Search court records - party Kenton Knickmeyer, page 3

No. 116 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber:as to Michael Coscia Government's response ...

Document USA v. Coscia, 1:14-cr-00551, No. 116 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 25, 2016)

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1 Eastern Division

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, February 25, 2016: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber:as to Michael Coscia Government's response to defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal and for a new trial to be filed by 3/18/2016.

It was generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and criminal dockets of this District.

If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Cite Document

Analyze

No. 103 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber:Government's Unopposed Motion for extension ...

Document USA v. Coscia, 1:14-cr-00551, No. 103 (N.D.Ill. Jan. 19, 2016)

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1 Eastern Division

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, January 7, 2016: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber:Government's Unopposed Motion for extension of time to 1/29/2016 in which to file response memorandum to post−conviction motions [101] is granted as to Michael Coscia (1).

It was generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and criminal dockets of this District.

If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Cite Document

Analyze

No. 67 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to Michael Coscia: The Governments Motions in Limine [ECF ...

Document USA v. Coscia, 1:14-cr-00551, No. 67 (N.D.Ill. Oct. 19, 2015)

Motion in LiminePartial

However, Coscia does intend to offer evidence relating to certain rules and regulations to show that he did not act with the requisite intent to defraud or cancel orders before execution.

Certain rules and regulations may be relevant to show that Coscia’s conduct was consistent with permitted market behavior, and thus did not reflect intent to defraud or cancel orders prior to execution.

In addition, because the Government has not shown how the complaints and follow-up investigations are relevant to Coscia’s intent to defraud others or cancel orders before execution, the Court finds that they too should be excluded.

Coscia urges the Court to “require the Government to offer proof of a direct causal connection to the trading activity ... that is charged in the Indictment” before admitting any evidence of market harm or disruption that other traders observed.

The Court reserves ruling on the admissibility of such evidence until trial, when the Government will have the opportunity to show a direct connection to Coscia and the trading activity charged in the indictment.

Cite Document

Analyze

No. 60 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF I. STEPHEN RABIN'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT ...

Document RABIN v. JOHN DOE MARKET MAKERS et al, 2:15-cv-00551, No. 60 (E.D.Pa. Jun. 16, 2015)

This Court, having considered the motion of plaintiff I. Stephen Rabin ("Movant") for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and for Approval of Movant's Selection of Lead Counsel, the memorandum of law submitted in support thereof, and the Declaration of Lawrence Deutsch submitted in support thereof, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

Lead Plaintiff has selected and retained Lawrence Deutsch and Robin Switzenbaum of Berger & Montague, P.C. and Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. to serve as Lead Counsel in this class action.

The Court approves the selection of Lawrence Deutsch and Robin Switzenbaum of Berger & Montague, P.C. and Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. to serve as Plaintiffs Lead Counsel.

Lead Counsel shall have the responsibility of receiving and disseminating Court orders and notices.

During the pendency of this litigation, or until further order of this Court, the parties shall preserve all documents within their possession, custody, or control which is relevant to the subject matter of the pending litigation, including computer-generated and stored information, computerized data, and electronic mail.

Cite Document

Analyze

No. 59 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION

Document RABIN v. JOHN DOE MARKET MAKERS et al, 2:15-cv-00551, No. 59 (E.D.Pa. Jun. 16, 2015)

Certain market makers, the Complaint alleges, have used privileges provided by their status, such as the ability to simultaneously buy and sell the same numbers of options, to unfairly win a large share of the open interest.

Rabin argues that the market makers have violated federal securities laws and that the retail investors injured by the trades are a class entitled to relief.

Freshwater contends Rabin’s calculations “are unreliable and flawed since they rely on a variable that, at this point in the litigation and without the benefit of discovery, cannot be determined: the number of options traded by the defendants on the day before the ex-dividend date.” Freshwater’s Reply in Further Support of its Motion at 1.

There is certainly persuasive evidence that “[t]he drafters of the PSLRA sought to reduce the influence of lawyers on class action securities by weighting the determination of large institutional investors.” City of Monroe Employees Retirement Sys.

The mechanism discussed is codified at 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(iii)(I)(bb), and it explicitly directs courts to choose lead plaintiffs with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class.

Cite Document

Analyze

No. 194 MOTION by USA to supplement as to Michael Coscia GOVERNMENTS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD ...

Document USA v. Coscia, 1:14-cr-00551, No. 194 (N.D.Ill. Oct. 6, 2016)

Under Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, “[t]he original papers and exhibits filed in the district court; ... the transcript of proceedings, if any; and ... a certified copy of the docket entries prepared by the district clerk” constitute the record on appeal.

A copy of the government’s proposed cover sheet to accompany the exhibit when submitted to the Clerk’s Office is attached to this motion.

WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests that the court issue an order directing the clerk to supplement the record on appeal with Government Exhibit ICE Summary Chart 6.

The United States of America, by ZACHARY T. FARDON, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, hereby furnishes the District Court Clerk with the following exhibit to be included in the record on appeal: Government Exhibit ICE Summary Chart 6.

Assistant United States Attorney 219 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 _ L4:LL;LLELEwHmiL;L:LL;44Vm4\mo ;L;;LL;:L«LwwseL

Cite Document

Analyze