• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 54-68 of 411 results

No. 126 Order

Document Noco Company v. Shenzhen Valuelink E-Commerce Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-00049, No. 126 (N.D.Ohio Jul. 22, 2021)
Nonetheless, the Shenzhen Defendants maintain that NOCO cannot rely on Rule 4(k)(2) because “[NOCO] did not assert Rule 4(k)(2) as a basis for jurisdiction in the Complaint, nor does the Complaint contain any allegations regarding ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 42 Joint Motion for extension of Case Deadlines filed by Plaintiff Noco Company

Document Noco Company v. Aukey Technology Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-02322, No. 42 (N.D.Ohio Dec. 6, 2022)
P. 6(b)(1)(A), Plaintiff The NOCO Company (“NOCO”) and Defendants Aukey Technology Co., Ltd., (“Aukey”), Shenzhenshi Jiangyun Shangmaoyouxiangongsi (“HuiMing”), and Wodeshijikeji Shenzhen Youxiangongsi (“WorldUS”) (collectively, the “Parties”) jointly request that this Court issue an order modifying the deadlines it initially set forth in its December 9, 2021 Case Management Conference Order (ECF # 33).
The Parties are in the process of exchanging search terms to aid in the retrieval and production of requested documents and Electronically Stored Information.
work diligently to obtain information responsive to the subpoena, which NOCO considers highly relevant and crucial to NOCO’s claims in this case.
As the Parties noted to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker during the September 7, 2022, mediation session, thorough discovery is essential to substantive settlement discussions.
Accordingly, the Parties submit that good cause exists to justify the requested extension and urge the Court to issue an order resetting the case deadlines as set forth above.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 156

Document Noco Company v. Shenzhen Valuelink E-Commerce Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-00049, No. 156 (N.D.Ohio Aug. 11, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 23

Document Noco Company v. Aukey Technology Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-02322, No. 23 (N.D.Ohio Jun. 23, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 48

Document Noco Company v. Aukey Technology Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-02322, No. 48 (N.D.Ohio Aug. 7, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 120

Document Noco Company v. Shenzhen Valuelink E-Commerce Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-00049, No. 120 (N.D.Ohio Jun. 11, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 117

Document Noco Company v. Shenzhen Valuelink E-Commerce Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-00049, No. 117 (N.D.Ohio Apr. 27, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 152

Document Noco Company v. Shenzhen Valuelink E-Commerce Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-00049, No. 152 (N.D.Ohio Apr. 24, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 38

Document Noco Company v. Aukey Technology Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-02322, No. 38 (N.D.Ohio Aug. 10, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 112

Document Noco Company v. Shenzhen Valuelink E-Commerce Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-00049, No. 112 (N.D.Ohio Feb. 12, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 111

Document Noco Company v. Shenzhen Valuelink E-Commerce Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-00049, No. 111 (N.D.Ohio Feb. 2, 2021)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 44

Document Noco Company v. Aukey Technology Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-02322, No. 44 (N.D.Ohio Mar. 15, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 148

Document Noco Company v. Shenzhen Valuelink E-Commerce Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-00049, No. 148 (N.D.Ohio Feb. 6, 2023)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 140

Document Noco Company v. Shenzhen Valuelink E-Commerce Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-00049, No. 140 (N.D.Ohio May. 31, 2022)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 9

Document Noco Company v. Aukey Technology Co., Ltd., et al., 1:20-cv-02322, No. 9 (N.D.Ohio Dec. 8, 2020)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>