• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 9-23 of 245,563 results

MICHELLE ALONA JOHNSON v. LEE A JOHNSON

Docket 542022DR000380FDAXMX, Florida State, Putnam County, Seventh Circuit Court (May 2, 2022)
Washington Alicia R, presiding
Case TypeDomestic Relations/Family 16-E
TagsDomestic Relations / Family 16-E, Family, Family Law, Domestic Relations
Petitioner MICHELLE ALONA JOHNSON
Respondent LEE A JOHNSON
cite Cite Docket

USA v. Kaeding

Docket 0:21-cr-00169, Minnesota District Court (Aug. 4, 2021)
Judge Eric C. Tostrud, presiding, Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty
DivisionDMN
FlagsCLOSED, CONT-TRL
Defendant Harold Bennie Kaeding
Plaintiff USA

LEE MICHAEL JOHNSON (Misdemeanor 34-D)

Docket 422021MM004625MMAXXX, Florida State, Marion County, County Court (July 26, 2021)
Lori Cotton, Thomas Peter Thompson, presiding
Case TypeMisdemeanor 34-D
TagsMisdemeanor 34-D, Misdemeanor, Criminal
Defendant LEE MICHAEL JOHNSON
Also known as LEE M JOHNSON
Charging officer RICHARD DEMARCO
cite Cite Docket

LEE MICHAEL JOHNSON, JR (Misdemeanor 34-D)

Docket 242021MM000064MMAXMX, Florida State, Hamilton County, County Court (July 15, 2021)
Kenneth Norris Scaff, presiding
Case TypeMisdemeanor 34-D
TagsMisdemeanor 34-D, Misdemeanor, Criminal
Defendant LEE MICHAEL JOHNSON, JR
cite Cite Docket

Thomas Steinke, d/b/a Edison Signs vs Frank Roffers

Docket 27-CV-21-2749, Minnesota State, Hennepin County, District Court
Robiner Susan, presiding.
Case TypeContract
TagsContract, Civil
Plaintiff Edison Signs
Plaintiff Thomas Steinke
Defendant Frank Roffers
cite Cite Docket

USA v. Rahm et al

Docket 0:20-cr-00232, Minnesota District Court (Oct. 20, 2020)
Chief Judge John R. Tunheim, presiding, Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz
DivisionDMN
FlagsAPPEAL
DeadlineRelease of Transcript Restriction set for 3/26/2025.
DeadlineRelease of Transcript Restriction set for 3/28/2025.
Defendant Russell Jason Rahm
Defendant Terry Lynn Christensen
Defendant Jannice Kristina Laur
...
cite Cite Docket

LEE JOHNSON, JR (Misdemeanor 34-D)

Docket 242020MM000127MMAXMX, Florida State, Hamilton County, County Court (Oct. 12, 2020)
Kenneth Norris Scaff, presiding
Case TypeMisdemeanor 34-D
TagsMisdemeanor 34-D, Misdemeanor, Criminal
Defendant LEE JOHNSON, JR
cite Cite Docket
Analyze

Lee J Johnson et al v. Huntington Town of

Docket 701029/2020, New York State, Suffolk County, Supreme Court (Oct. 7, 2020)
Case TypeOther Real Property - SCAR
TagsOther, Real Property, SCAR, Tax
Plaintiff - Petitioner Lee J Johnson
Plaintiff - Petitioner Jasmin C Johnson
Defendant - Respondent Huntington Town of
cite Cite Docket

Waiver of right of respondent United - Main Document

Document Marlon Maurice Winborn, Petitioner v. United States, 24-6068, Waiver of right of respondent United, Main Document (U.S. Dec. 12, 2024)
The Government hereby waives its right to file a response to the petition in this case, unless requested to do so by the Court.
cite Cite Document

Petition for a writ of certiorari and - Proof of Service

Document Marlon Maurice Winborn, Petitioner v. United States, 24-6068, Petition for a writ of certiorari and, Proof of Service (U.S. Nov. 26, 2024)
I, Lee R. Johnson, do declare that on this date, November 26, 2024, as
required by Supreme Court Rule 29, I have served the enclosed MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI on each party to the above proceeding or that party’s counsel, and on every other person required to be served, by depositing an envelope containing the above documents in the United States mail properly addressed to each of them and with first-class postage prepaid.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
cite Cite Document

Petition for a writ of certiorari and - Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pau

Document Marlon Maurice Winborn, Petitioner v. United States, 24-6068, Petition for a writ of certiorari and, Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pau (U.S. Nov. 26, 2024)
requests leave to file the attached Petition for a Writ of Certiorari without prepayment of costs and to proceed in forma pauperis.
The Court has determined that the defendant in the above matter is financially unable to employ counsel and finds that it is in the interest of justice that counsel be assigned.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Lee Johnson, Attorney ID 189935, is appointed as counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A.
Attorney Lee Richard Johnson is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this appeal
Information regarding the CJA appointment and vouchering process in eVoucher will be emailed to counsel shortly.
cite Cite Document

Petition for a writ of certiorari and - Certificate of Word Count

Document Marlon Maurice Winborn, Petitioner v. United States, 24-6068, Petition for a writ of certiorari and, Certificate of Word Count (U.S. Nov. 26, 2024)
As required by Sup.
Ct. R. 33.1(h), I certify that the PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI in the above titled matter complies with the typeface requirements of Supreme Court Rule 33.1(b), being prepared in Century 13 point font for the text and 13 point font for footnotes, and this brief contains 2701 words, excluding the parts that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d) as needed.
cite Cite Document

Petition for a writ of certiorari and - Appendix

Document Marlon Maurice Winborn, Petitioner v. United States, 24-6068, Petition for a writ of certiorari and, Appendix (U.S. Nov. 26, 2024)
Analysis “We review the denial of a motion to suppress de novo but the underlying factual determinationsfor clear error, giving due weight to inferences drawn by law enforcementofficials.” United States v. Clutter, 674 F.3d 980, 982 (8th Cir. 2012).
Moreover, when one of the officers began to approach the red Saturn, Winborn suspiciously insisted, “ly]ou’ve got the wrong car.” While these facts separately could be consistent with innocent behavior, when taken together, they give rise to reasonable suspicion to justify the stop under the totality ofthe circumstances.” See United States v. Trogdon, 789 F.3d 907, 914 (8th Cir. 2015); Juvenile TK, 134 F.3d at 904 (“[I]n light of the totality of circumstances ..., in particular, the short distance between the location of the stop and the crime *The government argues Winborn’s Saturn further matched the third 911 caller’s description because it was missing its front license plate.
CASE0:22-cr-00319-PJS-JFD Doc. 89 Filed 05/15/23 Page 2 of 4 Winborn and Davis both contend that Judge Docherty erred in determining that Officers Sporny and Sanchez had a reasonable articulable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop of the red Saturn from which defendants and firearms were ultimately seized.
Officer Sporny's contemporaneous report weighs against reasonable suspicion becauseit indicates he stopped the red Saturn based on a hunch it might be involved in the shots fired.
We're here this morning for motions hearings in the case of United States vs. Marion Maurice Winborn and Marquis Deshon Davis, this Court's File Number 22~-CR-319.
cite Cite Document

Petition for a writ of certiorari and - Petition

Document Marlon Maurice Winborn, Petitioner v. United States, 24-6068, Petition for a writ of certiorari and, Petition (U.S. Nov. 26, 2024)
Mr. Winborn entered into a conditional plea agreement under which he plead guilty to one count of a superseding indictment that charged him with Felon in Possession of a Firearm but reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress.
This result marks a far departure from the fundamental Fourth Amendment jurisprudence that this Court established in a long line of decisions, including Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 27 (1968), United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-18 (1981), Florida v. J.L.
In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) this Court held that police officers could temporarily detain a suspect, provided they relied upon "specific, reasonable inferences," and not simply upon an "inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or 'hunch.''
Even with this specific report of illegal conduct, this Court stated that the circumstances before it presented a "close case" on whether the tip provided police with sufficient information to form a reasonable suspicion of the vehicle was involved in criminal activity.
Second, the caller reported seeing two people wearing masks "standing by" the red Saturn, which the Eighth Circuit ruled, supported an inference of "suspicious, perhaps criminal activity."
cite Cite Document

Lee Andrew Johnson v. The State of Texas

Docket 01-19-00806-CV, Texas State, 1st Court of Appeals (Oct. 18, 2019)
Case TypeContract
TagsContract, Civil
Appellant Lee Andrew Johnson
Appellee The State of Texas
cite Cite Docket
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... >>