SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: This Order is entered, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(t) and the Due Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No 116-182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21, 2020), to confirm the Government's disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, and to summarize the possible consequences of violating those obligations.

In the event the Government believes that a disclosure under this Order would compromise witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement technique, or any other substantial government interest, it may apply to the Court for a modification of its obligations, which may include in camera review or withholding or subjecting to a protective order all or part of the information otherwise subject to disclosure.

2 For purposes of this Order, the Government has an affirmative obligation to seek all information subject to disclosure under this Order from all current or former federal, state, and local prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and other officers who have participated in the prosecution, or investigation that led to the prosecution, of the offense or offenses with which the defendant is charged.

2 The Classified Information Procedures Act sets forth separate procedures to be followed in the event that the Government believes matters relating to classified information may arise in connection with the prosecution.

(4) impose contempt or other sanctions on any lawyer responsible for violations of the Government's disclosure obligations, or refer the matter to disciplinary authorities; (5) dismiss charges before trial or vacate a conviction after trial or a guilty plea; or (6) enter any other order that is just under the circumstances.

Re: United States v. Iyaury Rodriguez Rosario 22 Cr.

Mark DeMarco and I represent Iyaury Rodriguez Rosario in the above matter.

We have conferred with Sarah Sacks, counsel for defendant Hugo Rodriguez, and Ms. Sacks has agreed to stand in for us for the limited purpose of this conference.

Mr. Rodriguez Rosario is aware of the issue and consents to Ms. Sacks standing in at the status conference.

Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth E. Macedonio Elizabeth E. Macedonio Mark DeMarco Attorneys for the Defendant Iyaury Rodriguez Rosario

Honorable J. Paul Oetken United States District Judge United States District Court 40 Foley Square New York, N.Y 10007

Dear Judge Oetken: I represent Argenis Tavarez, who is a defendant in United States v Nunez, et al.

Calvin Scholar agreed to stand up for Mr. Tavarez with Your Honor’s permission.

I discussed with Mr. Tavarez my inability to attend the conference, and that Mr. Scholar will stand in for me.

Mr. Tavarez advised he consents to having Mr. Scholar stand in for me at the conference.

Attorney-At-Law 20 Vesey St. Suite 400 New York, NY 10007 9/16/2024 Hon.

Analisa Torres United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 15D New York, New York, 10007 VIA ECF and Electronic Mail Re: Sentencing date for U.S. v. Darcy Copeland, 24 Cr.

450 (AT) Dear Judge Torres: Mr. Darcy Copeland’s sentence is currently scheduled before Your Honor for September 30, 2024, at 3:00 p.m. Because of a calendar conflict, I respectfully request, with no objection from the government, that the sentence be shortly adjourned, if possible, for either October 3 or 4.

This week I exchanged emails with AUSA Adam Sowlati, and he relayed that he is available for Mr. Copeland’s sentence on October 3 (all day) and October 4 (all day except 10 a.m. to 11 a.m.).

Probation Officer in charge of the expedited Pre-Sentence Report, and she informed that the PSR would be filed shortly.

filed a petition On October 26, 2022, Stephen N. Preziosi Esq. for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on behalf of defendant Donque Tyrell.

On April, 14, 2023, Tyrell’s former counsel, Harlan J. Protass Esq., moved to withdraw as counsel to Tyrell, explaining that Tyrell had retained Preziosi to file and litigate his § 2255 motion.

Most recently, on August 21, 2024, Tyrell sent the Court a letter addendumto his § 2255 motion, which has now been docketed.

Because Preziosi filed the § 2255 motion on Tyrell’s behalf and because nothing in the record suggests that Tyrell wishes Protass to continue as his counsel in this matter, Protass’s motion to withdraw is granted.

Because Tyrell is represented by counsel in this matter, the Court will disregard Tyrell’s pro se letter.

undersigned counsel, and the defendant having requested discovery under Fed. R. Crim.

77)to govern discovery materials in this matter that was signed by all parties then in the case.

July 29, 2022, the Court amended the Protective Order (Dkt. 80) to explicitly allow disclosure of

2.On or about August 2, 2022, defendant Jowenky Nunez, Sr., was arrested and appointed

Southern District of New York by: Isl Kevin Mead Kevin Mead Sarah L. Kushner Ashley C. Nicolas Assis t United States rneys Date: August 27, 2024 Calvin Haro Scholar, Esq.

attorneys previously appointed in this case, Sabrina P. Shroff and John A. Diaz, and Pro Bono counsel Luca Marzorati and Mari Grace, are hereby relieved as counsel.

attorney Calvin Scholar is hereby appointed to represent the defendant.

Dated: August 26, 2024 New York, New York

United States District Judge

The Governmentwill make disclosure to the defendants of documents, objects and information, including electronically stored information (“ESI”), pursuantto Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, and the Government’s general obligation to produce exculpatory and impeachmentmaterial in criminal cases, all of which will be referred to herein as “disclosure material.” The Government’s disclosure material may include material that(i) affects the privacy and confidentiality of individuals and entities; (ii) would impede,if prematurely disclosed, the Government’s ongoing investigation of unchargedindividuals; (iii) would risk prejudicial pretrial publicity if publicly disseminated; and/or (iv) is not authorized to be disclosed to the public or disclosed beyond that whichis necessary for the defense of this criminal case.

Certain of the Government’s disclosure material, referred to herein as “Sensitive Disclosure Material,” may contain information that identifies, or could lead to the identification of, witnesses who maybe subjectto intimidation or obstruction, and whoselives, persons, and property, as well as the lives, persons, and property of loved ones, will be subject to risk of harm absent the protective considerationsset forth herein, or information that may raise a heightenedrisk to the privacy and confidentiality of individuals or to an ongoing investigation of uncharged individuals.

Discovery materials produced by the Government to the defendants or their counsel that include a Bates or other label stating “AEO,” shall be deemed “AEO Material.” 4.

The entry of a protective order in this case will permit the Governmentto produce expeditiously the disclosure material without furtherlitigation or the need for substantial redaction.

Cagade22:2?-00202IPR0PO0 DDccmeattBD Ai#ec0G8208224 Pagage dof 20 that they are boundby their terms,andsheshall instruct such other personsthat further disclosure is prohibited.

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: WHEREAS, with the Defendant’s consent, his guilty plea allocution was made before

United States Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo on July 26, 2024; WHEREAS, a transcript of the allocution was made and thereafter was transmitted to the District Court; WHEREAS, upon review of that transcript and the record in this case, this Court has determined that the Defendant entered the guilty plea knowingly and voluntarily and that there was a factual basis for the guilty plea; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s guilty plea is accepted.

Sentencing in this matter will be held on September 30, 2024, at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom 15D of the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl St, New York, NY 10007.

By September 16, 2024, Defendant shall file his sentencing submission.

By September 23, 2024, the Government shall submit its sentencing submission.

Colleen McMahon United States District Court Judge 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 1007 Re: United States v. Ramadus Williams Docket No. 10 CR 391-59 (CM) Dear Judge McMahon: I had been appointed to represent Ramadus Williams in this matter.

What prompts this letter is that Mr. Williams has tickets to fly with his family tomorrow to Jamaica as a celebration of his daughter's birthday.

A short while ago today, in a conversation with Probation Officer Glen Spence, Mr. Williams was advised that he needed Court permission to make this trip, a requirement Mr. Williams had not focused on.

Colleen McMahon July 9, 2024 I apologize for the lateness of this request but the matter only came to my attention a short while ago.

cc: AUSA Michael Maimin USPO Glen Spence ( via email and ECF filing) /