• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 84-98 of 547 results

No. 78 Amicus Brief as of right or by consent of the parties filed by Gautam Hans for Amici Curiae ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 78 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
None of the relevant cases (Tornillo, PG&E, and Hurley) reference such a factor.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 011012025869 Amicus Brief as of right or by consent of the parties filed by Gautam Hans for Amici Curiae ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 011012025869 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
None of the relevant cases (Tornillo, PG&E, and Hurley) reference such a factor.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 011012025815 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Patrick J. Carome for Internet Association [21-12355] (ECF: ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 011012025815 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
USCA11 Case: 21-12355 Date Filed: 11/15/2021 Page: 1 of 1  ÿ  ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ   ÿÿ ÿ   !"#$ÿ&'ÿ&($'ÿÿ)* (+()*"ÿ(!ÿ*!ÿ*))"*,ÿ-.$ÿ/"ÿ) )" ,#ÿ*0-("0ÿ"('" ÿÿ'"ÿ/* ÿ1ÿ'($ÿ+. ÿ ÿ1 ÿ'"ÿ)* (+.,* ÿ) +""0(!2 ). $.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 67 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Gautam Hans for Amici Curiae First Amendment Law Professors ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 67 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
Appearance of Counsel Form Attorneys who wishto participate in an appeal must be properly admitted either to the bar of this court or for the particular proceeding pursuant fo 11th Cir. R. 46-1, et seq.
Court of Appeals No. Attorney General, State of Florida, etal.
First Amendment Law Professors | ' | | | 9 “ In this court these parties are: LI appellant(s) O petitioner(s) CJ intervenor(s) C1 appellee(s) [1 respondent(s) The following related or similar cases are pending on the docket ofthis court: ; amicus curiae Checkhere if you are lead counsel.
mena67, g hereby certify that I am an active memberin goodstanding ofthe state bar or the bar ofthe highest court ofthe state Cfincluding the District of Columbia) named below,and that my license to practice law in the namedstateis not currently lapsed for any reason,including but not limited to retirement, placement in inactive status, failure to pay bar membership ees or failure to complete continuing education requirements.
I understand that I am required to notify the clerk of this c¢ourt within 14 days ofany changesin the status ofmy state bar memberships.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 69 Amicus Brief as of right or by consent of the parties filed by Jacob Sommer for Chamber of ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 69 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
None has a parent corporation ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 011012025914 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jeffrey P. Doss for Amicus Curiae Christopher Cox [21-12355] ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 011012025914 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
USCA11 Case: 21-12355 Date Filed: 11/15/2021 Page: 1 of 1
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 011012025398 The amicus brief filed by Attorney Jacob A. Sommer for Amici Curiae Chamber of Progress, Connected ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 011012025398 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
November 15, 2021 For rules and forms visit www.ca11.uscourts.gov David J. Smith Clerk of Court
Appeal Number: 21-12355-GG Case Style: Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al District Court Docket No: 4:21-cv-00220-RH-MAF We have received from you for filing in this appeal the following: Amicus brief.
Unless an attorney is appearing on behalf of the United States, a federal public defender, appointed by a federal court under the Criminal Justice Act, or otherwise appointed by this Court.
11th Cir. R. 46-1 requires admission to the Eleventh Circuit bar as a condition to practice before the court.
In the alternative, an attorney who does not reside in the circuit may be eligible to apply to appear pro hac vice in a particular proceeding.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 65 Amicus Brief as of right or by consent of the parties filed by Cato Institute

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 65 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
If an editor chooses to host a wide range of voices and viewpoints, that editor does not forfeit the right to nonetheless exclude certain speech as off-limits, nor to prioritize some messages over others.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 011012025872 Amicus Brief as of right or by consent of the parties filed by Allonn E. Levy for IP Justice

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 011012025872 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
None of the counsel for the parties in this litigation has authored this brief, in whole or in part.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 011012025917 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jonathan R. Little for Amicus Curiae Christopher Cox [21-12355] ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 011012025917 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
USCA11 Case: 21-12355 Date Filed: 11/15/2021 Page: 1 of 1
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 80 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jackson R. Sharman III for Amicus Curiae Christopher Cox ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 80 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
USCA11 Case: 21-12355 Document: 80 Date Filed: 11/15/2021 Page: 1 of 1
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 011012025863 Amicus Brief as of right or by consent of the parties filed by Patrick J. Carome for Internet ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 011012025863 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
... case on appeal other than those listed in the appellants’, appellees’, and other amici’s certificates. /s/ Patrick J. Carome PATRICK J. CAROME Amicus further states, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29, 1 that none ...
... any attempt to moderate has the potential to be deemed “inconsistent.” So rather than encouraging varied approaches to content moderation, S.B. 7072 would effectively mandate a uniform approach to content moderation: none.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 011012025932 Amicus Brief as of right or by consent of the parties filed by Catherine R. Gellis for Floor64, ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 011012025932 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
But none of these platforms could exist to support the Copia Institute's expressive business were it not for the First Amendment and Section 230 enabling them to provide these services.
Yet the Florida legislature has provided none; it has simply decided that sites meeting these terms are too wealthy or too popular for their constitutional or statutory rights to remain protected, without articulating any sort of state interest, ...
Even if it were practical for 25 None of this was an idle concern, given that Stratton Oakmont itself was a case where a state court, interpreting state law, had created an enormous risk of platform liability based solely on local law.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 75 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Ari Holtzblatt for Internet Association [21-12355] (ECF: ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 75 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
USCA11 Case: 21-12355 Document: 75 Date Filed: 11/15/2021 Page: 1 of 1  ÿ  ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ   ÿÿ ÿ   !"#$ÿ&'ÿ&($'ÿÿ)* (+()*"ÿ(!ÿ*!ÿ*))"*,ÿ-.$ÿ/"ÿ) )" ,#ÿ*0-("0ÿ"('" ÿÿ'"ÿ/* ÿ1ÿ'($ÿ+. ÿ ÿ1 ÿ'"ÿ)* (+.,* ÿ) +""0(!2 ). $.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 83 Amicus Brief as of right or by consent of the parties filed by Jackson R. Sharman III for Amicus ...

Document Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al, 21-12355, No. 83 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2021)
Lastly, it will describe the applicability of the Supremacy Clause to this case, without which not only Florida but every state so inclined would be free to engage in “every pretence, under which ingenuity could, by its miserable subterfuges, escape from the controlling power of the constitution.” 3 JOSEPH STORY, COMMENTARIES ON THE CONSTITUTION § 1839 (3d ed. 1858).
Section 230 is premised on the fact that it would be unreasonable for the law to require websites to continuously monitor the vast amount of textual, graphic, audio, and video content posted to their sites around the clock, every day, let alone USCA11 Case: 21-12355 Document: 83 Date Filed: 11/15/2021 Page: 26 of 43
6 The Act’s definition of “social media platform” does provide admirable clarity in one instance: it expressly excludes platforms “operated by a company that owns and operates a theme park or entertainment complex.” Id. USCA11 Case: 21-12355 Document: 83 Date Filed: 11/15/2021 Page: 30 of 43
Many of these, although no one would consider them to be “social media” platforms, are at risk of being swept into the Act’s bespoke definition of “social media.” The sheer breadth of the Act’s coverage makes its multiple mandates USCA11 Case: 21-12355 Document: 83 Date Filed: 11/15/2021 Page: 33 of 43
First, and most fundamentally, it is because the essential purpose of Section 230 is to establish a uniform federal policy, applicable across the Internet, that avoids results such as the New York state court decision that exposed websites to liability for content moderation.
cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... >>