Google has confirmed that none of its work-product privilege claims are based on reasonably anticipated litigation in this case.

Appellant’s Motion for Disqualification Is Baseless Appellant’s motion cites no authority that could possibly justify disqualifying Google’s counsel because there is none.

Start Time__________ End Time ____________ Recess (if more than ½ hr) ________ to _________ Total Time ________hour(s) ________minute(s) Case #_______________________________________________ Michael P. Shea Honorable Judge ______________________________________ C. Sichanh Deputy Clerk _________________________________________ Nielsen Counsel for Pla(s) _____________________________________ Ondeck, Goldberg Counsel for Dft(s) _____________________________________ J. Monette Reporter/ECRO/Courtsmart _____________________________ Interpreter______________________ Language ____________ ✔ Hearing held in person by video by telephone

Motion/Oral Argument ____ Show Cause Hearing Judgment Debtor Exam ____ Pretrial Conference Status Conference ____ Settlement Conference ____ Evidentiary Hearing ____ Scheduling Conference ____ Other: ________________