Since that time, 17 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District of Florida.

With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable K. Michael Moore.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of Florida and assigned to Judge Moore.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District of Florida for the reasons stated in the order of June 5, 2023, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable K. Michael Moore.

The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof.

MIRAMAX HOLDING CORP., and MIRAMAX FILM NY, LLC f/k/a MIRAMAX FILM CORP., Defendants.

Nobo ; oC Pe A, (|

Jeannie S. Rhee, Esq., having applied to this court for admission pro hac vice to represent Defendant Creative Artists Agency, LLCin this action, and said applicant having submitted, in support thereof, an affirmation by Loretta Lynch, Esq., whois a memberofthe Bar of the State of New York and attorney of record herein for Defendant, an affidavit of the applicant, and a Certificate of Good Standing from the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia, in which the applicant was admitted to the practice of law, and the court having reviewed the foregoing submissions and due deliberations having been had,it is now therefore ORDEREDthatthe motion is granted unopposed, and that Jeannie S. Rhee, Esq. is permitted to appear andto participate in this action on behalf of Defendant Creative Artists Agency, LLCin this action; and it is further

ORDEREDthatsheshall at all times during this action be associated with counsel who is a memberin good standing of the Bar of the State of New York andis attorney of record for the aforesaid parties; and all pleadings, briefs, and other papers filed with the court shall be signed by the attorney of record, who shall be responsible for such papers and for the conductof this action; andit is further ORDEREDthat, pursuant to Section 520.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals and Section 1250.4(e) of the Practice Rules of the Appellate Division, the attorney hereby admitted pro hac vice shall be familiar with and abide by the standards of professional conduct imposed upon membersof the New York Bar, including the Rules of the Courts governing conductof attorneys and the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility; and it is further ORDEREDthatshe shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York with respect to any acts occurring during the course of her participation in this matter; andit is further ORDEREDthatsaid counsel shall notify the court immediately of any matter or eventin this or any otherjurisdiction that affects her standing as a memberof the bar.

this coushbetes ple Meées: oy aud btder oo fle Cousl Dated: Maral, (3, +014 fs

4 Nonetheless, Quinto offered to re-file the draft bylaws with the note from counsel redacted.

Nonetheless, the court stated that Quinto’s argument there was no continuing effect on the proceeding “would have actually probably worked if you had responded to the discovery that was propounded on you.” However, “because ...

If no party designates Confidential Information or Highly Confidential Information in a deposition either at the deposition or any time on or before seven days after the delivery of the final transcript, then none of the transcript will be ...

Any Non-Party2 who produces information to any Party pursuant to a subpoena or other discovery request may avail themselves of the protections put in place by this Order by designating

Information designated as “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” may, however, be disclosed to expert witnesses retained for this litigation upon their execution of the written acknowledgment set forth in Section 8, below, which shall be deemed to Case 1:23-md-03076-KMM Document 483 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2024 Page 6 of 10 include their agreement and acknowledgment that “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information shall not be disclosed to the Parties, their employees, agents, or representatives, and shall not be used for any purpose other than the conduct of this litigation.

The purpose of imposing these duties is to afford the designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to protect any confidentiality interest it may have in the court or with the body from which the subpoena, order or directive was issued.

assemble and make available for return to the designating Party all materials, documents, and transcripts containing “Confidential Information,” including all copies thereof; or

Requesting a reasonable accommodation under this paragraph will not prejudice a Party’s right to later object to the designation of such document as “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” in accordance with the procedures set forth above.

Specially Appearing Defendant Erika Kullberg’s Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 446) is DENIED, except that discovery related to service of process shall be limited to discovery addressing whether service of process was properly effected on Erika Kullberg at 40 Waterside Plaza, Apt.

1 During the January 17 hearing, Plaintiffs announced that they had settled with Defendant Brian Jung and that the discovery issues involving him were resolved.

In addition, Defendants Erika Kullberg, Creators Agency LLC, and Jaspreet Singh shall each submit to a deposition addressing personal jurisdiction on or before February 1, 2024.

However, the deposition of Arzu Malik shall be conducted by zoom, shall be limited to 2 hours, and shall be addressed to the events of April 6, 2023.

Defendants Deltec Bank and Trust Company Limited and Jean Chalopin’s Motion to Quash Jurisdictional Discovery or for a Protective Order (ECF No. 471) is DENIED.

This matter is before the Court on the Specially Appearing Defendant Erika Kullberg’s Motion to Quash Nonparty Subpoena.

After a careful review of the motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, on or before 5:30 p.m. on Friday, January 12, 2024, the Plaintiffs shall file their response to Defendant Kullberg’s Motion to Quash Nonparty Subpoena (ECF No. 458).

It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant Kullberg’s motion is scheduled for hearing at 3:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 17, 2024, in the 6th Floor Courtroom of the C. Clyde Atkins United States Courthouse, 301 N. Miami Avenue, Miami, FL 33128, in conjunction with other discovery matters previously scheduled for hearing.

It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties shall confer, prior to the January 17th hearing, in an effort to narrow or resolve the issues concerning the nonparty subpoena that is the subject of the motion.

Case 1:23-md-03076-KMM Document 460 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/11/2024 Page 2 of 2 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the parties shall contact the undersigned’s Chambers in accordance with the undersigned’s posted discovery procedures if this dispute is resolved prior to the January 17th hearing.

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel and Expedite Discovery as to Temasek in Accordance with the District Court’s December 18, 2023 Order.

After a careful review of the motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, on or before 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 16, 2024, Defendants Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited and Temasek International USA LLC shall file their response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel and Expedite Discovery as to Temasek in Accordance with the District Court’s December 18, 2023 Order (ECF No. 455).

It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiffs’ motion is scheduled for hearing at 3:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 17, 2024, in the 6th Floor Courtroom of the C. Clyde Atkins United States Courthouse, 301 N. Miami Avenue, Miami, FL 33128, in conjunction with other discovery matters previously scheduled for hearing.

It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties shall confer, prior to the January 17th hearing, to address the discovery disputes raised in the Plaintiffs’ motion in an effort to narrow and resolve any outstanding issues concerning the jurisdictional discovery requests that are the

Case 1:23-md-03076-KMM Document 459 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2024 Page 2 of 2 subject of the motion.