Defendant Association of Flight Attendants-CWA AFL-CIO, TO RESPONSE to 132 ...

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines Inc et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 171 (W.D.Wash. Feb. 20, 2024)
Motion to Exclude Testimony
2 See e.g., https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/07/07/attitudes-about-transgender-issues-vary-widely- among-christians-religious-nones-in-u-s/ (32% of non-religiously affiliated Americans believe gender is determined by ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 155 REPLY, filed by Plaintiffs Marli Brown, Lacey Smith, TO RESPONSE to 128 MOTION to Exclude Langford ...

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines Inc et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 155 (W.D.Wash. Feb. 12, 2024)
Motion to Exclude Report
Indeed, six pages of its Response is a laundry list of misconstrued facts, all reworked in AFA’s attempt to clear its name from its blatant religious discrimination and hostility toward Plaintiffs Brown and Smith.
Marli’s union representative Terry Taylor immediately reacted to Marli’s post with, “Can we PLEASE get someone to shut down comments, or put Marli and Lacey in a burlap bag and drop them in a well.” ER0968.
Union President Jeff Peterson reported both Plaintiffs’ comments to Alaska Airlines (“the Company” or “the Airline”) for discipline through a series of calls, texts, and emails with Company officials.
The Court further defined relevance as “being ‘sufficiently tied to the facts of the case that it will aid the jury in resolving a factual dispute.’” Daubert, 509 U.S. at 591 (quoting United States v. Downing, 753 F.2d 1224, 1242 (3d Cir. 1985)).
Lankford is clearly out of his depth opining on these legal rules and concepts; he ignores binding, unanimous Supreme Court precedent in Groff v. DeJoy holding the contrary.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 152

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines Inc et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 152 (W.D.Wash. Feb. 5, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 43

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines Inc et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 43 (W.D.Wash. Aug. 9, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 144

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines Inc et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 144 (W.D.Wash. Jan. 16, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 146

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines Inc et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 146 (W.D.Wash. Jan. 16, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 126

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines Inc et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 126 (W.D.Wash. Jan. 8, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 128

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines Inc et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 128 (W.D.Wash. Jan. 8, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 42

Document Krueger v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., 2:22-cv-01777, No. 42 (W.D.Wash. Dec. 28, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 124

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines Inc et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 124 (W.D.Wash. Dec. 19, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 30

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines, Inc. et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 30 (W.D.Wash. Jun. 21, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 28

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines, Inc. et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 28 (W.D.Wash. Jun. 15, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 24

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines, Inc. et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 24 (W.D.Wash. Jun. 7, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 203

Document Brown et al v. Alaska Airlines Inc et al, 2:22-cv-00668, No. 203 (W.D.Wash. Jul. 18, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>