• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
11 results

VideoLabs, Inc. et al v. Roku, Inc.

Docket 1:23-cv-01136, Delaware District Court (Oct. 11, 2023)
Judge Joel H Slomsky, presiding
Patent
DivisionWilmington
FlagsSTAYED, CLOSED, PATENT
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Patent
7233790; 7440559; 7769238; 7970059; 8291236; 8605794; 8667304
7233790
7440559
77692387970059829123686057948667304
Plaintiff VideoLabs, Inc.
Plaintiff VL Collective IP LLC
Defendant Roku, Inc.
...
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

No. 41 ORDER STAYING CASE: Defendant's Motion to Stay (Doc No. 36 ) is GRANTED

Document VideoLabs, Inc. et al v. Roku, Inc., 1:23-cv-01136, No. 41 (D.Del. Jul. 26, 2024)
Motion to StayGranted
VIDEOLABS, INC. and VL COLLECTIVE
AND NOW, this 26th day of July 2024, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 36) and the statements of the parties made at the July 25, 2024 telephone conference, it is ORDERED that: 1.
Defendant’s Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 36) is GRANTED.
All proceedings in this case are stayed until January 12, 2025.
The parties shall provide a joint status report to the Court within seven (7) business days of when the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) issues final written decisions in the following inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings: IPR2023-00628,
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 36

Document VideoLabs, Inc. et al v. Roku, Inc., 1:23-cv-01136, No. 36 (D.Del. Jul. 18, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 18 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Roku, Inc.- filed by VideoLabs, Inc., VL Collective IP LLC

Document VideoLabs, Inc. et al v. Roku, Inc., 1:23-cv-01136, No. 18 (D.Del. Mar. 8, 2024)
Complaint
VideoLabs then compiled a portfolio of these core patents, obtaining them from leading companies, including Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Alcatel-Lucent S.A., Siemens AG, Swisscom AG, 3Com, Panasonic, LG, and Nokia.
To this day, VideoLabs continues to promote an efficient, respected, and balanced intellectual property environment where technology companies have predictable design freedom and innovators who contribute impactful patented inventions can obtain fair and just compensation.
As discussed with regard to the ’236 patent infra, both CAS and DRM systems are critically important technologies for securing valuable content programming intended for myriad consumer devices.
In addition to making real-time streaming of content possible, every incremental increase in compression efficiency yields substantial benefits to companies that store, process, transmit or access video.
In addition to making real-time streaming of content possible, every incremental increase in compression efficiency yields substantial benefits to companies that store, process, transmit or access video.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Roku, Inc

Document VideoLabs, Inc. et al v. Roku, Inc., 1:23-cv-01136, No. 9 (D.Del. Feb. 16, 2024)
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 35 U.S.C. § 101, Defendant Roku, Inc. (“Roku”) moves to dismiss Counts I–IV of Plaintiffs VideoLabs, Inc. and VL Collective IP LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)’s complaint (D.I.
1) with prejudice on the grounds that U.S. Patent Nos. RE43,113; 7,233,790; 7,440,559; and 8,605,794 fail to recite patentable subject matter under
The grounds for this motion are set forth more fully in Roku’s Opening Brief and the materials and information cited therein.
The Court, having considered Defendant Roku, Inc. (“Roku”)’s Motion to Dismiss Counts I–IV of Plaintiffs VideoLabs, Inc. and VL Collective IP LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)’s complaint (D.I.
Defendant’s motion is hereby GRANTED; The claims of U.S. Patent Nos. RE43,113; 7,233,790; 7,440,559 and 8,605,794 fail to recite patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101; and
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Roku, Inc. ( Filing fee $ ...

Document VideoLabs, Inc. et al v. Roku, Inc., 1:23-cv-01136, No. 1 (D.Del. Oct. 11, 2023)
Complaint
VideoLabs spent millions of dollars and thousands of hours analyzing the video space and identifying the patents that reflect the innovations with the highest impact.
VideoLabs then compiled a portfolio of these core patents, obtaining them from leading companies, including Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Alcatel-Lucent S.A., Siemens AG, Swisscom AG, 3Com, Panasonic, LG, and Nokia.
To this day, VideoLabs continues to promote an efficient, respected, and balanced intellectual property environment where technology companies have predictable design freedom and innovators who contribute impactful patented inventions can obtain fair and just compensation.
growth and rising levels of consumer expectations, a new and better framework was necessary to lay the foundation for a next generation content delivery model that provided the best and most efficient service to end users.
As discussed with regard to the ’236 patent infra, both CAS and DRM systems are critically important technologies for securing valuable content programming intended for myriad consumer devices.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 23

Document VideoLabs, Inc. et al v. Roku, Inc., 1:23-cv-01136, No. 23 (D.Del. Apr. 5, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 20

Document VideoLabs, Inc. et al v. Roku, Inc., 1:23-cv-01136, No. 20 (D.Del. Mar. 8, 2024)

cite Cite Document
1 2 >>