• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 24-38 of 3,648 results

USA v. Vazquez Campos

Docket 1:19-cr-00584, New York Southern District Court (Aug. 16, 2019)
Judge Analisa Torres, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsECF, PRIOR
Defendant Angel Isaac Vazquez Campos
Plaintiff USA
Vazquez Campos
cite Cite Docket

USA v. Jackson

Docket 1:19-cr-00356, New York Eastern District Court (Aug. 6, 2019)
Judge Allyne R. Ross, presiding
DivisionBrooklyn
FlagsAPPEAL
Defendant Tyquan Jackson
Plaintiff USA
cite Cite Docket

USA v. Wilburn

Docket 1:19-cr-00108, New York Eastern District Court (Feb. 28, 2019)
Judge Eric R. Komitee, presiding
DivisionBrooklyn
Defendant Andre Wilburn
Plaintiff USA
Wilburn

USA v. Jones

Docket 1:19-cr-00125, New York Southern District Court (Feb. 25, 2019)
Judge Vernon S. Broderick, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsCLOSED, ECF
DeadlineThe status conference currently scheduled for March 19, 2025 is adjourned to May 6, 2025 at 11 AM. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 3/18/2025) (jw)
Defendant Chaz Jones
Defendant Anthony Martin
Plaintiff USA
...

USA v. Hammatt

Docket 1:19-cr-00067, New York Southern District Court (Jan. 31, 2019)
Judge Paul G. Gardephe, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsECF
Defendant Christopher Hammatt
Defendant Susan Hammatt
Defendant Joseph Hoats
...

USA v. Fertides

Docket 1:18-cr-00319, New York Southern District Court (May 2, 2018)
Judge Laura Taylor Swain, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
FlagsCLOSED, ECF
Defendant Yasmil Fertides
Defendant Milton Chardon
Defendant Christian Pabon
...

USA v. Arias-Baez

Docket 1:18-cr-00309, New York Southern District Court (Apr. 26, 2018)
Judge Ronnie Abrams, presiding
DivisionFoley Square
USA
Arias-Baez
cite Cite Docket

United States of America v. Kassim (Mumuni)

Docket 15-1842, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit (June 8, 2015)
Appellee USA United States of America
Defendant Nabil Kassim, AKA Kasola, AKA Sealed Defendant 1
Defendant Bassam Basha
...
cite Cite Docket

USA v. Paulino, et al.

Docket 1:18-cr-00173, New York Southern District Court
USA
Paulino
cite Cite Docket

No. 235 CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE AS TO SPECIFIC PROPERTY/MONEY JUDGMENT as to Anayda ...

Document USA v. Peeples et al, 1:23-cr-00141, No. 235 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 5, 2025)
One (1) Audemars Piguet Automatic Watch, silver with Black Face, serial number 0688H57528;: Case 1:23-cr-00141-VEC Document 235_Filed 03/05/25 Page 2 of7
d, One (1) Rolex Presidential Watch, 18K gold with emerald face, serial number M742138; One (1) Rolex Watch inside a green box with blackface, with inscription “Montres Rolex A.-Geneve Suisse;” and One (1) Glock 9mmpistol, Model 19, serial number AFSM612; (a. through d. collectively, the “Specific Property”), WHEREAS, on or about July 12, 2024, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count Oneofthe Indictment and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2)(A): (i) a sum of money equal to $104,350 in United States currency, representing proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment; and (ii) all right, title and interest of the Defendant in the Specific Property; WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $104,350 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, for which the Defendantis jointly and severally liable with co-defendants Christopher Peeples, Khalil Bey-Muhammad, Gerald Lee, Malcolm Reasonover, Demetrius Torry, and Gilbert Huertas (the “Co-defendants”), to the extent forfeiture money judgments are entered against the Co-defendants in this case; WHEREAS, the Defendant further consents to the forfeiture of all her right, title and interest in the Specific Property, which constitute proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count Oneof the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained; Case 1:23-cr-00141-VEC Document 235_Filed 03/05/25 Page 3of7 WHEREAS,the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions ofthe Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence, with the exception of Specific Property, and WHEREAS,pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(g)}, and Rules 32.2(b\(3), and 32.2(b)\(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Government is now entitled, pending any assettion of third-party claims, to reduce the Specific Property to its possession and to notify any and all persons who reasonably appearto be a potential claimant of their interest herein; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED,by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Matthew Podolsky, Acting United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney Justin Horton, of counsel, and the Defendant and her counsel, Joshua J. Horowitz, Esq., that: 1, As a result of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, to which the Defendantpled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $104,350 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count Oneof the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, for which the Defendantis jointly and severally liable with the Co-defendants, to the extent a forfeiture money judgmentis entered against the Co-defendants in this case, shall!
Case 1:23-cr-00141-VEC Document 235_Filed 03/05/25 Page 4of7 3, Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure,this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgmentis final as to the Defendant ANAYDA HUERTAS, and shall be deemedpart of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith, 4, Ali payments on the outstanding money judgmentshall be made by postal money order, bankorcertified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Illicit Finance and Money Laundering Unit, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, New York 10278 and shall indicate the Defendant’s name and case number,
Pursuant to 32.2 (b)(6)(A) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Government shall send notice to any person who reasonably appears to be a potential claimant with standing to contest the forfeiture in the ancillary proceeding.
The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as fo Specific Property/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemedan original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.
cite Cite Document

No. 231 CONSENT ORDER OF RESTITUTION as to Anayda Huertas

Document USA v. Peeples et al, 1:23-cr-00141, No. 231 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 26, 2025)
The defendant’sliability to pay restitution shall continue unabated until either the defendant has paid the full amountof restitution ordered herein, or every Case 1:23-cr-00141-VEC Document 231_Filed 02/26/25 Page 2 of4 victim in Schedule A has'recovered the total amountofeach loss from therestitution paid by the defendant and all co-defendants ordered to pay the same victims.
While serving the term of imprisonment, the defendant shall make installment payments toward restitution and may do so through the Bureau of Prisons’ (BOP) Inmate Financial Responsibility Plan IFRP).
Any unpaid amount remaining upon release from prison will be paid in installments of at least 10 percent of the defendant’s gross income on the first of each month, This schedule is without prejudice to the Government taking enforcement actions, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3613, to the extent warranted.
Checks and money orders shall be made payable to the “SDNY Clerk of Court” and mailed or delivered to: United States Courthouse, 500 Pear!
4, Change in Circumstances The defendant shall notify, within 30 days, the Clerk of Court, the United States Probation Office (during any period of probation or supervised release), and the United States Attorney’s Office, 86 Chambers Street, 3rd Floor, New York, New York 10007 (Attn: Financial Litigation Program) of (1) any change of the defendant’s name, residerice, or mailing address or (2) any material change in the defendant’s financial resources that affects the defendant’s ability to pay restitution in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k).
cite Cite Document

No. 232 JUDGMENT as to Anayda Huertas (7)

Document USA v. Peeples et al, 1:23-cr-00141, No. 232 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 26, 2025)
Motion for Judgment
The sentence is imposed pursuant to [_] The defendant has been found not guilty on count{s) open and underlying Mare dismissed on the motion of the United States.
It is ordered that the defendant mustnotify the United States attorney forthis district within 30 days of any change ofname,residence, _. or mailing address untilall fines, restitution,costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgmentare fully paid.
as directed by the probation officer, the Bureau of Prisons, or any state sex offender registration agencyin the location where you reside, work, are a student, or were convicted of a qualifying offense.
You must not own, possess, or have access to a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or dangerous weapon(i.e., anything that was designed, or was modified for, the specific purpose of causing bodily injury or death to another person such as nunchakusortasers).
The Court authorizes the release of available psychological or psychiatric evaluations and reports, including the Presentence Repori, to the health care provider.
cite Cite Document

No. 533 OPINION AND ORDER Jowenky Nunez, Jr, et al

Document USA v. Nunez et al, 1:22-cr-00293, No. 533 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2025)
The court explained that this is analogous to the doctrine of “ratification”: “just as a minor legally incapable of entering a contract may nonetheless be found to have ‘ratified’ a contract by taking actions after attaining majority consistent ...
cite Cite Document

No. 230 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting 229 LETTER MOTION filed by Anayda Huertas (7), addressed to Judge ...

Document USA v. Peeples et al, 1:23-cr-00141, No. 230 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 13, 2025)
al., – Anayda Huertas, Docket No. 23-CR-141 (VEC) Dear Judge Caproni: I represent Defendant Anayda Huertas in the above matter, who is presently scheduled to be sentenced by Your Honor on February 25, 2025 at 10:00 A.M.
I write to respectfully request permission to file under seal a brief supplemental sentencing submission on behalf of Ms. Huertas.
The reason for this request is because the supplemental submission contains medical records and information pertaining to treatment and diagnosis of Ms. Huertas.
This information falls squarely within the category of documents requiring heightened caution for public filing under Section 21.4 of the SDNY Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions, 2023 Edition.
The government, through AUSA Justin Horton, has no objection to this application.
cite Cite Document

No. 296 ORDER as to Sean Robinson

Document USA v. Williams et al, 1:14-cr-00130, No. 296 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 12, 2025)
LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court is in xreceipt of Defendant’s motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (1) (A), which has been filed under seal because it contains personai medical information.
The Government shail respond by March 12, 2025.
Defendant may reply by April 11, 2025.
Dated: New York, New York February 12, 2025
Senior United States District Judge
cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... >>