VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge.

The parties have each submitted unopposed motions to seal and/or redact certain portions of their briefing and supporting exhibits in connection to their respective oppositions to the cross-motions for summary judgment.

Both motions to seal and/or redact are GRANTED.

The Court respectfully directs the Clerk of the Court to maintain the Selected Parties viewing level for Docket Nos. 136, 137, 138, 145, 146, and 148 as accessible only to Plaintiff, Defendant, and the Court in this action.

The parties are directed, to the extent applicable, to file public, redacted versions of the briefs and supporting exhibits in connection to the summary judgment motions.

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 033) 938, 939, 940, 941, 942, 943, 944, 945, 946, 947, 954 were read on this motion to

The motion filed by Defendant Nir Meir (“Meir”) and his counsel, the Davidoff Law Firm, PLLC (“Davidoff”), seeking an order pursuant to CPLR 5240 modifying the Restraining Notice to permit Davidoff to receive payment of legal services rendered to Meir, is withdrawn and denied as moot in accordance with the Stipulation and Order agreed to by the parties and so-ordered by the Court (NYSCEF 955).

This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.

*Action remnaiming assiast candmues defend•=en between the andersigned, the attorneys of record far all the parties to the above entitled action,

admin to the operaticaafthe vehicle bearingNew York State license plate munber

that the of the Amandad 2, Parties agree portions Complaint referenelag New York State license plate

for whom a -% has been appointed ar conservatee and no personnot a party has an interest in the subject matter of the action, the above entitledaction be, and the same hereby is di•anatin=vt withpreludice, as against Defendant,

Parties agree that asid di•anati- is done so as to remove any 'death stsy' an the meter arising finm the decease of defendant

were read onthis motion for UponPlaintiffs’ motion along with the Affirmation of Mark Hatch-Miller, Esq., a memberin good standing of the New Yorkbar,the Affidavit of Justin A. Nelson, Esq. annexing a Letter of Good Standing from the State Bar of Texas submitted in support for an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR §§ 520.11, 1250.4(e), and 602.2 permitting Affidavit of Justin A. Nelson, Esq. to appear pro hacvice before this Court as counselfor Plaintiffs; and no opposition having been filed: it is 655151/2023_ ANDERSON,GRIFFIN ET ALvs.

ORDEREDthatPlaintiffs’ motion for Affidavit of Justin A. Nelson, Esq. to appear pro hac vice is GRANTEDandsaid applicant is permitted to appear and to participate in this action on behalf of Fidelis; and it is further ORDEREDthat the attorney admitted pro hacvice shall be at all times during this action be associated with counsel who is a memberin good standing of the Bar of the State of New York andis attorney of record for the Defendant; andit is further ORDEREDthatall pleadings, briefs, and other papers filed with the Court shall be signed by the attorney of record, whoshall be responsible for such papers and for the conduct of this action; andit is further ORDEREDthat, pursuant to Section 520.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals and Section 602.2 of the Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department, the attorney admitted pro hac vice shall be familiar with and abide by the standards of professional conduct imposed upon members of the New York Bar, including the rules of the courts governing the conduct of attorneys and the Rules of Professional Conduct; andit is further ORDEREDthat the attorney admitted pro hac vice shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York with respect to any acts occurring during the course ofhis participation in this matter; andit is further ORDEREDthat said counsel shall notify the court immediately of any matter or eventin this or any other jurisdiction that affects their standing as a memberofthe bar.

This constitutes the decision and order of the Court.

655151/2023 ANDERSON, GRIFFIN ET AL vs. LUBIN, JOSEP; Motion No. 004

655151/2023_ ANDERSON,GRIFFIN ET AL vs. LUBIN, JOSEPH ET AL Motion No. 004 Page 3 of 3

ORDERED that the motion of Mark Hatch-Miller, Esq. of the law firm of Susman Godfrey L.L.P., attorney for the plaintiffs, for the admission pro hac vice of attorney Allen J. Hernandez, Esq., of the same firm, located at 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100, Houston, Texas 77002, a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Texas is granted, without opposition, upon the proof of qualifications as required by the laws and rules of the State of New York, and it is further,

ORDERED that Allen J. Hernandez, Esq. is permitted to appear and to participate in this proceeding on behalf of the plaintiffs, and it is further,

Page 1 of 2 ORDERED that, inasmuch as Mark Hatch-Miller, Esq. is a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of New York and maintains an office for the practice of law at One Manhattan West, 50th floor, New York, NY 10001, that Allen J. Hernandez, Esq. shall at all times during this action be associated with Mark Hatch-Miller, Esq., who shall be the attorney of record for the plaintiffs, and it is further,

ORDERED that Allen J. Hernandez, Esq. shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York with respect to any acts occurring during the course of his participation in this matter, and it is further,

ORDERED that Allen J. Hernandez, Esq. shall notify the court immediately of any matter or event in this or any other jurisdiction that affects his standing as a member of the bar, and it is further,

Plaintiff(s); All plaintiffs by Justin Nelson, Ryan Caughey, Allen Hernandez of Susman Godfrey LLP Defendant(s): Defendants Joseph Lubin, Consensus Systems LLC, ConsenSysInc., and Matt Corva by Tibor L. Nagy and Tracey Appleton of Nagy Wolfe Appleton LLP.

Defendants Consensys Software Inc. by James P. Smith of Winston & Strawn LLP.

Defendants JP Morgan and UmarFarooq by Andrew Ditchfield, Zainab Qureshi, and Alexandra Denis of Davis Polk & Wardewell LLP .

All Parties [_Pefendant(s) L Plaintiff(s) shall be held 12/1/2025 Parties to meet and confer in good faith in scheduling and noticing depositions utkueehehebe ter Wo) de puscAuy ak sre sha Curdaet—or

i$ am 13ve (6) If awmetian relating to disclosures raised additionatdisetesure-issies; the parties shall: meet and confer in goodfaith,