Search court records - party Judith Best, page 6

Granting Qualcomm's and Apple's Joint, Unopposed Motion to Forgo Mediation [Docket No. 1093-022] No. 650800

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 650800-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Jul. 20, 2018)

_ (July 20, 2018) Qualcomm’s and Apple’s joint, unopposed motion (“Motion”), ﬁled on July 19, 2018, to forgo the mediation and mediation report contained in the Procedural Schedule, Motion Docket No. 1093-O22,is hereby granted.

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Find cases with Judge
- MaryJoan McNamara
Find cases with Party
- Adobe Systems
- Apple
Find cases with Firm

Granting Qualcomm's and Apple's Joint, Unopposed Motion to Take Certain Discovery after Original Deadlines and to Amend the Procedural Schedule [Motion Docket No. 1093-021] No. 650682

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 650682-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Jul. 19, 2018)

_(July 19, 2018) For good cause shown, Complainant Qualcomm, Incorporated’s (“Qualcomm”) and Respondent Apple, Inc.’s (“Apple”) joint, unopposed motion (“Joint Motion”) to take certain depositions after the original Procedural Schedule deadlines, and to amend the Procedural Schedule in this Investigation consistent with the revised schedule contained in the Joint Motion, Motion Docket No. 1093-021, is hereby granted in its entirely.

Cite Document

Analyze

Search within this case
Find cases with Judge
- MaryJoan McNamara
Find cases with Party
- Adobe Systems
- Apple
Find cases with Firm

Denying Apple's Motion to Compel Qualcomm to Produce Clawed Back Documents Relating to U.S. Patent No. 9,154,356 [Motion Docket No. 1093-012] No. 650478

Document Certain Mobile Electronic Devices and Radio Frequency and Processing Components Thereof, 337-1093, No. 650478-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Jul. 17, 2018)

On May 29, 2018, Respondent Apple Inc. (“Apple”) ﬁled a motion to compel (“Motion”) Complainant Qualcomm, Inc. (“Qualcomm”) to provide some 16 documents called “inventor disclosure forms” (“IDFs”) related to the conception U.S. Patent No. 9,154,356 (“’356 patent”) that Qualcomrn had “clawed back” as attorney-client privileged documents.

On June 8, 2018, Staff ﬁled its response (“Staff Response”) in which it supported Apple’s Motion and agreed with Apple that too much time had elapsed between Qualcomm’s disclosure of the documents and its claw back.

During the July 12, 2018 Telephone Conference, Apple suggested that the clawed-back documents might contain “inventorship” related information.

On July 16, 2018, Qualcomm provided by courier two (2) sets of the clawed back, IDF documents to Chambers for my review.

\" Mg MaryJoag/l6IcNafnara Administrative Law Judge 2The package of Qualco1nm’s clawed-back, 16 IDF documents identiﬁed in fn.l, inﬁa, is dated July 13, 2018, and notes it was delivered “By Courier.” The package was delivered to Chambers on July 16, 2018.

Cite Document

Analyze