• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 24-38 of 6,586 results

No. 01208709365 PER CURIAM ORDER [2099916] filed denying motion for stay of proceedings [2098492-2]

Document USA, et al v. Google LLC, 25-5016, No. 01208709365 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 10, 2025)
USCA Case #25-5016 Document #2099916 Filed: 02/10/2025 Page 1 of 2 United States Court of Appeals
USCA Case #25-5016 Document #2099916 Filed: 02/10/2025 Page 2 of 2 United States Court of Appeals
September Term, 2024 No. 25-5016 To enhance the clarity of their briefs, the parties are urged to limit the use of abbreviations, including acronyms.
Parties are strongly encouraged to hand deliver the paper copies of their briefs to the Clerk’s office on the date due.
All briefs and appendices must contain the date that the case is scheduled for oral argument at the top of the cover.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 01208708721 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [2099579] to motion for other relief [2098492-2] filed by Commonwealth ...

Document USA, et al v. Google LLC, 25-5016, No. 01208708721 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 7, 2025)
Apple’s stay motion clears none of these bars.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 01208708681 RESPONSE [2099561] to motion [2098492-2] filed by Google LLC [Service Date: 02/07/2025 by CM/ECF ...

Document USA, et al v. Google LLC, 25-5016, No. 01208708681 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 7, 2025)
To Defendant-Appellee’s knowledge, none of these cases has previously been before this Court or any other appellate court.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 01208707367 PER CURIAM ORDER [2098804] filed ORDERED that the appellees respond to the emergency motion ...

Document USA, et al v. Google LLC, 25-5016, No. 01208707367 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 4, 2025)
USCA Case #25-5016 Document #2098804 Filed: 02/04/2025 Page 1 of 1 United States Court of Appeals
September Term, 2024 Filed On: February 4, 2025 No. 25-5016 United States of America, et al.,
Upon consideration of the emergency motion for a stay of proceedings or, in the alternative, to expedite the appeal, it is ORDERED that the appellees respond to the emergency motion by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, February 7, 2025.
Any reply is due by 10:00 a.m. on Monday, February 10, 2025.
Per Curiam
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 01208705412 NOTICE OF APPEAL [2097735] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-03010-APM ...

Document USA, et al v. Google LLC, 25-5016, No. 01208705412 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 31, 2025)
... Filed: 01/31/2025 Page 1 of 258 U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:20−cv−03010−APM Internal Use Only APPEAL,CONSOL,TYPE−A Date Filed: 10/20/2020 Jury Demand: None ...
But none of the cases Apple cites 4 Nor is the court convinced that Google lacks incentive to make Apple’s position known to the court.
... See id. at 59:12–60:25. 12 251 Case 1:20-cv-03010-APM Document 1157 Filed 01/29/25 Page 252 of 258 USCA Case #25-5016 Document #2097735 Filed: 01/31/2025 Page 252 of 258 involved an antitrust enforcement action, and none ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 01208705412 NOTICE OF APPEAL [2097735] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-03010-APM ...

Document USA, et al v. Google LLC, 25-5016, No. 01208705412 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 31, 2025)
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 01208613567 MOTION [2049704] for summary affirmance filed by Google LLC (Service Date: 04/16/2024 by US ...

Document USA, et al v. Google LLC, 24-5006, No. 01208613567 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 16, 2024)
Alternatively, Google respectfully requests that the Court summarily affirm the District Court’s orders subject to those Supplemental Notices of Appeal.
For example, in Mr. Greenspan’s motion for joinder he characterized himself alternatively as a “Plaintiff” or “Prospective Plaintiff” and apparently sought to join as defendants a number of law firms and a former assistant attorney general who served as in-house counsel to a non-party.
In all events, the District Court properly resolved each of the frivolous motions referenced in the Supplemental Notices of Appeal, and its January 25, 2024 orders should be affirmed.
There is nothing to reconsider with regard to ECF No. 794 because the District Court granted the motion in question and took judicial notice of the documents that Mr. Greenspan filed.
As indicated above and in Google’s February 26, 2024 Motion for Summary Affirmance, the District Court correctly denied Mr. Greenspan’s request for reconsideration of the determination that intervention is unwarranted after giving due consideration to the materials he filed.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 01208599741

Document USA, et al v. Google LLC, 24-5006, No. 01208599741 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 26, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 01208596052

Document USA, et al v. Google LLC, 24-5006, No. 01208596052 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 13, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 01208666685

Document USA, et al v. Google LLC, 24-5006, No. 01208666685 (D.C. Cir. Sep. 29, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 645

Document Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 3:19-cv-00710, No. 645 (D.Conn. Apr. 7, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1207

Document UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC, 1:20-cv-03010, No. 1207 (D.D.C. Apr. 3, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1075

Document In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation, 3:21-md-02981, No. 1075 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 28, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1201

Document UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC, 1:20-cv-03010, No. 1201 (D.D.C. Mar. 28, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 1200

Document UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC, 1:20-cv-03010, No. 1200 (D.D.C. Mar. 27, 2025)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... >>