• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 39-53 of 3,916 results

No. 134 ORDER: Petitioners’ “Opposed Time-Sensitive Motion for Stay and Injunctive Relief” is DENIED ...

Document American Securities Association, et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 23-13396, No. 134 (11th Cir. Nov. 27, 2024)
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
USCA11 Case: 23-13396 Document: 134 Date Filed: 11/27/2024 Page: 2 of 2 Order of the Court Intervenors.
Petition for Review of a Decision of the Securities and Exchange Commission Agency No. 34-98290
The motion of amici curiae Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and Virtu Financial, Inc. to file an amicus brief in support of Petitioners’ motion for a stay and injunctive relief is
Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
cite Cite Document

NATURAL SODA LLC AND ENIRGI GROUP CORPORATION v. BUNNETT & CO., IN...

Docket 20-0578, Texas State, Supreme Court (July 28, 2020)
Case TypePetition for Review originally filed as 53.7(f)
TagsPetition For, Review Originally Filed
Respondent Energy Feeds International, LLC
Respondent William E. Bunnett
Respondent Bunnett & Co., Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 115 ORDER: The motion for an extension of time to and including September 30, 2024, to file Respondent ...

Document American Securities Association, et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 23-13396, No. 115 (11th Cir. Sep. 19, 2024)
Motion to Extend TimeGranted
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
USCA11 Case: 23-13396 Document: 115 Date Filed: 09/19/2024 Page: 2 of 2 Order of the Court Intervenors.
Petition for Review of a Decision of the Securities and Exchange Commission Agency No. 34-98290
The motion for an extension of time to and including Sep- tember 30, 2024, to file Respondent and Intervenors’ response to Petitioners’ motion for stay and injunctive relief is GRANTED.
cite Cite Document

No. 107 ORDER: The motion to withdraw attorney Timothy D. Katsiff as counsel is GRANTED

Document American Securities Association, et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 23-13396, No. 107 (11th Cir. Jun. 18, 2024)
Motion to Withdraw as CounselGranted
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
USCA11 Case: 23-13396 Document: 107 Date Filed: 06/18/2024 Page: 2 of 2 Order of the Court Intervenors.
Petition for Review of a Decision of the Securities and Exchange Commission Agency No. 34-98290
The motion to withdraw attorney Timothy D. Katsiff as counsel is GRANTED.
The clerk is DIRECTED to terminate attorney Timothy D. Katsiff from appeal number 23-13396.
cite Cite Document

No. 48 ORDER: The “Motion for Leave to Intervene by the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, Nasdaq BX, Inc., ...

Document American Securities Association, et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 23-13396, No. 48 (11th Cir. Jan. 17, 2024)
Motion to InterveneGranted
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 David J. Smith Clerk of Court
January 17, 2024 For rules and forms visit www.ca11.uscourts.gov
Appeal Number: 23-13396-B Case Style: American Securities Association, et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Agency Docket Number: 34-98290 The enclosed order has been ENTERED.
Although not required, non-incarcerated pro se parties are permitted to use the ECF system by registering for an account at www.pacer.gov.
Information and training materials related to electronic filing are available on the Court's website.
cite Cite Document

No. 153 MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Jacob Roth for Petitioners American Securities ...

Document American Securities Association, et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 23-13396, No. 153 (11th Cir. Feb. 20, 2025)
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
Hopen, David A., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, counsel for Amici Curiae Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association et al. 58.
Reisner, Lorin L., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, counsel for Amici Curiae Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association et al. 125.
Representatives Mark Alford, Don Bacon, Michael Collins, Scott Fitzgerald, French Hill, Barry Loudermilk, Alex X. Mooney, Ralph Norman, John Rose, Keith Self, Randy Weber, and Steve Womack, Amici Curiae.
Schwartz, Yishai, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, counsel for Amici Curiae Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association et al.
Shanmugam, Kannon K., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, counsel for Amici Curiae, Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association et al. 134.
cite Cite Document

No. 148 MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Joshua Timothy Hoyt for Petitioners American ...

Document American Securities Association, et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 23-13396, No. 148 (11th Cir. Jan. 21, 2025)
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
Hopen, David A., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, counsel for Amici Curiae Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association et al. 58.
Lipshutz, Brian M., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, counsel for Amici Curiae Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association et al. 80.
Reisner, Lorin L., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, counsel for Amici Curiae Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association et al. 125.
Representatives Mark Alford, Don Bacon, Michael Collins, Scott Fitzgerald, French Hill, Barry Loudermilk, Alex X. Mooney, Ralph Norman, John Rose, Keith Self, Randy Weber, and Steve Womack, Amici Curiae.
Schwartz, Yishai, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, counsel for Amici Curiae Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association et al.
cite Cite Document

No. 145 MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney Nicholas J. Bronni for Amici Curiae State of ...

Document American Securities Association, et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 23-13396, No. 145 (11th Cir. Jan. 3, 2025)
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., Plan Participant of Intervenor Consolidated Audit Trail, LLC; 54.
Michael, Christopher G., Counsel of Record for Amici Curiae Senator Tom Cotton and 21 Other Members of Congress; 108.
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Counsel for Amici Curiae Senator Tom Cotton and 21 Other Members of Congress; 141.
Skorup, Brent, Counsel of Record for Amici Curiae Cato Institute and Investor Choice Advocates Network; 155.
Nicholas J. Bronni, counsel for Amici Curiae, State of Arkansas et al., respectfully moves to withdraw as an attorney of record in this matter.
cite Cite Document

No. 124 REPLY to RESPONSE to [112] filed by Petitioners American Securities Association and Citadel ...

Document American Securities Association, et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 23-13396, No. 124 (11th Cir. Oct. 7, 2024)
Representatives Mark Alford, Don Bacon, Michael Collins, Scott Fitzgerald, French Hill, Barry Loudermilk, Alex X. Mooney, Ralph Norman, John Rose, Keith Self, Randy Weber, and Steve Womack, Amici Curiae.
Yet with the finish line in sight, the SROs, backed by a pliant SEC, have suddenly decided to irrevocably implement the challenged Order before this Court can determine its lawfulness.
While the SROs insist the Dodd-Frank Act stripped this Court of its inherent authority to issue such relief, nothing in that law, which concerns the SEC’s review of fee filings not challenged here, eliminates this Court’s power to preserve the status quo while it considers an Order undeniably within its purview.
In any event, petitioners need only show the lack of a stay would put them “at risk of irreparable harm by depriving them of [money] with no guarantee of eventual recovery.” Alabama Ass’n of Realtors v. HHS, 594 U.S. 758, 765 (2021) (emphases added); see Askins & Miller, 924 F.3d at 1359 (“the likelihood that a defendant will never pay” suffices).
The SROs therefore do not, and cannot, contend § 78s(b)(3)(C) expressly divested this Court of its inherent equitable authority, long recognized in the All Writs Act, to briefly stop the collection of CAT fees.
cite Cite Document

No. 124 REPLY to RESPONSE to [112] filed by Petitioners American Securities Association and Citadel ...

Document American Securities Association, et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 23-13396, No. 124 (11th Cir. Oct. 7, 2024)
Representatives Mark Alford, Don Bacon, Michael Collins, Scott Fitzgerald, French Hill, Barry Loudermilk, Alex X. Mooney, Ralph Norman, John Rose, Keith Self, Randy Weber, and Steve Womack, Amici Curiae.
Yet with the finish line in sight, the SROs, backed by a pliant SEC, have suddenly decided to irrevocably implement the challenged Order before this Court can determine its lawfulness.
While the SROs insist the Dodd-Frank Act stripped this Court of its inherent authority to issue such relief, nothing in that law, which concerns the SEC’s review of fee filings not challenged here, eliminates this Court’s power to preserve the status quo while it considers an Order undeniably within its purview.
In any event, petitioners need only show the lack of a stay would put them “at risk of irreparable harm by depriving them of [money] with no guarantee of eventual recovery.” Alabama Ass’n of Realtors v. HHS, 594 U.S. 758, 765 (2021) (emphases added); see Askins & Miller, 924 F.3d at 1359 (“the likelihood that a defendant will never pay” suffices).
The SROs therefore do not, and cannot, contend § 78s(b)(3)(C) expressly divested this Court of its inherent equitable authority, long recognized in the All Writs Act, to briefly stop the collection of CAT fees.
cite Cite Document

No. 116 MOTION For Leave to File Brief in Support of Petitioners' Opposed Time-Sensitive Motion for ...

Document American Securities Association, et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 23-13396, No. 116 (11th Cir. Sep. 20, 2024)
Motion to File Brief
USCA11 Case: 23-13396 Document: 116-1 Date Filed: 09/20/2024 Page: 4 of 13 No. 23-13396, American Securities Association v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission • • • • • • • • • • • Consolidated Audit Trail, LLC, Intervenor Consovoy McCarthy, PLLC, Counsel for Petitioner American Securi- ties Association Francisco, Noel John, Counsel for Petitioner Citadel Securities LLC Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., Member and Partici- pant of Intervenor Consolidated Audit Trail, LLC Flowers, Benjamin M., Counsel for Amici Curiae James Overdahl and S.P.
USCA11 Case: 23-13396 Document: 116-1 Date Filed: 09/20/2024 Page: 9 of 13 No. 23-13396, American Securities Association v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission • • • • • The Vanguard Group, Inc., Owner of More than 10% of Common Stock of Cboe Global Markets, Inc. as of June 30, 2023 Thoma Bravo UGP, LLC, Owner of More than 10% of Shares of Nasdaq, Inc. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Respondent Unikowsky, Adam Granich, Counsel for Intervenor Consolidated Audit Trail, LLC Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT), Amicus Curiae Amici curiae Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association has no parent corporation, and no publicly held company owns 10% or more of its stock.
On behalf of industry members and their one million employees, SIFMA advocates on legislation, regulation, and business policy affecting re- tail and institutional investors, equity and fixed-income markets, and related products and services.
Respondent Securities and Exchange Commis- sion and intervenor Consolidated Audit Trail, LLC, take no position on the motion.
I, Kannon K. Shanmugam, a member of the Bar of this Court and coun- sel for amici curiae Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and Virtu Financial, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27(d)(1)(E) and (d)(2) and Local Rule 27(a)(1), that the attached Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae Securities Industry and Finan- cial Markets Association and Virtu Financial, Inc., in Support of Petitioners’ Opposed Time-Sensitive Motion for Stay and Injunctive Relief is proportion- ately spaced, has a typeface of 14 points or more, and contains 522 words.
cite Cite Document

Travelpass Group LLC et al v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation et al

Docket 5:18-cv-00153, Texas Eastern District Court (Dec. 6, 2018)
District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III, presiding, Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven
Anti-Trust
DivisionTexarkana
FlagsCASREF, CLOSED, JURY, PROTECTIVE-ORDER, RWS3
Cause15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Plaintiff Travelpass Group LLC
Plaintiff Partner Fusion Inc
Plaintiff Reservation Counter LLC
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 01208725018 JOINT PETITIONER REPLY BRIEF [2108347] filed by Cboe Global Markets, Inc., Cboe BZX Exchange, ...

Document Cboe Global Markets, Inc., et al v. SEC, 24-1350, No. 01208725018 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 28, 2025)
Id. It was incumbent upon the Commission to address those differences head on and explain why alternative trading systems nonetheless are an apt comparator.
cite Cite Document

No. 01208727535 RESPONDENT FINAL BRIEF [2109644] filed by SEC [Service Date: 04/07/2025 ] Length of Brief: ...

Document Cboe Global Markets, Inc., et al v. SEC, 24-1350, No. 01208727535 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 7, 2025)
Were the Court nonetheless to vacate the Access-Fee-Cap Amendment, the Commission agrees with petitioners (Br. 60) that the Tick- Size Amendment should also be vacated because, as the Rules’ severability provision indicates, it ...
cite Cite Document

No. 01208727475 JOINT PETITIONER FINAL BRIEF [2109611] filed by Nasdaq, Inc., The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, ...

Document Cboe Global Markets, Inc., et al v. SEC, 24-1350, No. 01208727475 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 7, 2025)
52 USCA Case #24-1350 Document #2109611 Filed: 04/07/2025 Page 65 of 72 It cited to a handful of scattered pages from comment letters, but none of those citations speaks to exchanges’ ability to innovate.
In sum, none of the Commission’s explanations for setting the new fee cap at 10 mils withstands arbitrary-and-capricious review.
cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... >>