• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 39-53 of 245,557 results

Thomas Steinke d/b/a Edison Signs vs Hans Peter Frees, Outdoor Excapes of Lake...

Docket 27-CV-18-1882, Minnesota State, Hennepin County, District Court
Burke Susan N., presiding.
Case TypeContract
TagsContract, Civil
Plaintiff Edison Signs
Plaintiff Thomas Steinke
Defendant Hans Peter Frees
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 1631 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DETENTION AND DEMAND FOR SPEEDY TRIAL ...

Document USA v. Brown et al, 0:23-cr-00160, No. 1631 (D.Minn. Jan. 9, 2025)
Motion for ReconsiderationDenied
Ninety-four overt acts in furtherance of the racketeering conspiracy were alleged, five of which were murders, and many others of which were serious crimes such as aggravated robbery and narcotics distribution.
Without belaboring the chronology, suffice it to say that from August 21, 2024 to the present, motions have continuously stopped the Speedy Trial Act clock.
However, Mr. Wright does not draw the Court’s attention to any way in which the passage of time, in and of itself, has prejudiced his defense, nor does he assert that the prosecution has manipulated the delay for tactical advantage.
As to the Barker v. Wingo factor of who is more responsible for the delay, the prosecution or the CASE 0:23-cr-00160-NEB-JFD Doc. 1631 Filed 01/09/25 Page 6 of 7 defense, Mr. Wright asserts the novel theory that because it charged a large case, the United States bears the blame for the delay, ignoring the reality that the prosecution’s charging decisions follow the facts developed during an investigation.
CASE 0:23-cr-00160-NEB-JFD Doc. 1631 Filed 01/09/25 Page 7 of 7 For all the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Ja’Darius Wright’s Motion for Reconsideration of Detention and Demand for Speedy Trial (Dkt. No. 1567) is DENIED.
cite Cite Document

No. 1612

Document USA v. Brown et al, 0:23-cr-00160, No. 1612 (D.Minn. Dec. 27, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 1569

Document USA v. Brown et al, 0:23-cr-00160, No. 1569 (D.Minn. Nov. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 324

Document USA v. Kaeding, 0:21-cr-00169, No. 324 (D.Minn. Nov. 18, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 366

Document USA v. SEALED, 0:23-cr-00156, No. 366 (D.Minn. Oct. 8, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 361

Document USA v. SEALED, 0:23-cr-00156, No. 361 (D.Minn. Oct. 4, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 351

Document USA v. SEALED, 0:23-cr-00156, No. 351 (D.Minn. Oct. 2, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 337

Document USA v. SEALED, 0:23-cr-00156, No. 337 (D.Minn. Sep. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 1392

Document USA v. Brown et al, 0:23-cr-00160, No. 1392 (D.Minn. Sep. 23, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 297

Document USA v. SEALED, 0:23-cr-00156, No. 297 (D.Minn. Aug. 29, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 298

Document USA v. SEALED, 0:23-cr-00156, No. 298 (D.Minn. Aug. 29, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 296

Document USA v. SEALED, 0:23-cr-00156, No. 296 (D.Minn. Aug. 28, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 290

Document USA v. SEALED, 0:23-cr-00156, No. 290 (D.Minn. Aug. 22, 2024)

cite Cite Document

No. 234

Document USA v. SEALED, 0:23-cr-00156, No. 234 (D.Minn. Jul. 12, 2024)

cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... >>