• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Active Filters1
Displaying 24-38 of 472 results

No. 74 MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Attorney David Brown for Appellee Anna Lange

Document Anna Lange v. Houston County, Georgia, et al, 22-13626, No. 74 (11th Cir. Mar. 7, 2024)
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
NOW COMES the undersigned, David Brown, who files this Motion for Leave to Withdraw as counsel of record for Sgt.
Anna Lange.
As grounds for said Motion, the undersigned states that his last day at the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund (“TLDEF”) is March 8th, 2024.
Plaintiff-Appellee will continue to be represented by Gabriel Arkles from TLDEF, as well as all counsel who have entered a notice of appearance on behalf of Plaintiff-Appellee, and no party will be prejudiced by this withdrawal.
USCA11 Case: 22-13626 Document: 74 Date Filed: 03/07/2024 Page: 2 of 2 Dated: March 7, 2024 Respectfully submitted, David Brown
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 124 Amicus Brief filed by Amicus Curiae American Civil Rights Project

Document Anna Lange v. Houston County, Georgia, et al, 22-13626, No. 124 (11th Cir. Oct. 23, 2024)
Neither Title VII nor Bostock says anything about whether an em- ployer must ensure coverage of any of these treatments, or whether an employer like the Defendants, whose policies cover none of these treat- ments, has done anything ...
... Case: 22-13626 Document: 124 Date Filed: 10/23/2024 Page: 17 of 20 In Adams, the en banc Court faced and rejected the argument that “Bostock equated ‘sex’ to ‘transgender status[.]”18 Yet, here, the panel- majority nonetheless ...
... (recognizing same circuit split and concluding that 11th Circuit’s Adams decision “is closer to the mark in concluding “sex” in Title IX has a genetic sense, given that word’s normal usage when the statute was enacted[,]” but nonetheless ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 125 Amicus Brief filed by Amicus Curiae Christian Employers Alliance

Document Anna Lange v. Houston County, Georgia, et al, 22-13626, No. 125 (11th Cir. Oct. 23, 2024)
If Lange were nonetheless correct that the exclusion constitutes facial discrim- ination under Title VII, the consequences would be far-reaching and, in cases like this involving gender dysphoria, self-defeating.
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 118 Appellant's brief filed by Houston County, Georgia and Sheriff, Houston County

Document Anna Lange v. Houston County, Georgia, et al, 22-13626, No. 118 (11th Cir. Sep. 30, 2024)
Whiteside v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 798 F. Supp. 1380, 1390 (D. Minn. 1992) (“Any time that the coverage of an employee benefit plan is not universal, line-drawing becomes a necessary evil.”) But none of the Bostock cases dealt with ...
79-1 at 18 (vacated).] All exclusions apply to all plan participants–Lange is subject to the exclusions for sexual dysfunction drugs, bariatric surgery, and hearing aids, none of which she is known to need or desire; and cisgender ...
cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 100

Document Texas Bankers v. Board of Governors, 24-10367, No. 100 (5th Cir. Sep. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 101

Document Texas Bankers v. Board of Governors, 24-10367, No. 101 (5th Cir. Sep. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 98

Document Texas Bankers v. Board of Governors, 24-10367, No. 98 (5th Cir. Sep. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 96

Document Texas Bankers v. Board of Governors, 24-10367, No. 96 (5th Cir. Sep. 18, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 59

Document Texas Bankers v. Board of Governors, 24-10367, No. 59 (5th Cir. Jul. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 60

Document Texas Bankers v. Board of Governors, 24-10367, No. 60 (5th Cir. Jul. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 54

Document Texas Bankers v. Board of Governors, 24-10367, No. 54 (5th Cir. Jul. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 56

Document Texas Bankers v. Board of Governors, 24-10367, No. 56 (5th Cir. Jul. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 79

Document Texas Bankers v. Board of Governors, 24-10367, No. 79 (5th Cir. Jul. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 58

Document Texas Bankers v. Board of Governors, 24-10367, No. 58 (5th Cir. Jul. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze

No. 52

Document Texas Bankers v. Board of Governors, 24-10367, No. 52 (5th Cir. Jul. 25, 2024)

cite Cite Document
Analyze
<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... >>