Search court records - party Michael Farris, page 2

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED (U.S. Jun. 26, 2024)

Because no plaintiff has carried that burden, none has standing to seek a preliminary injunction.

The District Court made none.

Thus, none of these examples jus- tifies the conduct at issue here.

Nonetheless, Face- book figured that its “current course” of “in effect explaining ourselves more fully, but not shifting on where we draw the lines,” is “a recipe for protracted and increasing acrimony with the [White House].” Id., at 573.

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Find cases with Party
- Missouri
- Vivek H. Murthy
Find cases with Firm

+ More Snippets

Gary B., et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al

Docket 18-1855, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (July 30, 2018)

Civil Rights - Other (Appeals)

Case Type	3440 Civil Rights - Other
Tags	3440 Civil Rights, Other, 3440 Civil Rights, Other
Plaintiff - Appellant	GARY B.
Plaintiff - Appellant	JESSIE K., a minor, by Yvette K., guardian ad litem
Plaintiff - Appellant	CHRISTOPHER R., a minor by Escarle R., guardian ad litem
...

Cite Docket

Analyze

Motion of Kennedy Plaintiffs for leave

Document Vivek H. Murthy, Surgeon General, et al., Petitioners v. Missouri, et al., 23-411, Motion of Kennedy Plaintiffs for leave (U.S. Dec. 11, 2023)

“coordinated campaign” by high-level federal officials to suppress the expression of disfavored views on social media platforms that now serve as the primary source of news about important public issues for many Americans.

But the denial of intervention is likely to prevent Mr. Kennedy from vindicating the rights he claims until the spring of 2024 and perhaps as late as June of that year.

In suc- cessfully arguing that we should stay the preliminary in- junction entered below, the Government contended strenu- ously that respondents lack standing.

In addition, allowing Mr. Kennedy to intervene would en- sure that we can reach the First Amendment issues, not- withstanding the Government’s contention that respond- ents lack standing.

Indeed, because Mr. Kennedy has been mentioned explicitly in communications between the Gov- ernment and social media platforms, he has a strong claim to standing, and the Government has not argued otherwise.

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Find cases with Party
- Missouri
- Vivek H. Murthy
Find cases with Firm

IN RE C.J.C.

Docket 19-0694, Texas State, Supreme Court (Aug. 12, 2019)

Case Type	Mandamus/Cause
Amicus Curiae	Texas Home School Coalition
Amicus Curiae	Alliance Defending Freedom
Amicus Curiae	State of Texas
...

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case
Find cases with Party

Uwe Andreas Josef Romeike, et al., Petitioners v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney Gene...

Docket 13-471, Supreme Court of the United States (Oct. 16, 2013)

Other	Alliance Defending Freedom, and (SCHUZH)
Petitioner	Uwe Andreas Josef Romeike, et al.
Respondent	Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General

Cite Docket

Analyze

Carol Anne Bond, Applicant v. United States

Docket 13A237, Supreme Court of the United States (Aug. 29, 2013)

Petitioner	Carol Anne Bond
Respondent	United States
Other	American Center for Law and Justice
...

Cite Docket

Analyze

Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Applicants v. Kristin M. Perry, et al.

Docket 13A18, Supreme Court of the United States (June 29, 2013)

Petitioner	Dennis Hollingsworth, et al.
Respondent	City and County of San Francisco
Respondent	Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo
...